INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vellinho Corso, Helena
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Mayer Nunes, Débora, Fulginiti de Assis, Évelin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Educação em Revista
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/25098
Resumo: The theory and research in reading comprehension (RC) make it clear that this ability doesn’t result automatically from the capacity of decoding a text because it involves linguistic and cognitive components that need to operate together with decoding fluency. Therefore, the ability to understand must be seen as an object of teaching and must be pursued by school instruction. Intervention studies – and the meta-analysis on them – indicate effective  interventions for fostering the ability. However, the application of scientific evidence to teacher’s practice in the classroom is not simple or immediate, and requires new elaboration. This integrative review article examines a group of meta-analyses about intervention studies in RC, in order to verify the types of instruction analyzed, it’s effectiveness and the main aspects that impacted this effect. Highlights among the findings: the teaching of strategies favors all students profiles (with or without difficulties or at risk); there are more recommended strategies than others, such as setting reading goals (facilitates the monitoring), asking questions about the text (during the reading, by the teacher and the students), using written activities about the text. Furthermore, there is an important moderator effect related to who applies the instruction: the effectiveness diminishes when the teacher is the applicator. The complexity of the application and the preparation it requires indicate that as important as the development of programs in CL is the training of teachers who will implement them.
id UFMG-5_106b9bde926ab4daa4db1b970f26d80e
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/25098
network_acronym_str UFMG-5
network_name_str Educação em Revista
repository_id_str
spelling INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?INSTRUCCIONES PARA LEER ENTENDIMIENTO EN EL AULA: ¿QUÉ PODEMOS APRENDER DEL META-ANÁLISIS?INSTRUÇÃO EM COMPREENSÃO DE LEITURA NA SALA DE AULA: O QUE PODEMOS APRENDER COM AS META-ANÁLISES?Compreensão de LeituraMeta-análiseIntervençãoReading ComprehensionMeta-analysisInterventionComprensión de LecturaMetaanálisisIntervenciónThe theory and research in reading comprehension (RC) make it clear that this ability doesn’t result automatically from the capacity of decoding a text because it involves linguistic and cognitive components that need to operate together with decoding fluency. Therefore, the ability to understand must be seen as an object of teaching and must be pursued by school instruction. Intervention studies – and the meta-analysis on them – indicate effective  interventions for fostering the ability. However, the application of scientific evidence to teacher’s practice in the classroom is not simple or immediate, and requires new elaboration. This integrative review article examines a group of meta-analyses about intervention studies in RC, in order to verify the types of instruction analyzed, it’s effectiveness and the main aspects that impacted this effect. Highlights among the findings: the teaching of strategies favors all students profiles (with or without difficulties or at risk); there are more recommended strategies than others, such as setting reading goals (facilitates the monitoring), asking questions about the text (during the reading, by the teacher and the students), using written activities about the text. Furthermore, there is an important moderator effect related to who applies the instruction: the effectiveness diminishes when the teacher is the applicator. The complexity of the application and the preparation it requires indicate that as important as the development of programs in CL is the training of teachers who will implement them.La teoría y la investigación en comprensión de lectura (CL) aclaran que la capacidad no resulta automáticamente de la capacidad de decodificar un texto, ya que involucra componentes lingüísticos y cognitivos que deben operar junto con una decodificación fluida. Por lo tanto, la capacidad de entender debe verse como un objeto de enseñanza y debe ser el objetivo de la instrucción escolar. La investigación de intervención, y los metaanálisis sobre ella, indican las propuestas de instrucción que favorecen el desarrollo de la habilidad. Sin embargo, la aplicación de evidencia científica a la práctica del maestro en el aula no es simple ni inmediata, y requiere una nueva elaboración. Este artículo de revisión integradora analiza una serie de metaanálisis sobre investigaciones de intervención en CL, con el objetivo de verificar los tipos de instrucción estudiados, su efectividad y los principales aspectos que han impactado este efecto. Entre los hallazgos, se destacan los siguientes: la enseñanza de estrategias favorece todos los perfiles de los estudiantes; existen estrategias más recomendadas que otras, como el establecimiento previo del objetivo de lectura, la formulación de preguntas sobre el texto, el uso de actividades de escritura en el texto. Aún así, hay un efecto moderador importante de quienes aplican la instrucción: la efectividad disminuye cuando es el maestro quien la aplica. La complejidad de la aplicación y la preparación que requiere indican que tan importante cuanto el desarrollo de programas en CL es la capacitación de los maestros que la implementarán.A teoria e a pesquisa em compreensão de leitura (CL) deixam claro que a habilidade não decorre automaticamente da capacidade de decodificar um texto, pois envolve componentes linguísticos e cognitivos que precisam operar junto com a decodificação fluente. Por isso a habilidade de compreender precisa ser encarada como um objeto de ensino, e deve ser alvo de instrução escolar. Pesquisas de intervenção – e meta-análises sobre elas - indicam as propostas instrucionais que favorecem o desenvolvimento da habilidade. Entretanto, a aplicação da evidência científica para a prática do professor em sala de aula não é simples nem imediata, e requer nova elaboração. Este artigo de revisão integrativa examina um conjunto de meta-análises de estudos de intervenção em CL, com o objetivo de verificar os tipos de instrução analisados, sua efetividade e os principais aspectos que impactaram esse efeito. Destacam-se entre os achados: o ensino de estratégias favorece todos os perfis de alunos (sem ou com dificuldades, ou sob risco); há estratégias mais recomendadas que outras, como o estabelecimento prévio do objetivo da leitura (facilita o monitoramento), a realização de perguntas sobre o texto (durante a leitura, pelo professor e pelos alunos), e o uso de atividades de escrita sobre o texto.  Ainda, há um efeito moderador importante de quem aplica a instrução: a efetividade diminui quando é o professor quem aplica. A complexidade da aplicação e o preparo que ela requer indicam que tão importante quanto a elaboração de programas em CL é a formação dos professores que irão implementá-lo.Educação em Revista 2023-03-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewedRevisado por paresAvaliado por ParesTextoapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/25098Educação em Revista ; v. 39 (2023)1982-66210102-4698reponame:Educação em Revistainstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/25098/37166https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/25098/37167Copyright (c) 2023 Educação em Revista https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVellinho Corso, HelenaMayer Nunes, DéboraFulginiti de Assis, Évelin2023-07-19T13:49:07Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/25098Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/oai||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br1982-66210102-4698opendoar:2023-07-19T13:49:07Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?
INSTRUCCIONES PARA LEER ENTENDIMIENTO EN EL AULA: ¿QUÉ PODEMOS APRENDER DEL META-ANÁLISIS?
INSTRUÇÃO EM COMPREENSÃO DE LEITURA NA SALA DE AULA: O QUE PODEMOS APRENDER COM AS META-ANÁLISES?
title INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?
spellingShingle INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?
Vellinho Corso, Helena
Compreensão de Leitura
Meta-análise
Intervenção
Reading Comprehension
Meta-analysis
Intervention
Comprensión de Lectura
Metaanálisis
Intervención
title_short INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?
title_full INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?
title_fullStr INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?
title_full_unstemmed INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?
title_sort INSTRUCTION IN READING COMPREHENSION IN THE CLASSROOM: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM META-ANALYSIS?
author Vellinho Corso, Helena
author_facet Vellinho Corso, Helena
Mayer Nunes, Débora
Fulginiti de Assis, Évelin
author_role author
author2 Mayer Nunes, Débora
Fulginiti de Assis, Évelin
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vellinho Corso, Helena
Mayer Nunes, Débora
Fulginiti de Assis, Évelin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Compreensão de Leitura
Meta-análise
Intervenção
Reading Comprehension
Meta-analysis
Intervention
Comprensión de Lectura
Metaanálisis
Intervención
topic Compreensão de Leitura
Meta-análise
Intervenção
Reading Comprehension
Meta-analysis
Intervention
Comprensión de Lectura
Metaanálisis
Intervención
description The theory and research in reading comprehension (RC) make it clear that this ability doesn’t result automatically from the capacity of decoding a text because it involves linguistic and cognitive components that need to operate together with decoding fluency. Therefore, the ability to understand must be seen as an object of teaching and must be pursued by school instruction. Intervention studies – and the meta-analysis on them – indicate effective  interventions for fostering the ability. However, the application of scientific evidence to teacher’s practice in the classroom is not simple or immediate, and requires new elaboration. This integrative review article examines a group of meta-analyses about intervention studies in RC, in order to verify the types of instruction analyzed, it’s effectiveness and the main aspects that impacted this effect. Highlights among the findings: the teaching of strategies favors all students profiles (with or without difficulties or at risk); there are more recommended strategies than others, such as setting reading goals (facilitates the monitoring), asking questions about the text (during the reading, by the teacher and the students), using written activities about the text. Furthermore, there is an important moderator effect related to who applies the instruction: the effectiveness diminishes when the teacher is the applicator. The complexity of the application and the preparation it requires indicate that as important as the development of programs in CL is the training of teachers who will implement them.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer reviewed
Revisado por pares
Avaliado por Pares
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/25098
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/25098
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/25098/37166
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/edrevista/article/view/25098/37167
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Educação em Revista
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Educação em Revista
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista ; v. 39 (2023)
1982-6621
0102-4698
reponame:Educação em Revista
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Educação em Revista
collection Educação em Revista
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação em Revista - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sergiocirino99@yahoo.com|| revista@fae.ufmg.br
_version_ 1799711122538889216