Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research Group
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação |
Texto Completo: | https://www.rasi.vr.uff.br/index.php/rasi/article/view/503 |
Resumo: | From the 1990’s onwards, a substantial volume of literature had been published about community of practice (CoP) and many scholars had been investigating their existence and the effectiveness in a variety of settings. In this scenario, this study aims at investigating whether the construction of the knowledge of a PhD research group occurs in the form of a CoP. Using the conceptual approach proposed by Wenger (1998) as an analytical basis, the present study combined multiple investigation methods, namely participant observation, analysis of the content of social media, interview, and questionnaire. Data collected was registered in field diaries which were subsequently analysed (Bardin, 2011). Results indicate that members construct their knowledge in a collaborative and cooperative way. The dimensions proposed by Wenger (1998) to identifying and distinguishing CoPs from other groups were present in the group. The conclusion is that the investigated research group can be classified as a CoP. |
id |
UFF-12_c2e794d15d8b9accc89550787b2ea1b9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.192.168.8.15:article/503 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research GroupComunidades de Prática: : A Construção de Conhecimento em um Grupo de Pesquisapráticas, comunidades de prática, aprendizagem, grupos de pesquisaAdministraçãoComunidades de Práticapractices, communities of practice, learning, research groupsFrom the 1990’s onwards, a substantial volume of literature had been published about community of practice (CoP) and many scholars had been investigating their existence and the effectiveness in a variety of settings. In this scenario, this study aims at investigating whether the construction of the knowledge of a PhD research group occurs in the form of a CoP. Using the conceptual approach proposed by Wenger (1998) as an analytical basis, the present study combined multiple investigation methods, namely participant observation, analysis of the content of social media, interview, and questionnaire. Data collected was registered in field diaries which were subsequently analysed (Bardin, 2011). Results indicate that members construct their knowledge in a collaborative and cooperative way. The dimensions proposed by Wenger (1998) to identifying and distinguishing CoPs from other groups were present in the group. The conclusion is that the investigated research group can be classified as a CoP.A partir da década de 1990, um volume substancial de literatura foi publicado sobre comunidades de prática (CP) e muitos pesquisadores investigaram sua existência e a eficácia em uma variedade de contextos. Nesse cenário, este estudo tem como objetivo investigar se a construção do conhecimento de um grupo de pesquisa de doutorado ocorre na forma de uma CP. Utilizando a abordagem conceitual proposta por Wenger (1998) como base analítica, o presente estudo combinou vários métodos de investigação, como observação participante, análise do conteúdo das mídias sociais, entrevista e questionário. Os dados coletados foram registrados em diários de campo que foram posteriormente analisados ??(Bardin, 2011). Os resultados indicam que os membros constroem seus conhecimentos de forma colaborativa e cooperativa. As dimensões propostas por Wenger (1998) para identificar e distinguir CPs estavam presentes no grupo pesquisado. A conclusão é que o grupo de pesquisa investigado pode ser classificado como uma CP.Universidade Federal Fluminense, Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração (Fluminense Federal University, Master Program in Management)2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.rasi.vr.uff.br/index.php/rasi/article/view/50310.20401/rasi.7.3.503Review of Administration, Society and Innovation; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021): RASI: vol. 7, no. 3; 89-103Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação; v. 7 n. 3 (2021): RASI: vol. 7, no. 3; 89-1032447-8156reponame:Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovaçãoinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFenghttps://www.rasi.vr.uff.br/index.php/rasi/article/view/503/151Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHalicki, ZéliaStadler, AdrianoCunha, Sieglinde KindlMazziotti Bulgacov, Yára Lúcia2021-09-01T12:00:55Zoai:ojs.192.168.8.15:article/503Revistahttps://www.rasi.vr.uff.br/index.php/rasiPUBhttps://www.rasi.vr.uff.br/index.php/rasi/oaiperiodico.rasi@gmail.com || marciomabdalla@gmail.com10.204012447-81562447-8156opendoar:2021-09-01T12:00:55Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research Group Comunidades de Prática: : A Construção de Conhecimento em um Grupo de Pesquisa |
title |
Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research Group |
spellingShingle |
Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research Group Halicki, Zélia práticas, comunidades de prática, aprendizagem, grupos de pesquisa Administração Comunidades de Prática practices, communities of practice, learning, research groups |
title_short |
Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research Group |
title_full |
Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research Group |
title_fullStr |
Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research Group |
title_full_unstemmed |
Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research Group |
title_sort |
Communities of Practice: : The Construction of Knowledge in a Research Group |
author |
Halicki, Zélia |
author_facet |
Halicki, Zélia Stadler, Adriano Cunha, Sieglinde Kindl Mazziotti Bulgacov, Yára Lúcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Stadler, Adriano Cunha, Sieglinde Kindl Mazziotti Bulgacov, Yára Lúcia |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Halicki, Zélia Stadler, Adriano Cunha, Sieglinde Kindl Mazziotti Bulgacov, Yára Lúcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
práticas, comunidades de prática, aprendizagem, grupos de pesquisa Administração Comunidades de Prática practices, communities of practice, learning, research groups |
topic |
práticas, comunidades de prática, aprendizagem, grupos de pesquisa Administração Comunidades de Prática practices, communities of practice, learning, research groups |
description |
From the 1990’s onwards, a substantial volume of literature had been published about community of practice (CoP) and many scholars had been investigating their existence and the effectiveness in a variety of settings. In this scenario, this study aims at investigating whether the construction of the knowledge of a PhD research group occurs in the form of a CoP. Using the conceptual approach proposed by Wenger (1998) as an analytical basis, the present study combined multiple investigation methods, namely participant observation, analysis of the content of social media, interview, and questionnaire. Data collected was registered in field diaries which were subsequently analysed (Bardin, 2011). Results indicate that members construct their knowledge in a collaborative and cooperative way. The dimensions proposed by Wenger (1998) to identifying and distinguishing CoPs from other groups were present in the group. The conclusion is that the investigated research group can be classified as a CoP. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer reviewed Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.rasi.vr.uff.br/index.php/rasi/article/view/503 10.20401/rasi.7.3.503 |
url |
https://www.rasi.vr.uff.br/index.php/rasi/article/view/503 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20401/rasi.7.3.503 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.rasi.vr.uff.br/index.php/rasi/article/view/503/151 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense, Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração (Fluminense Federal University, Master Program in Management) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense, Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração (Fluminense Federal University, Master Program in Management) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Review of Administration, Society and Innovation; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2021): RASI: vol. 7, no. 3; 89-103 Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação; v. 7 n. 3 (2021): RASI: vol. 7, no. 3; 89-103 2447-8156 reponame:Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação |
collection |
Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
periodico.rasi@gmail.com || marciomabdalla@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798325249140326400 |