Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional Universidade Franciscana |
Texto Completo: | http://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/handle/UFN-BDTD/769 |
Resumo: | This study aims to study the English textbooks adopted in Elementary School at the Military School of Santa Maria, considering the requirements in the documents of selection of textbooks for the English language. This research is a documentary analysis of qualitative approach. To carry out the research, we used the concept of multiliteracies according to the New London Group (1996); Soares (1998); Cope & Kalantzis (2000); Rojo (2012). The object of this study are the textbooks Uncover 1 and American English File 1. Data collection is done through a survey research and two documents: PNLD and PSD. The use of textbooks, both in public schools and private schools, is frequent in Brazil. However, in order to have an effective learning tool, teachers need to be able to choose the most appropriate textbook for their teaching practice context and for the changes our society has been going through. The Brazilian Textbook Program highlights that the textbooks need to follow the needs of the current school. The English Language Teaching Plans, created by the Brazilian Military School System and sent to the Military Schools, don’t guide in terms of textbook choices because the purpose of this document is to help teachers make their teaching plans for school year. Thus, we used the general guidelines from the English Language Teaching Plans and the competencies and abilities listed in the teaching plans in order to make a parallel with the criteria highlighted in the Guide of the Brazilian Textbook Program. After analyzing both textbooks Uncover 1 and American English File 1, we concluded that both meet the requirements of most of the 167 criteria distributed in 12 categories of the Guide of the Brazilian Textbook Program. The study showed that in both textbooks, 18 out of 167 criteria were not observed, 7 out of 167 were partially observed, and 10 out of 167 were observed in Uncover 1, but not in American English File 1. The suggestions we proposed for the choice of a textbook was based on the Military School teaching and pedagogical proposal, on the English Language Teaching Plans of the Brazilian Military School System and on the Brazilian Textbook Program. It aims to help guide the choice of a textbook, which is a decision that needs to be really coherent to the teaching practice context. |
id |
UFN-1_116c35e1576d886e9a0a8936f5c8649b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:UFN-BDTD/769 |
network_acronym_str |
UFN-1 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional Universidade Franciscana |
repository_id_str |
http://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/oai/request |
spelling |
Bortoluzzi, Valéria IensenKist, Liane BatistelaBevilaqua, RaquelPinheiro, Najara FerrariSouza, Luciane Garcia Gauthier de2019-07-11T14:20:42Z2019-03-28Souza, Luciane Garcia Gauthier de. Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras. 2019. 385f. Dissertação( Mestrado Acadêmico em Ensino de Humanidades e Linguagens) - Universidade Franciscana, Santa Maria - RS .http://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/handle/UFN-BDTD/769This study aims to study the English textbooks adopted in Elementary School at the Military School of Santa Maria, considering the requirements in the documents of selection of textbooks for the English language. This research is a documentary analysis of qualitative approach. To carry out the research, we used the concept of multiliteracies according to the New London Group (1996); Soares (1998); Cope & Kalantzis (2000); Rojo (2012). The object of this study are the textbooks Uncover 1 and American English File 1. Data collection is done through a survey research and two documents: PNLD and PSD. The use of textbooks, both in public schools and private schools, is frequent in Brazil. However, in order to have an effective learning tool, teachers need to be able to choose the most appropriate textbook for their teaching practice context and for the changes our society has been going through. The Brazilian Textbook Program highlights that the textbooks need to follow the needs of the current school. The English Language Teaching Plans, created by the Brazilian Military School System and sent to the Military Schools, don’t guide in terms of textbook choices because the purpose of this document is to help teachers make their teaching plans for school year. Thus, we used the general guidelines from the English Language Teaching Plans and the competencies and abilities listed in the teaching plans in order to make a parallel with the criteria highlighted in the Guide of the Brazilian Textbook Program. After analyzing both textbooks Uncover 1 and American English File 1, we concluded that both meet the requirements of most of the 167 criteria distributed in 12 categories of the Guide of the Brazilian Textbook Program. The study showed that in both textbooks, 18 out of 167 criteria were not observed, 7 out of 167 were partially observed, and 10 out of 167 were observed in Uncover 1, but not in American English File 1. The suggestions we proposed for the choice of a textbook was based on the Military School teaching and pedagogical proposal, on the English Language Teaching Plans of the Brazilian Military School System and on the Brazilian Textbook Program. It aims to help guide the choice of a textbook, which is a decision that needs to be really coherent to the teaching practice context.Este estudo propõe-se em analisar se os livros didáticos de língua inglesa adotados no Colégio Militar de Santa Maria, no Ensino Fundamental, atendem às demandas presentes nos documentos norteadores da seleção de material didático para Língua Inglesa. Esta pesquisa caracteriza-se como uma análise documental de abordagem qualitativa. Para a realização da pesquisa, utilizamos a concepção de multiletramentos segundo o New London Group (1996); Soares (1998); Cope & Kalantzis (2000); Rojo (2012). A amostra é composta pelos LDLI Uncover 1 e American English File 1. A coleta de dados é dada por meio de uma pesquisa survey e dos documentos PNLD e PSD. A adoção de livros didáticos (LD), tanto em escolas públicas como em escolas privadas, é frequente no Brasil. Porém, para que o LD funcione como efetivo instrumento de aprendizagem, o professor precisa ter condições de fazer a escolha do LD que mais se adeque ao contexto de prática docente em que está inserido e às mudanças pelas quais a educação e a sociedade têm passado. O Programa Nacional do Livro Didático (PNLD) ressalta a necessidade de os LDLI acompanharem as necessidades da escola atual. Os Planos de Sequências Didáticas (PSD) de Língua Inglesa, produzido pelo Sistema Colégio Militar do Brasil e disponibilizado nas escolas do Sistema, não apresenta orientações para essa escolha porque o objetivo desse documento é a elaboração de sequências didáticas. Com isso, utilizamos as orientações gerais dos PSD e as competências e habilidades relacionadas nas sequências didáticas a fim de fazer um paralelo com os critérios destacados no Guia do PNLD. Após análise dos LDLI objetos desse estudo, verificamos que ambos cumprem com as demandas da maioria dos critérios do PNLD e observações dos PSD. O estudo mostrou que dos 167 critérios, distribuídos em 12 fichas, em ambos os livros, 18 critérios não foram observados, 7 critérios foram observados parcialmente, e 10 critérios foram observados no Uncover 1, mas não no American English File 1. A proposição de orientações para escolha de LDLI foi baseada na proposta didático-pedagógica do CMSM, no PSD e PNLD e foi feita com o intuito de ajudar a nortear a escolha do livro didático, pois é uma decisão que precisa ser coerente com o contexto educacional no qual o LDLI será usado.Submitted by MARCIA ROVADOSCHI (marciar@unifra.br) on 2019-07-11T14:20:42Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf: 18753206 bytes, checksum: 2bd553bc361d943a92fb9bb06e1f543e (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-07-11T14:20:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf: 18753206 bytes, checksum: 2bd553bc361d943a92fb9bb06e1f543e (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-03-28application/pdfhttp://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/retrieve/4602/Dissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf.jpgporUniversidade FranciscanaMestrado Acadêmico em Ensino de Humanidades e LinguagensUFNBrasilEnsino de Humanidades e Linguagenshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLivro Didático de Inglês. PNLD. PSD. MultiletramentosEnglish Textbooks. Brazilian Textbook Program. English Language Teaching Plans. MultiliteraciesEnsinoAnálise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileirasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisreponame:Repositório Institucional Universidade Franciscanainstname:Universidade Franciscana (UFN)instacron:UFNTHUMBNAILDissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf.jpgDissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3874http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/6/Dissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf.jpg736dad6f4afccc52d69e14ee3d155d3eMD56TEXTDissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf.txtDissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf.txttext/plain360250http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/7/Dissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf.txtd681f5496b06c88159725fa845cf10cfMD57ORIGINALDissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdfDissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdfapplication/pdf18753206http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/5/Dissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf2bd553bc361d943a92fb9bb06e1f543eMD55CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/2/license_url4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/3/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/4/license_rdfd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8310http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/1/license.txt7dc66ddb96829ff34b56b1a92c851bcdMD51UFN-BDTD/7692019-07-14 01:01:03.707oai:tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:UFN-BDTD/769RXN0ZSB0cmFiYWxobyBzZXLDoSBsaWNlbmNpYWRvIHNvYiBhIExpY2Vuw6dhIEF0cmlidWnDp8Ojby1Ow6NvQ29tZXJjaWFsLVNlbURlcml2YcOnw7VlcyA0LjAgSW50ZXJuYWNpb25hbCBDcmVhdGl2ZSBDb21tb25zLiBQYXJhIHZpc3VhbGl6YXIgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBkZXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYSwgdmlzaXRlIGh0dHA6Ly9jcmVhdGl2ZWNvbW1vbnMub3JnL2xpY2Vuc2VzL2J5LW5jLW5kLzQuMC8gb3UgbWFuZGUgdW1hIGNhcnRhIHBhcmEgQ3JlYXRpdmUgQ29tbW9ucywgUE8gQm94IDE4NjYsIE1vdW50YWluIFZpZXcsIENBIDk0MDQyLCBVU0EuCg==Repositório de Publicaçõeshttp://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/http://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/oai/requestopendoar:2019-07-14T04:01:03Repositório Institucional Universidade Franciscana - Universidade Franciscana (UFN)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras |
title |
Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras |
spellingShingle |
Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras Souza, Luciane Garcia Gauthier de Livro Didático de Inglês. PNLD. PSD. Multiletramentos English Textbooks. Brazilian Textbook Program. English Language Teaching Plans. Multiliteracies Ensino |
title_short |
Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras |
title_full |
Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras |
title_fullStr |
Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras |
title_full_unstemmed |
Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras |
title_sort |
Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras |
author |
Souza, Luciane Garcia Gauthier de |
author_facet |
Souza, Luciane Garcia Gauthier de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Bortoluzzi, Valéria Iensen |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Kist, Liane Batistela |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Bevilaqua, Raquel |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Pinheiro, Najara Ferrari |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Luciane Garcia Gauthier de |
contributor_str_mv |
Bortoluzzi, Valéria Iensen Kist, Liane Batistela Bevilaqua, Raquel Pinheiro, Najara Ferrari |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Livro Didático de Inglês. PNLD. PSD. Multiletramentos |
topic |
Livro Didático de Inglês. PNLD. PSD. Multiletramentos English Textbooks. Brazilian Textbook Program. English Language Teaching Plans. Multiliteracies Ensino |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
English Textbooks. Brazilian Textbook Program. English Language Teaching Plans. Multiliteracies |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
Ensino |
description |
This study aims to study the English textbooks adopted in Elementary School at the Military School of Santa Maria, considering the requirements in the documents of selection of textbooks for the English language. This research is a documentary analysis of qualitative approach. To carry out the research, we used the concept of multiliteracies according to the New London Group (1996); Soares (1998); Cope & Kalantzis (2000); Rojo (2012). The object of this study are the textbooks Uncover 1 and American English File 1. Data collection is done through a survey research and two documents: PNLD and PSD. The use of textbooks, both in public schools and private schools, is frequent in Brazil. However, in order to have an effective learning tool, teachers need to be able to choose the most appropriate textbook for their teaching practice context and for the changes our society has been going through. The Brazilian Textbook Program highlights that the textbooks need to follow the needs of the current school. The English Language Teaching Plans, created by the Brazilian Military School System and sent to the Military Schools, don’t guide in terms of textbook choices because the purpose of this document is to help teachers make their teaching plans for school year. Thus, we used the general guidelines from the English Language Teaching Plans and the competencies and abilities listed in the teaching plans in order to make a parallel with the criteria highlighted in the Guide of the Brazilian Textbook Program. After analyzing both textbooks Uncover 1 and American English File 1, we concluded that both meet the requirements of most of the 167 criteria distributed in 12 categories of the Guide of the Brazilian Textbook Program. The study showed that in both textbooks, 18 out of 167 criteria were not observed, 7 out of 167 were partially observed, and 10 out of 167 were observed in Uncover 1, but not in American English File 1. The suggestions we proposed for the choice of a textbook was based on the Military School teaching and pedagogical proposal, on the English Language Teaching Plans of the Brazilian Military School System and on the Brazilian Textbook Program. It aims to help guide the choice of a textbook, which is a decision that needs to be really coherent to the teaching practice context. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-11T14:20:42Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-28 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Luciane Garcia Gauthier de. Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras. 2019. 385f. Dissertação( Mestrado Acadêmico em Ensino de Humanidades e Linguagens) - Universidade Franciscana, Santa Maria - RS . |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/handle/UFN-BDTD/769 |
identifier_str_mv |
Souza, Luciane Garcia Gauthier de. Análise de livros didáticos de inglês à luz dos documentos que norteiam os critérios de escolha de LDLI nas escolas públicas brasileiras. 2019. 385f. Dissertação( Mestrado Acadêmico em Ensino de Humanidades e Linguagens) - Universidade Franciscana, Santa Maria - RS . |
url |
http://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/handle/UFN-BDTD/769 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Franciscana |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Mestrado Acadêmico em Ensino de Humanidades e Linguagens |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFN |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Ensino de Humanidades e Linguagens |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Franciscana |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional Universidade Franciscana instname:Universidade Franciscana (UFN) instacron:UFN |
instname_str |
Universidade Franciscana (UFN) |
instacron_str |
UFN |
institution |
UFN |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional Universidade Franciscana |
collection |
Repositório Institucional Universidade Franciscana |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/6/Dissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf.jpg http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/7/Dissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf.txt http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/5/Dissertacao_LucianeGarciaGauthierDeSouza.pdf http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/2/license_url http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/3/license_text http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/4/license_rdf http://tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/bitstream/UFN-BDTD/769/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
736dad6f4afccc52d69e14ee3d155d3e d681f5496b06c88159725fa845cf10cf 2bd553bc361d943a92fb9bb06e1f543e 4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 7dc66ddb96829ff34b56b1a92c851bcd |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional Universidade Franciscana - Universidade Franciscana (UFN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1809269401432621056 |