Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santana,Ana Lúcia Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Teixeira,Alexandre de Oliveira, Lopes,Darci Clementino, Santana,Rodrigo Almeida, Rocha Junior,Carlos Magno, Moreira,Leonardo Marmo, Hannas,Melissa Izabel, Corassa,Anderson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402018000100093
Resumo: SUMMARY The objective of the study was to determine the digestible calcium from different sources by direct and indirect methods. Thirty castrated male pigs were used, distributed in randomized blocks, in six treatments: 1- Calcitic limestone; 2-Dicalcium phosphate powder 18%; 3- Dicalcium phosphate powder 20%; 4- Dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%; 5- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%; 6- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%, with six replicates and one animal per experimental unit. A basal diet was formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of the animals, except for calcium (0.06%) and the evaluated sources replaced the basal diet in order to provide 0.45% of total Ca. At the same time, two stool collection methods were evaluated: total collection and fecal indicator. The animals were housed in metabolism cages for 12 days to collect feces and urine to determine the calcium values used to estimate digestibility coefficients and digestible calcium. The total collection method and the faecal indicator method did not affect the true digestibility coefficient of calcium. The calcium digestibility of the microgranulated dicalcium phosphate 21% (MM21) was superior in comparison with the other calcium sources evaluated by the indirect method in the present study. The average values of true digestibility of the calcium sources, in percentage, were: calcitic limestone: 82.47; dicalcium phosphate powder 18%: 80.87; dicalcium phosphate powder 20%: 85.65; dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%: 81.65; monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%: 84.15; and monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%: 88.35. The two methodologies can be used to determine the digestibility of calcium.
id UFBA-3_9208fe8a785e828ad4540059d86e3b43
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-99402018000100093
network_acronym_str UFBA-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
repository_id_str
spelling Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methodsabsorptionmineralsolubilitySUMMARY The objective of the study was to determine the digestible calcium from different sources by direct and indirect methods. Thirty castrated male pigs were used, distributed in randomized blocks, in six treatments: 1- Calcitic limestone; 2-Dicalcium phosphate powder 18%; 3- Dicalcium phosphate powder 20%; 4- Dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%; 5- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%; 6- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%, with six replicates and one animal per experimental unit. A basal diet was formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of the animals, except for calcium (0.06%) and the evaluated sources replaced the basal diet in order to provide 0.45% of total Ca. At the same time, two stool collection methods were evaluated: total collection and fecal indicator. The animals were housed in metabolism cages for 12 days to collect feces and urine to determine the calcium values used to estimate digestibility coefficients and digestible calcium. The total collection method and the faecal indicator method did not affect the true digestibility coefficient of calcium. The calcium digestibility of the microgranulated dicalcium phosphate 21% (MM21) was superior in comparison with the other calcium sources evaluated by the indirect method in the present study. The average values of true digestibility of the calcium sources, in percentage, were: calcitic limestone: 82.47; dicalcium phosphate powder 18%: 80.87; dicalcium phosphate powder 20%: 85.65; dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%: 81.65; monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%: 84.15; and monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%: 88.35. The two methodologies can be used to determine the digestibility of calcium.UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402018000100093Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.19 n.1 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animalinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBA10.1590/s1519-99402018000100009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantana,Ana Lúcia AlmeidaTeixeira,Alexandre de OliveiraLopes,Darci ClementinoSantana,Rodrigo AlmeidaRocha Junior,Carlos MagnoMoreira,Leonardo MarmoHannas,Melissa IzabelCorassa,Andersoneng2018-04-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-99402018000100093Revistahttp://www.rbspa.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbspa@ufba.br1519-99401519-9940opendoar:2018-04-26T00:00Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods
title Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods
spellingShingle Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods
Santana,Ana Lúcia Almeida
absorption
mineral
solubility
title_short Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods
title_full Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods
title_fullStr Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods
title_full_unstemmed Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods
title_sort Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods
author Santana,Ana Lúcia Almeida
author_facet Santana,Ana Lúcia Almeida
Teixeira,Alexandre de Oliveira
Lopes,Darci Clementino
Santana,Rodrigo Almeida
Rocha Junior,Carlos Magno
Moreira,Leonardo Marmo
Hannas,Melissa Izabel
Corassa,Anderson
author_role author
author2 Teixeira,Alexandre de Oliveira
Lopes,Darci Clementino
Santana,Rodrigo Almeida
Rocha Junior,Carlos Magno
Moreira,Leonardo Marmo
Hannas,Melissa Izabel
Corassa,Anderson
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santana,Ana Lúcia Almeida
Teixeira,Alexandre de Oliveira
Lopes,Darci Clementino
Santana,Rodrigo Almeida
Rocha Junior,Carlos Magno
Moreira,Leonardo Marmo
Hannas,Melissa Izabel
Corassa,Anderson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv absorption
mineral
solubility
topic absorption
mineral
solubility
description SUMMARY The objective of the study was to determine the digestible calcium from different sources by direct and indirect methods. Thirty castrated male pigs were used, distributed in randomized blocks, in six treatments: 1- Calcitic limestone; 2-Dicalcium phosphate powder 18%; 3- Dicalcium phosphate powder 20%; 4- Dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%; 5- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%; 6- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%, with six replicates and one animal per experimental unit. A basal diet was formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of the animals, except for calcium (0.06%) and the evaluated sources replaced the basal diet in order to provide 0.45% of total Ca. At the same time, two stool collection methods were evaluated: total collection and fecal indicator. The animals were housed in metabolism cages for 12 days to collect feces and urine to determine the calcium values used to estimate digestibility coefficients and digestible calcium. The total collection method and the faecal indicator method did not affect the true digestibility coefficient of calcium. The calcium digestibility of the microgranulated dicalcium phosphate 21% (MM21) was superior in comparison with the other calcium sources evaluated by the indirect method in the present study. The average values of true digestibility of the calcium sources, in percentage, were: calcitic limestone: 82.47; dicalcium phosphate powder 18%: 80.87; dicalcium phosphate powder 20%: 85.65; dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%: 81.65; monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%: 84.15; and monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%: 88.35. The two methodologies can be used to determine the digestibility of calcium.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402018000100093
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402018000100093
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1519-99402018000100009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.19 n.1 2018
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
collection Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbspa@ufba.br
_version_ 1750297508271095808