The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of Wittgenstein

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Batista
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19017
Resumo: In the book On Certainty, Wittgenstein discusses central epistemological questions, such as the nature and the scope of knowledge, the distinction between knowledge and certainty, the problem of skepticism, and the dynamic of proposition formation. The author distinguishes between propositions that either count as a rule or as empirical. It is suggested that knowledge is different from certainty; the latter serve as ground for knowledge and certainties are expressed by means of hinge propositions. This type of proposition works as foundation for the formulation of empirical propositions. Hinge propositions are exempt from doubt since they are supposed to be assented on certainties. In order to doubt on such propositions, one needs to indicate in what conditions and contexts a doubt can be raised, otherwise the doubt is not allowed. However, hinge propositions are not absolutely doubtless because they can turn into empirical and accordingly, undergo new questionings. This paper aims to understand the formation and the distinction between empirical and hinge propositions and how they become accepted by the linguistic community.
id UFC-17_67b4c143b5ce24f6dd36ed1df5e69083
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/19017
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of WittgensteinO processo de formação de proposições e a possibilidade da dúvida no Sobre a Certeza de WittgensteinFoundationalism. Doubt. Knowledge. Certainty.Fundacionalismo. Dúvida. Conhecimento. Certeza.In the book On Certainty, Wittgenstein discusses central epistemological questions, such as the nature and the scope of knowledge, the distinction between knowledge and certainty, the problem of skepticism, and the dynamic of proposition formation. The author distinguishes between propositions that either count as a rule or as empirical. It is suggested that knowledge is different from certainty; the latter serve as ground for knowledge and certainties are expressed by means of hinge propositions. This type of proposition works as foundation for the formulation of empirical propositions. Hinge propositions are exempt from doubt since they are supposed to be assented on certainties. In order to doubt on such propositions, one needs to indicate in what conditions and contexts a doubt can be raised, otherwise the doubt is not allowed. However, hinge propositions are not absolutely doubtless because they can turn into empirical and accordingly, undergo new questionings. This paper aims to understand the formation and the distinction between empirical and hinge propositions and how they become accepted by the linguistic community.No Sobre a Certeza, Wittgenstein discute questões epistemológicas centrais, como a natureza do conhecimento, o ceticismo e a dinâmica da formação de proposições que podem valer ora como regra e ora como empírica. O autor sugere que o conhecimento difere da certeza; esta última serve de base para o conhecimento e, certezas são expressas na forma de proposições fulcrais, i.e., proposições que servem de fundamento para a formulação de proposições empíricas. Proposições fulcrais estão isentas da dúvida porque já foram validadas. Para que seja possível duvidar destas proposições, é necessário a existência de um contexto que permita seu questionamento, do contrário não há a possibilidade de levantar dúvidas. Contudo, proposições fulcrais não são absolutas, pois podem vir a ser empíricas e como tal, sofrer novos questionamentos, dentro de contextos específicos. Este artigo visa entender o processo de estruturação e distinção de proposições fulcrais e empíricas, e como elas são aceitas pela comunidade linguística.Universidade Federal do Ceará2013-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19017Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 9Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 9Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 91984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19017/29736Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Batista2021-07-23T22:28:05Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/19017Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-23T22:28:05Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of Wittgenstein
O processo de formação de proposições e a possibilidade da dúvida no Sobre a Certeza de Wittgenstein
title The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of Wittgenstein
spellingShingle The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of Wittgenstein
de Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Batista
Foundationalism. Doubt. Knowledge. Certainty.
Fundacionalismo. Dúvida. Conhecimento. Certeza.
title_short The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of Wittgenstein
title_full The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of Wittgenstein
title_fullStr The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of Wittgenstein
title_full_unstemmed The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of Wittgenstein
title_sort The process of formation of proposals and to the possibility of dúvida no About a Certainty of Wittgenstein
author de Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Batista
author_facet de Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Batista
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Batista
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Foundationalism. Doubt. Knowledge. Certainty.
Fundacionalismo. Dúvida. Conhecimento. Certeza.
topic Foundationalism. Doubt. Knowledge. Certainty.
Fundacionalismo. Dúvida. Conhecimento. Certeza.
description In the book On Certainty, Wittgenstein discusses central epistemological questions, such as the nature and the scope of knowledge, the distinction between knowledge and certainty, the problem of skepticism, and the dynamic of proposition formation. The author distinguishes between propositions that either count as a rule or as empirical. It is suggested that knowledge is different from certainty; the latter serve as ground for knowledge and certainties are expressed by means of hinge propositions. This type of proposition works as foundation for the formulation of empirical propositions. Hinge propositions are exempt from doubt since they are supposed to be assented on certainties. In order to doubt on such propositions, one needs to indicate in what conditions and contexts a doubt can be raised, otherwise the doubt is not allowed. However, hinge propositions are not absolutely doubtless because they can turn into empirical and accordingly, undergo new questionings. This paper aims to understand the formation and the distinction between empirical and hinge propositions and how they become accepted by the linguistic community.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19017
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19017/29736
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 9
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 9
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 9
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068845465206784