Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402018000100093 |
Resumo: | SUMMARY The objective of the study was to determine the digestible calcium from different sources by direct and indirect methods. Thirty castrated male pigs were used, distributed in randomized blocks, in six treatments: 1- Calcitic limestone; 2-Dicalcium phosphate powder 18%; 3- Dicalcium phosphate powder 20%; 4- Dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%; 5- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%; 6- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%, with six replicates and one animal per experimental unit. A basal diet was formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of the animals, except for calcium (0.06%) and the evaluated sources replaced the basal diet in order to provide 0.45% of total Ca. At the same time, two stool collection methods were evaluated: total collection and fecal indicator. The animals were housed in metabolism cages for 12 days to collect feces and urine to determine the calcium values used to estimate digestibility coefficients and digestible calcium. The total collection method and the faecal indicator method did not affect the true digestibility coefficient of calcium. The calcium digestibility of the microgranulated dicalcium phosphate 21% (MM21) was superior in comparison with the other calcium sources evaluated by the indirect method in the present study. The average values of true digestibility of the calcium sources, in percentage, were: calcitic limestone: 82.47; dicalcium phosphate powder 18%: 80.87; dicalcium phosphate powder 20%: 85.65; dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%: 81.65; monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%: 84.15; and monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%: 88.35. The two methodologies can be used to determine the digestibility of calcium. |
id |
UFBA-3_9208fe8a785e828ad4540059d86e3b43 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1519-99402018000100093 |
network_acronym_str |
UFBA-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methodsabsorptionmineralsolubilitySUMMARY The objective of the study was to determine the digestible calcium from different sources by direct and indirect methods. Thirty castrated male pigs were used, distributed in randomized blocks, in six treatments: 1- Calcitic limestone; 2-Dicalcium phosphate powder 18%; 3- Dicalcium phosphate powder 20%; 4- Dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%; 5- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%; 6- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%, with six replicates and one animal per experimental unit. A basal diet was formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of the animals, except for calcium (0.06%) and the evaluated sources replaced the basal diet in order to provide 0.45% of total Ca. At the same time, two stool collection methods were evaluated: total collection and fecal indicator. The animals were housed in metabolism cages for 12 days to collect feces and urine to determine the calcium values used to estimate digestibility coefficients and digestible calcium. The total collection method and the faecal indicator method did not affect the true digestibility coefficient of calcium. The calcium digestibility of the microgranulated dicalcium phosphate 21% (MM21) was superior in comparison with the other calcium sources evaluated by the indirect method in the present study. The average values of true digestibility of the calcium sources, in percentage, were: calcitic limestone: 82.47; dicalcium phosphate powder 18%: 80.87; dicalcium phosphate powder 20%: 85.65; dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%: 81.65; monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%: 84.15; and monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%: 88.35. The two methodologies can be used to determine the digestibility of calcium.UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402018000100093Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.19 n.1 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animalinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBA10.1590/s1519-99402018000100009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantana,Ana Lúcia AlmeidaTeixeira,Alexandre de OliveiraLopes,Darci ClementinoSantana,Rodrigo AlmeidaRocha Junior,Carlos MagnoMoreira,Leonardo MarmoHannas,Melissa IzabelCorassa,Andersoneng2018-04-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-99402018000100093Revistahttp://www.rbspa.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbspa@ufba.br1519-99401519-9940opendoar:2018-04-26T00:00Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods |
title |
Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods |
spellingShingle |
Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods Santana,Ana Lúcia Almeida absorption mineral solubility |
title_short |
Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods |
title_full |
Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods |
title_fullStr |
Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods |
title_sort |
Digestibility of calcium and digestible calcium from inorganic sources evaluated in swine by two methods |
author |
Santana,Ana Lúcia Almeida |
author_facet |
Santana,Ana Lúcia Almeida Teixeira,Alexandre de Oliveira Lopes,Darci Clementino Santana,Rodrigo Almeida Rocha Junior,Carlos Magno Moreira,Leonardo Marmo Hannas,Melissa Izabel Corassa,Anderson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Teixeira,Alexandre de Oliveira Lopes,Darci Clementino Santana,Rodrigo Almeida Rocha Junior,Carlos Magno Moreira,Leonardo Marmo Hannas,Melissa Izabel Corassa,Anderson |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santana,Ana Lúcia Almeida Teixeira,Alexandre de Oliveira Lopes,Darci Clementino Santana,Rodrigo Almeida Rocha Junior,Carlos Magno Moreira,Leonardo Marmo Hannas,Melissa Izabel Corassa,Anderson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
absorption mineral solubility |
topic |
absorption mineral solubility |
description |
SUMMARY The objective of the study was to determine the digestible calcium from different sources by direct and indirect methods. Thirty castrated male pigs were used, distributed in randomized blocks, in six treatments: 1- Calcitic limestone; 2-Dicalcium phosphate powder 18%; 3- Dicalcium phosphate powder 20%; 4- Dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%; 5- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%; 6- Monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%, with six replicates and one animal per experimental unit. A basal diet was formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of the animals, except for calcium (0.06%) and the evaluated sources replaced the basal diet in order to provide 0.45% of total Ca. At the same time, two stool collection methods were evaluated: total collection and fecal indicator. The animals were housed in metabolism cages for 12 days to collect feces and urine to determine the calcium values used to estimate digestibility coefficients and digestible calcium. The total collection method and the faecal indicator method did not affect the true digestibility coefficient of calcium. The calcium digestibility of the microgranulated dicalcium phosphate 21% (MM21) was superior in comparison with the other calcium sources evaluated by the indirect method in the present study. The average values of true digestibility of the calcium sources, in percentage, were: calcitic limestone: 82.47; dicalcium phosphate powder 18%: 80.87; dicalcium phosphate powder 20%: 85.65; dicalcium microgranulated phosphate 18%: 81.65; monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 20%: 84.15; and monodicalcium microgranulated phosphate 21%: 88.35. The two methodologies can be used to determine the digestibility of calcium. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402018000100093 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402018000100093 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1519-99402018000100009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.19 n.1 2018 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) instacron:UFBA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
instacron_str |
UFBA |
institution |
UFBA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbspa@ufba.br |
_version_ |
1750297508271095808 |