Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Novation |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115 |
Resumo: | This paper provides empirical research demonstrating that there are clear, consistent and repeatable processes at play in social innovation, calling into question the currently hegemonic postmodernist concept of ‘social bricolage’ in social innovation literature. The paper applies a critical realist & systems analysis approach, utilising Checkland’s (1981/2000) Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). The research project investigated 8 neighbourhood and community policing projects using a handbook called Locally identified Solutions & Practices (LISP). LISP was implemented in a range of different social contexts to construct context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) chains (after Pawson, 2013) in a two-step process to identify which social innovation mechanisms contributed to what outcomes in which contexts. The paper reports on empirically based evidence of social innovation processes that do not rely on the characteristics of the individual social entrepreneur or the serendipity of social bricolage ‘freeplay’ (Derrida, 1970). The paper makes the case that social innovation is more than ‘bricolage’ (Derrida, 1970; Di Domenico et al., 2010), not an eclectic mysterious craft of innovation that relies on the skills and characteristics of the social entrepreneur, but instead a systematic, consistent and repeatable process. |
id |
UFPR-18_e3cddb3813b4b0174b7e0db90314ad01 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/91115 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-18 |
network_name_str |
Novation |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable processbricolage; soft systems; community policing; social innovationThis paper provides empirical research demonstrating that there are clear, consistent and repeatable processes at play in social innovation, calling into question the currently hegemonic postmodernist concept of ‘social bricolage’ in social innovation literature. The paper applies a critical realist & systems analysis approach, utilising Checkland’s (1981/2000) Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). The research project investigated 8 neighbourhood and community policing projects using a handbook called Locally identified Solutions & Practices (LISP). LISP was implemented in a range of different social contexts to construct context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) chains (after Pawson, 2013) in a two-step process to identify which social innovation mechanisms contributed to what outcomes in which contexts. The paper reports on empirically based evidence of social innovation processes that do not rely on the characteristics of the individual social entrepreneur or the serendipity of social bricolage ‘freeplay’ (Derrida, 1970). The paper makes the case that social innovation is more than ‘bricolage’ (Derrida, 1970; Di Domenico et al., 2010), not an eclectic mysterious craft of innovation that relies on the skills and characteristics of the social entrepreneur, but instead a systematic, consistent and repeatable process.Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil)Curtis, Timothy2023-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresPeer Reviewedapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/9111510.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91115NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 4 (2022): Critical perspectives in social innovation, social enterprise and/or the social solidarity economy; 89-117NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 4 (2022): Critical perspectives in social innovation, social enterprise and/or the social solidarity economy; 89-1172562-714710.5380/nocsi.v0i4reponame:Novationinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115/49250Copyright (c) 2023 Timothy Curtishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-05-25T02:24:05Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/91115Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/oainovation@ufpr.br2562-71472562-7147opendoar:2024-07-01T12:57:13.123638Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process |
title |
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process |
spellingShingle |
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process Curtis, Timothy bricolage; soft systems; community policing; social innovation |
title_short |
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process |
title_full |
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process |
title_fullStr |
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process |
title_sort |
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process |
author |
Curtis, Timothy |
author_facet |
Curtis, Timothy |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Curtis, Timothy |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bricolage; soft systems; community policing; social innovation |
topic |
bricolage; soft systems; community policing; social innovation |
description |
This paper provides empirical research demonstrating that there are clear, consistent and repeatable processes at play in social innovation, calling into question the currently hegemonic postmodernist concept of ‘social bricolage’ in social innovation literature. The paper applies a critical realist & systems analysis approach, utilising Checkland’s (1981/2000) Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). The research project investigated 8 neighbourhood and community policing projects using a handbook called Locally identified Solutions & Practices (LISP). LISP was implemented in a range of different social contexts to construct context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) chains (after Pawson, 2013) in a two-step process to identify which social innovation mechanisms contributed to what outcomes in which contexts. The paper reports on empirically based evidence of social innovation processes that do not rely on the characteristics of the individual social entrepreneur or the serendipity of social bricolage ‘freeplay’ (Derrida, 1970). The paper makes the case that social innovation is more than ‘bricolage’ (Derrida, 1970; Di Domenico et al., 2010), not an eclectic mysterious craft of innovation that relies on the skills and characteristics of the social entrepreneur, but instead a systematic, consistent and repeatable process. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-18 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares Peer Reviewed |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115 10.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91115 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91115 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115/49250 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Timothy Curtis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Timothy Curtis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 4 (2022): Critical perspectives in social innovation, social enterprise and/or the social solidarity economy; 89-117 NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 4 (2022): Critical perspectives in social innovation, social enterprise and/or the social solidarity economy; 89-117 2562-7147 10.5380/nocsi.v0i4 reponame:Novation instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Novation |
collection |
Novation |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
novation@ufpr.br |
_version_ |
1808579137621721088 |