Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Charles André da
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Renato Caixeta da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564
Resumo: This article aims at pointing out which teaching approach to writing predominates in PNLD English coursebooks for the last year of Elementary school. It starts from ideas about three main approaches to the teaching of writing - writing as product, as process and as social practice - and the assumptions of Transitivity within Systemic-Functional Grammar to analyze the linguistic choices present in the proposals for written production activities. It is assumed the analysis of these verbal choices in the instructions of the activities evidences the approach for the teaching of writing adopted to engage the student in social activities of textual production. It is justified that the teacher’s awareness of this approach can help him /her in accepting, rejecting or adapting the proposal. Activities of three books from different editions of the PNLD are analyzed, and the data show the predominance of writing as process, and of material actions required from students in the analyzed proposals. The implications are: evident relevance of the Transitivity System for the analysis of textbook activities, consequently the need to disseminate the supporting theory in teacher education, the vision of writing as a creative and transforming action, and the importance of teachers’ and students’ actions of in pedagogical practice.
id UFPR-12_76233967d819aaf300ad8b262c6d183f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1564
network_acronym_str UFPR-12
network_name_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?Análise das atividades de produção escrita em livros didáticos de inglês do PNLD à luz do sistema de transitividade: que abordagem predomina?Ensino de EscritaTransitividadeLivro DidáticoWriting TeachingTransitivityCoursebookThis article aims at pointing out which teaching approach to writing predominates in PNLD English coursebooks for the last year of Elementary school. It starts from ideas about three main approaches to the teaching of writing - writing as product, as process and as social practice - and the assumptions of Transitivity within Systemic-Functional Grammar to analyze the linguistic choices present in the proposals for written production activities. It is assumed the analysis of these verbal choices in the instructions of the activities evidences the approach for the teaching of writing adopted to engage the student in social activities of textual production. It is justified that the teacher’s awareness of this approach can help him /her in accepting, rejecting or adapting the proposal. Activities of three books from different editions of the PNLD are analyzed, and the data show the predominance of writing as process, and of material actions required from students in the analyzed proposals. The implications are: evident relevance of the Transitivity System for the analysis of textbook activities, consequently the need to disseminate the supporting theory in teacher education, the vision of writing as a creative and transforming action, and the importance of teachers’ and students’ actions of in pedagogical practice.Este artigo tem como objetivo apontar que abordagem de ensino de escrita predomina em livros didáticos de inglês do PNLD para o final do Ensino Fundamental. Parte-se de ideias sobre três principais abordagens de ensino de escrita – escrita como produto, como processo e como prática social – e dos pressupostos do Sistema de Transitividade da Gramática Sistêmico-Funcional para análise das escolhas linguísticas presentes nas propostas de atividades de produção escrita. Acredita-se que a análise dessas escolhas verbais nas instruções das atividades evidencia a abordagem de ensino de escrita adotada para engajar o aluno em atividades sociais de produção textual. Justifica-se que ter consciência dessa abordagem pode auxiliar o professor no aceite, na rejeição ou em adaptações da proposta. Analisam-se atividades de três obras de diferentes edições do PNLD, e os dados mostram o predomínio da abordagem de escrita como processo, e de ações materiais requeridas de alunos nas propostas analisadas. As implicações são: a evidência da pertinência do Sistema de Transitividade para a análise de atividades de livros didáticos, consequentemente a necessidade de divulgação da teoria de suporte na formação docente, a visão de escrever como ação criadora e transformadora, e a importância das ações de professores e alunos no fazer pedagógico.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2020-10-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTExtoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/156410.25189/rabralin.v19i1.1564Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 1 (2020); 1-23Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 1 (2020); 1-230102-715810.25189/rabralin.v19i1reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564/1812https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564/1823Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Abralininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Charles André da Silva, Renato Caixeta da2020-12-14T18:11:28Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1564Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2020-12-14T18:11:28Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?
Análise das atividades de produção escrita em livros didáticos de inglês do PNLD à luz do sistema de transitividade: que abordagem predomina?
title Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?
spellingShingle Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?
Silva, Charles André da
Ensino de Escrita
Transitividade
Livro Didático
Writing Teaching
Transitivity
Coursebook
title_short Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?
title_full Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?
title_fullStr Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?
title_sort Analysis of writing activities in PNLD English coursebooks under the transitivity system: which approach predominates?
author Silva, Charles André da
author_facet Silva, Charles André da
Silva, Renato Caixeta da
author_role author
author2 Silva, Renato Caixeta da
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Charles André da
Silva, Renato Caixeta da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ensino de Escrita
Transitividade
Livro Didático
Writing Teaching
Transitivity
Coursebook
topic Ensino de Escrita
Transitividade
Livro Didático
Writing Teaching
Transitivity
Coursebook
description This article aims at pointing out which teaching approach to writing predominates in PNLD English coursebooks for the last year of Elementary school. It starts from ideas about three main approaches to the teaching of writing - writing as product, as process and as social practice - and the assumptions of Transitivity within Systemic-Functional Grammar to analyze the linguistic choices present in the proposals for written production activities. It is assumed the analysis of these verbal choices in the instructions of the activities evidences the approach for the teaching of writing adopted to engage the student in social activities of textual production. It is justified that the teacher’s awareness of this approach can help him /her in accepting, rejecting or adapting the proposal. Activities of three books from different editions of the PNLD are analyzed, and the data show the predominance of writing as process, and of material actions required from students in the analyzed proposals. The implications are: evident relevance of the Transitivity System for the analysis of textbook activities, consequently the need to disseminate the supporting theory in teacher education, the vision of writing as a creative and transforming action, and the importance of teachers’ and students’ actions of in pedagogical practice.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
TExto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564
10.25189/rabralin.v19i1.1564
url https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564
identifier_str_mv 10.25189/rabralin.v19i1.1564
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564/1812
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1564/1823
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Abralin
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Abralin
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 1 (2020); 1-23
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 1 (2020); 1-23
0102-7158
10.25189/rabralin.v19i1
reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
collection Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org
_version_ 1798329770744741888