INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparison

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Filoche, Geoffroy
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Lauriola, Vincenzo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ateliê Geográfico
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16687
Resumo: At the end of the last century, the status of indigenous peoples changed in social representations and political scenes, shifting from isolated communities set apart from development processes to local partners for biodiversity management and environmental conservation. This is the result, amongst other factors, of two processes: the growing legal recognition of these peoples and the evolution of environmental policies re-shaped by sustainable development. In spite of that, a large number of policies derived from the paradigm of “virgin nature” are still in use, feeding old and new socio-environmental conflicts. What are the actual territorial rights conferred to indigenous peoples in Brazil and French Guiana? To what extent, and how, is their own territoriality recognized? And more specifically, to what extent traditional indigenous concepts of space and natural resources appropriation can help creating efficient policies for sustainable management of biodiversity?
id UFG-5_511ededd6942c866be7f658c12cedadc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/16687
network_acronym_str UFG-5
network_name_str Ateliê Geográfico
repository_id_str
spelling INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparisonTERRES INDIGÈNES, PROPRIÉTÉ COMMUNE ET GESTION DE LA BIODIVERSITÉ: une comparaison Brésil – Guyane FrançaiseTerras indígenas, propriedade comum e manejo da biodiversidade: uma comparação Brasil – Guiana Francesa - DOI 10.5216/ag.v4i1.16687At the end of the last century, the status of indigenous peoples changed in social representations and political scenes, shifting from isolated communities set apart from development processes to local partners for biodiversity management and environmental conservation. This is the result, amongst other factors, of two processes: the growing legal recognition of these peoples and the evolution of environmental policies re-shaped by sustainable development. In spite of that, a large number of policies derived from the paradigm of “virgin nature” are still in use, feeding old and new socio-environmental conflicts. What are the actual territorial rights conferred to indigenous peoples in Brazil and French Guiana? To what extent, and how, is their own territoriality recognized? And more specifically, to what extent traditional indigenous concepts of space and natural resources appropriation can help creating efficient policies for sustainable management of biodiversity?A la fin du siècle dernier, les peuples autochtones ont changé de statut dans les représentations sociales et sur les scènes politiques, devenant des « partenaires locaux » dans les politiques de gestion de la biodiversité après avoir été des « communautés isolées » ou des groupes « écartés du développement ». Cela résulte, entre autres facteurs, de la convergence de deux mouvements : une reconnaissance juridique croissante de ces populations, et une évolution des politiques environnementales, redéfinies par le développement durable. Malgré tout, un grand nombre de dispositifs relevant du paradigme antérieur, celui de la « nature vierge », subsistent, alimentant d’anciens et de nouveaux conflits socio-environnementaux. Finalement, quels sont les droits territoriaux dont jouissent effectivement les peuples indigènes, au Brésil et en Guyane française ? Dans quelle mesure, et sous quelle forme, leur territorialité propre est-elle reconnue ? Et plus particulièrement, dans quelle mesure les conceptions traditionnelles d’appropriation de l’espace et des ressources naturelles peuvent-elles aider à la création de dispositifs efficaces de gestion durable de la biodiversité ?No final do ultimo século, os povos indígenas mudaram de estatuto nas representações sociais e nos cenários políticos, passando de “comunidades isoladas” ou grupos “afastados do desenvolvimento” a “parceiros locais” das políticas de manejo da biodiversidade e conservação da natureza. Isso resultou, dentre outros fatores, da convergência de dois movimentos: o reconhecimento político e jurídico crescente dos povos indígenas, e a evolução das políticas ambientais, redefinidas pelo paradigma do desenvolvimento sustentável. Mesmo assim, muitas políticas do paradigma anterior, o da “natureza intocada”, permanecem alimentando a reprodução de antigos e novos conflitos socioambientais. Finalmente, quais os direitos territoriais que os povos indígenas gozam efetivamente, no Brasil e na Guiana francesa? Em que medida e de que forma, lhes é reconhecida sua territorialidade própria? E, mais em particular, em que medida as concepções tradicionais de apropriação do espaço e dos recursos naturais podem ajudar na criação de dispositivos eficazes de manejo sustentável da biodiversidade?Universidade Federal de Goiás2011-12-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/1668710.5216/ag.v4i1.16687Ateliê Geográfico Journal; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2010); 164-195Ateliê Geográfico; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2010); 164-195Ateliê Geográfico; v. 4 n. 1 (2010); 164-1951982-195610.5216/ag.v4i1.%areponame:Ateliê Geográficoinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16687/1013110.5216/ag.v4i1.16687Filoche, GeoffroyLauriola, Vincenzoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-02-07T04:01:44Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/16687Revistahttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/ateliePUBhttps://www.revistas.ufg.br/atelie/oairevista.ateliegeografico@gmail.com || deniscastilho@hotmail.com || laracristineufg@yahoo.com.br1982-19561982-1956opendoar:2024-05-21T19:55:14.148562Ateliê Geográfico - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparison
TERRES INDIGÈNES, PROPRIÉTÉ COMMUNE ET GESTION DE LA BIODIVERSITÉ: une comparaison Brésil – Guyane Française
Terras indígenas, propriedade comum e manejo da biodiversidade: uma comparação Brasil – Guiana Francesa - DOI 10.5216/ag.v4i1.16687
title INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparison
spellingShingle INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparison
Filoche, Geoffroy
title_short INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparison
title_full INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparison
title_fullStr INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparison
title_full_unstemmed INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparison
title_sort INDIGENOUS LANDS, COMMON PROPERTY AND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT: A Brasil – French Guiana comparison
author Filoche, Geoffroy
author_facet Filoche, Geoffroy
Lauriola, Vincenzo
author_role author
author2 Lauriola, Vincenzo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Filoche, Geoffroy
Lauriola, Vincenzo
description At the end of the last century, the status of indigenous peoples changed in social representations and political scenes, shifting from isolated communities set apart from development processes to local partners for biodiversity management and environmental conservation. This is the result, amongst other factors, of two processes: the growing legal recognition of these peoples and the evolution of environmental policies re-shaped by sustainable development. In spite of that, a large number of policies derived from the paradigm of “virgin nature” are still in use, feeding old and new socio-environmental conflicts. What are the actual territorial rights conferred to indigenous peoples in Brazil and French Guiana? To what extent, and how, is their own territoriality recognized? And more specifically, to what extent traditional indigenous concepts of space and natural resources appropriation can help creating efficient policies for sustainable management of biodiversity?
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16687
10.5216/ag.v4i1.16687
url https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16687
identifier_str_mv 10.5216/ag.v4i1.16687
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/atelie/article/view/16687/10131
10.5216/ag.v4i1.16687
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ateliê Geográfico Journal; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2010); 164-195
Ateliê Geográfico; Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2010); 164-195
Ateliê Geográfico; v. 4 n. 1 (2010); 164-195
1982-1956
10.5216/ag.v4i1.%a
reponame:Ateliê Geográfico
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ateliê Geográfico
collection Ateliê Geográfico
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ateliê Geográfico - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.ateliegeografico@gmail.com || deniscastilho@hotmail.com || laracristineufg@yahoo.com.br
_version_ 1799874835370737664

Registros relacionados