The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Forte-Ferreira, Elaine Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Soares, Juliana Gurgel, Lima-Neto, Vicente
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1966
Resumo: Throughout human history, orality and its elements have a fundamental character in political achievements around the world. Based on an analysis of the interface between Social Semiotics (KRESS, 2010), Conversation Analysis (MARCUSCHI, 2007) and New Rhetoric (PERELMAN; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 2005), we aim to discuss how semiotic resources linked to orality, specifically the kinesic elements, are essential for argumentation and its purposes in political debate, with the aim of persuading a specific audience. To serve the purpose, we developed this analytical exercise in a corpus of a one debate from the second round of the Brazilian elections for the Presidency of the Republic in 2014, televised by Rede Globo. About the methodological procedures, we analyzed the material and selected parts in which we verified how the presidential candidates used these semiotic resources of orality as a persuasive strategy. The results show that kinesic elements, such as body movements, facial expressions, gestures, looks and laughs play important argumentative functions, such as discrediting the opponent and the conviction of points of view defenses, in search for votes.
id UFPR-12_ba453c3d003d06eb273de4f696e16405
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1966
network_acronym_str UFPR-12
network_name_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentationA influência de elementos cinésicos no gênero debate político: aspectos da multimodalidade na argumentaçãoOralidadeGênero debate políticoMultimodalidadeArgumentaçãoOralityPolitical debate genreMultimodalityArgumentationThroughout human history, orality and its elements have a fundamental character in political achievements around the world. Based on an analysis of the interface between Social Semiotics (KRESS, 2010), Conversation Analysis (MARCUSCHI, 2007) and New Rhetoric (PERELMAN; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 2005), we aim to discuss how semiotic resources linked to orality, specifically the kinesic elements, are essential for argumentation and its purposes in political debate, with the aim of persuading a specific audience. To serve the purpose, we developed this analytical exercise in a corpus of a one debate from the second round of the Brazilian elections for the Presidency of the Republic in 2014, televised by Rede Globo. About the methodological procedures, we analyzed the material and selected parts in which we verified how the presidential candidates used these semiotic resources of orality as a persuasive strategy. The results show that kinesic elements, such as body movements, facial expressions, gestures, looks and laughs play important argumentative functions, such as discrediting the opponent and the conviction of points of view defenses, in search for votes.A oralidade e seus elementos têm um caráter fundamental nas conquistas políticas ao redor do mundo, em toda a história da humanidade. À luz de uma análise na interface entre Semiótica Social (KRESS, 2010), Análise da Conversa (MARCUSCHI, 2007) e Nova Retórica (PERELMAN; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 2005), objetivamos discutir como os recursos semióticos atrelados à oralidade, especificamente os elementos cinésicos, se constituem essenciais para a argumentação e seus propósitos no debate político, com o intuito de persuadir um público-alvo. Para atender ao propósito, desenvolvemos esse exercício analítico em um corpus de um debate do segundo turno das eleições brasileiras para a Presidência da República no ano de 2014, televisionado pela Rede Globo. Quanto aos procedimentos metodológicos, analisamos o material e selecionamos excertos em que verificamos como os presidenciáveis se utilizaram desses recursos semióticos da oralidade como estratégia persuasiva. Os resultados apontam que elementos cinésicos, como movimentos corporais, expressões faciais, gestos, olhares e risos desempenham importantes funções argumentativas, como o descrédito do oponente e a convicção dos pontos de vista defendidos, em busca do voto do eleitor.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2022-05-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDossiês Temáticos 2021Textoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/196610.25189/rabralin.v20i3.1966Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 3 (2021); 1550-1570Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 3 (2021); 1550-15700102-715810.25189/rabralin.v20i3reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1966/2595Copyright (c) 2022 Elaine Cristina Forte-Ferreira, Juliana Gurgel Soares, Vicente Lima-Netoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessForte-Ferreira, Elaine CristinaSoares, Juliana GurgelLima-Neto, Vicente2022-05-18T01:20:15Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1966Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2022-05-18T01:20:15Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentation
A influência de elementos cinésicos no gênero debate político: aspectos da multimodalidade na argumentação
title The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentation
spellingShingle The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentation
Forte-Ferreira, Elaine Cristina
Oralidade
Gênero debate político
Multimodalidade
Argumentação
Orality
Political debate genre
Multimodality
Argumentation
title_short The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentation
title_full The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentation
title_fullStr The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentation
title_full_unstemmed The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentation
title_sort The influence of kinesic elements on the political debate genre: aspects of multimodality in argumentation
author Forte-Ferreira, Elaine Cristina
author_facet Forte-Ferreira, Elaine Cristina
Soares, Juliana Gurgel
Lima-Neto, Vicente
author_role author
author2 Soares, Juliana Gurgel
Lima-Neto, Vicente
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Forte-Ferreira, Elaine Cristina
Soares, Juliana Gurgel
Lima-Neto, Vicente
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Oralidade
Gênero debate político
Multimodalidade
Argumentação
Orality
Political debate genre
Multimodality
Argumentation
topic Oralidade
Gênero debate político
Multimodalidade
Argumentação
Orality
Political debate genre
Multimodality
Argumentation
description Throughout human history, orality and its elements have a fundamental character in political achievements around the world. Based on an analysis of the interface between Social Semiotics (KRESS, 2010), Conversation Analysis (MARCUSCHI, 2007) and New Rhetoric (PERELMAN; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 2005), we aim to discuss how semiotic resources linked to orality, specifically the kinesic elements, are essential for argumentation and its purposes in political debate, with the aim of persuading a specific audience. To serve the purpose, we developed this analytical exercise in a corpus of a one debate from the second round of the Brazilian elections for the Presidency of the Republic in 2014, televised by Rede Globo. About the methodological procedures, we analyzed the material and selected parts in which we verified how the presidential candidates used these semiotic resources of orality as a persuasive strategy. The results show that kinesic elements, such as body movements, facial expressions, gestures, looks and laughs play important argumentative functions, such as discrediting the opponent and the conviction of points of view defenses, in search for votes.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Dossiês Temáticos 2021
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1966
10.25189/rabralin.v20i3.1966
url https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1966
identifier_str_mv 10.25189/rabralin.v20i3.1966
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1966/2595
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Elaine Cristina Forte-Ferreira, Juliana Gurgel Soares, Vicente Lima-Neto
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Elaine Cristina Forte-Ferreira, Juliana Gurgel Soares, Vicente Lima-Neto
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 3 (2021); 1550-1570
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 20, N. 3 (2021); 1550-1570
0102-7158
10.25189/rabralin.v20i3
reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
collection Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org
_version_ 1798329771965284352

Registros relacionados