Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564 |
Resumo: | This article aims at pointing out which teaching approach to writing predominates in PNLD English coursebooks for the last year of Elementary school. It starts from ideas about three main approaches to the teaching of writing - writing as product, as process and as social practice - and the assumptions of Transitivity within Systemic-Functional Grammar to analyze the linguistic choices present in the proposals for written production activities. It is assumed the analysis of these verbal choices in the instructions of the activities evidences the approach for the teaching of writing adopted to engage the student in social activities of textual production. It is justified that the teacher’s awareness of this approach can help him /her in accepting, rejecting or adapting the proposal. Activities of three books from different editions of the PNLD are analyzed, and the data show the predominance of writing as process, and of material actions required from students in the analyzed proposals. The implications are: evident relevance of the Transitivity System for the analysis of textbook activities, consequently the need to disseminate the supporting theory in teacher education, the vision of writing as a creative and transforming action, and the importance of teachers’ and students’ actions of in pedagogical practice. |
id |
UFPR-12_76233967d819aaf300ad8b262c6d183f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1564 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?Análise das atividades de produção escrita em livros didáticos de inglês do PNLD à luz do sistema de transitividade: que abordagem predomina?Ensino de EscritaTransitividadeLivro DidáticoWriting TeachingTransitivityCoursebookThis article aims at pointing out which teaching approach to writing predominates in PNLD English coursebooks for the last year of Elementary school. It starts from ideas about three main approaches to the teaching of writing - writing as product, as process and as social practice - and the assumptions of Transitivity within Systemic-Functional Grammar to analyze the linguistic choices present in the proposals for written production activities. It is assumed the analysis of these verbal choices in the instructions of the activities evidences the approach for the teaching of writing adopted to engage the student in social activities of textual production. It is justified that the teacher’s awareness of this approach can help him /her in accepting, rejecting or adapting the proposal. Activities of three books from different editions of the PNLD are analyzed, and the data show the predominance of writing as process, and of material actions required from students in the analyzed proposals. The implications are: evident relevance of the Transitivity System for the analysis of textbook activities, consequently the need to disseminate the supporting theory in teacher education, the vision of writing as a creative and transforming action, and the importance of teachers’ and students’ actions of in pedagogical practice.Este artigo tem como objetivo apontar que abordagem de ensino de escrita predomina em livros didáticos de inglês do PNLD para o final do Ensino Fundamental. Parte-se de ideias sobre três principais abordagens de ensino de escrita – escrita como produto, como processo e como prática social – e dos pressupostos do Sistema de Transitividade da Gramática Sistêmico-Funcional para análise das escolhas linguísticas presentes nas propostas de atividades de produção escrita. Acredita-se que a análise dessas escolhas verbais nas instruções das atividades evidencia a abordagem de ensino de escrita adotada para engajar o aluno em atividades sociais de produção textual. Justifica-se que ter consciência dessa abordagem pode auxiliar o professor no aceite, na rejeição ou em adaptações da proposta. Analisam-se atividades de três obras de diferentes edições do PNLD, e os dados mostram o predomínio da abordagem de escrita como processo, e de ações materiais requeridas de alunos nas propostas analisadas. As implicações são: a evidência da pertinência do Sistema de Transitividade para a análise de atividades de livros didáticos, consequentemente a necessidade de divulgação da teoria de suporte na formação docente, a visão de escrever como ação criadora e transformadora, e a importância das ações de professores e alunos no fazer pedagógico.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2020-10-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTExtoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/156410.25189/rabralin.v19i1.1564Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 1 (2020); 1-23Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 1 (2020); 1-230102-715810.25189/rabralin.v19i1reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564/1812https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564/1823Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Abralininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Charles André da Silva, Renato Caixeta da2020-12-14T18:11:28Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1564Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2020-12-14T18:11:28Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates? Análise das atividades de produção escrita em livros didáticos de inglês do PNLD à luz do sistema de transitividade: que abordagem predomina? |
title |
Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates? |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates? Silva, Charles André da Ensino de Escrita Transitividade Livro Didático Writing Teaching Transitivity Coursebook |
title_short |
Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates? |
title_full |
Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates? |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates? |
title_sort |
Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates? |
author |
Silva, Charles André da |
author_facet |
Silva, Charles André da Silva, Renato Caixeta da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Renato Caixeta da |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Charles André da Silva, Renato Caixeta da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ensino de Escrita Transitividade Livro Didático Writing Teaching Transitivity Coursebook |
topic |
Ensino de Escrita Transitividade Livro Didático Writing Teaching Transitivity Coursebook |
description |
This article aims at pointing out which teaching approach to writing predominates in PNLD English coursebooks for the last year of Elementary school. It starts from ideas about three main approaches to the teaching of writing - writing as product, as process and as social practice - and the assumptions of Transitivity within Systemic-Functional Grammar to analyze the linguistic choices present in the proposals for written production activities. It is assumed the analysis of these verbal choices in the instructions of the activities evidences the approach for the teaching of writing adopted to engage the student in social activities of textual production. It is justified that the teacher’s awareness of this approach can help him /her in accepting, rejecting or adapting the proposal. Activities of three books from different editions of the PNLD are analyzed, and the data show the predominance of writing as process, and of material actions required from students in the analyzed proposals. The implications are: evident relevance of the Transitivity System for the analysis of textbook activities, consequently the need to disseminate the supporting theory in teacher education, the vision of writing as a creative and transforming action, and the importance of teachers’ and students’ actions of in pedagogical practice. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion TExto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564 10.25189/rabralin.v19i1.1564 |
url |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25189/rabralin.v19i1.1564 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564/1812 https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564/1823 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Abralin info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Abralin |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 1 (2020); 1-23 Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 1 (2020); 1-23 0102-7158 10.25189/rabralin.v19i1 reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org |
_version_ |
1798329770744741888 |