User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Inoue, Kelly Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Murassaki, Ana Cláudia Yassuko, Bellucci Júnior, José Aparecido, Rossi, Robson Marcelo, Martinez, Yolanda Dora Évora, Matsuda, Laura Misue
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Reme (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49595
Resumo: The present work is a descriptive and exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, conducted between August and November 2011, aimed at, from the workers' perspective, assessing the Structure, Process, and Result of implementing the Reception with Risk Rating (RRR) instrument. This study included 314 professionals of different professional categories from four Emergency Hospital Services (EHS). The "Instrument to Assess Reception with Risk Rating" was used for data collection. Among the subjects, most were women (63.7 %), from the Nursing field (56.7 %), with an average experience of 7.2±7.6 years in the sector. Although there is a prioritizing of serious cases, care for mild cases, information about the probable waiting time, and user reception by the professionals who work in this system, it was found that, overall, the RRR was considered precarious. The main aggravating factors included: lack of physical space, problems in relationships within the multidisciplinary staff, and difficulty in putting the defined conduct into effect. It could therefore be concluded that, although the essential conduct proposed by RRR was in fact implemented in the investigated emergency services, there is still a need to make this system fully operational.
id UFMG-27_9ba217e4d21dbe677235bb7d8561edc6
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/49595
network_acronym_str UFMG-27
network_name_str Reme (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and resultAcogida con clasificación de riesgo: evaluación de la estructura, del proceso y de los resultadosAcolhimento com classificação de risco: avaliação da estrutura, processo e resultadoAcogimientoHumanización de la AtenciónServicio de Urgencia en HospitalEvaluación en SaludAtención de EnfermeríaAcolhimentoHumanização da AssistênciaServiço Hospitalar de EmergênciaAvaliação em SaúdeCuidados de EnfermagemUser EmbracementHumanization of AssistanceEmergency Service, HospitalHealth EvaluationNursing CareThe present work is a descriptive and exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, conducted between August and November 2011, aimed at, from the workers' perspective, assessing the Structure, Process, and Result of implementing the Reception with Risk Rating (RRR) instrument. This study included 314 professionals of different professional categories from four Emergency Hospital Services (EHS). The "Instrument to Assess Reception with Risk Rating" was used for data collection. Among the subjects, most were women (63.7 %), from the Nursing field (56.7 %), with an average experience of 7.2±7.6 years in the sector. Although there is a prioritizing of serious cases, care for mild cases, information about the probable waiting time, and user reception by the professionals who work in this system, it was found that, overall, the RRR was considered precarious. The main aggravating factors included: lack of physical space, problems in relationships within the multidisciplinary staff, and difficulty in putting the defined conduct into effect. It could therefore be concluded that, although the essential conduct proposed by RRR was in fact implemented in the investigated emergency services, there is still a need to make this system fully operational.Estudio exploratorio descriptivo con enfoque cuantitativo realizado entre agosto y noviembre/2011 con el objetivo de evaluar la estructura, el proceso y el resultado de la implantación de la Acogida con Clasificación de Riesgos (ACCR) desde la perspectiva de los trabajadores. Participaron 314 profesionales de cuatro servicios de urgencias hospitalarias (SUH) de diferentes categorías profesionales. Para la recogida de datos se utilizó el "Instrumento para Evaluación de la Acogida con Clasificación de Riesgos". La mayoría eran mujeres (63,7%) del área de enfermería (56,7 %); con experiencia media de 7.2±7.6 años en dicho sector. A pesar de haber prioridad para los casos graves; atención de casos no graves; información sobre el tiempo probable de espera y acogida del usuario por los profesionales que trabajan en este sistema, se constató que, en general, la Acogida con Clasificación de Riesgos fue evaluada como Precaria. Los principales agravantes detectados fueron: falta de espacio físico, problemas en la relación entre el equipo multidisciplinario y dificultad para poner en práctica las conductas establecidas. Se concluye que, aunque en los Servicios de Urgencia investigados se cumplan las conductas fundamentales propuestas por la ACCR, este sistema debe ponerse en práctica deforma integral.Estudo descritivo-exploratório, com abordagem quantitativa, realizado entre agosto e novembro/2011, com o objetivo de avaliar sob a ótica dos trabalhadores a estrutura, o processo e o resultado da implantação do acolhimento com classificação de risco (ACCR). Participaram 314 profissionais de quatro serviços hospitalares de emergência (SHE) de diferentes categorias profissionais. Para a coleta de dados foi usado o "Instrumento para Avaliação do Acolhimento com Classificação de Risco". Entre os sujeitos, a maioria era mulher (63,7%); da área de Enfermagem (56,7%); com experiência média de 7,2±7,6 anos no setor. Apesar de haver priorização dos casos graves; atendimento aos casos não graves; informação sobre o tempo provável de espera; e acolhimento do usuário pelos profissionais que atuam nesse sistema, constatou-se que no cômputo geral o acolhimento com classificação de risco foi avaliado como precário. Como principais agravantes detectaram-se: falta de espaço físico; problemas no relacionamento da equipe multiprofissional; e dificuldade na operacionalização das condutas estabelecidas. Concluiu-se que, apesar de nos serviços de emergência investigados as condutas fundamentais propostas pelo ACCR serem realizadas, há necessidade da operacionalização integral desse sistema.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/plainapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/4959510.5935/1415-2762.20150002REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2015)REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2015)REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem; v. 19 n. 1 (2015)2316-93891415-2762reponame:Reme (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49595/39747https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49595/39748https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49595/39749Copyright (c) 2015 Reme: Revista Mineira de Enfermageminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInoue, Kelly CristinaMurassaki, Ana Cláudia YassukoBellucci Júnior, José AparecidoRossi, Robson MarceloMartinez, Yolanda Dora ÉvoraMatsuda, Laura Misue2024-01-22T19:17:05Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/49595Revistaremeufmg@gmail.comPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/oairemeufmg@gmail.com2316-93891415-2762opendoar:2024-01-22T19:17:05Reme (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result
Acogida con clasificación de riesgo: evaluación de la estructura, del proceso y de los resultados
Acolhimento com classificação de risco: avaliação da estrutura, processo e resultado
title User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result
spellingShingle User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result
Inoue, Kelly Cristina
Acogimiento
Humanización de la Atención
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
Evaluación en Salud
Atención de Enfermería
Acolhimento
Humanização da Assistência
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
Avaliação em Saúde
Cuidados de Enfermagem
User Embracement
Humanization of Assistance
Emergency Service, Hospital
Health Evaluation
Nursing Care
title_short User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result
title_full User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result
title_fullStr User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result
title_full_unstemmed User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result
title_sort User embracement with risk rating: evaluation of the structure, process, and result
author Inoue, Kelly Cristina
author_facet Inoue, Kelly Cristina
Murassaki, Ana Cláudia Yassuko
Bellucci Júnior, José Aparecido
Rossi, Robson Marcelo
Martinez, Yolanda Dora Évora
Matsuda, Laura Misue
author_role author
author2 Murassaki, Ana Cláudia Yassuko
Bellucci Júnior, José Aparecido
Rossi, Robson Marcelo
Martinez, Yolanda Dora Évora
Matsuda, Laura Misue
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Inoue, Kelly Cristina
Murassaki, Ana Cláudia Yassuko
Bellucci Júnior, José Aparecido
Rossi, Robson Marcelo
Martinez, Yolanda Dora Évora
Matsuda, Laura Misue
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acogimiento
Humanización de la Atención
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
Evaluación en Salud
Atención de Enfermería
Acolhimento
Humanização da Assistência
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
Avaliação em Saúde
Cuidados de Enfermagem
User Embracement
Humanization of Assistance
Emergency Service, Hospital
Health Evaluation
Nursing Care
topic Acogimiento
Humanización de la Atención
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
Evaluación en Salud
Atención de Enfermería
Acolhimento
Humanização da Assistência
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
Avaliação em Saúde
Cuidados de Enfermagem
User Embracement
Humanization of Assistance
Emergency Service, Hospital
Health Evaluation
Nursing Care
description The present work is a descriptive and exploratory study, with a quantitative approach, conducted between August and November 2011, aimed at, from the workers' perspective, assessing the Structure, Process, and Result of implementing the Reception with Risk Rating (RRR) instrument. This study included 314 professionals of different professional categories from four Emergency Hospital Services (EHS). The "Instrument to Assess Reception with Risk Rating" was used for data collection. Among the subjects, most were women (63.7 %), from the Nursing field (56.7 %), with an average experience of 7.2±7.6 years in the sector. Although there is a prioritizing of serious cases, care for mild cases, information about the probable waiting time, and user reception by the professionals who work in this system, it was found that, overall, the RRR was considered precarious. The main aggravating factors included: lack of physical space, problems in relationships within the multidisciplinary staff, and difficulty in putting the defined conduct into effect. It could therefore be concluded that, although the essential conduct proposed by RRR was in fact implemented in the investigated emergency services, there is still a need to make this system fully operational.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49595
10.5935/1415-2762.20150002
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49595
identifier_str_mv 10.5935/1415-2762.20150002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49595/39747
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49595/39748
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/reme/article/view/49595/39749
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Reme: Revista Mineira de Enfermagem
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Reme: Revista Mineira de Enfermagem
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/plain
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2015)
REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2015)
REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem; v. 19 n. 1 (2015)
2316-9389
1415-2762
reponame:Reme (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Reme (Online)
collection Reme (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Reme (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv remeufmg@gmail.com
_version_ 1797041902398210048