Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Curtis, Timothy
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Novation
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115
Resumo: This paper provides empirical research demonstrating that there are clear, consistent and repeatable processes at play in social innovation, calling into question the currently hegemonic postmodernist concept of ‘social bricolage’ in social innovation literature. The paper applies a critical realist & systems analysis approach, utilising Checkland’s (1981/2000) Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). The research project investigated 8 neighbourhood and community policing projects using a handbook called Locally identified Solutions & Practices (LISP). LISP was implemented in a range of different social contexts to construct context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) chains (after Pawson, 2013) in a two-step process to identify which social innovation mechanisms contributed to what outcomes in which contexts. The paper reports on empirically based evidence of social innovation processes that do not rely on the characteristics of the individual social entrepreneur or the serendipity of social bricolage ‘freeplay’ (Derrida, 1970). The paper makes the case that social innovation is more than ‘bricolage’ (Derrida, 1970; Di Domenico et al., 2010), not an eclectic mysterious craft of innovation that relies on the skills and characteristics of the social entrepreneur, but instead a systematic, consistent and repeatable process.
id UFPR-18_e3cddb3813b4b0174b7e0db90314ad01
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/91115
network_acronym_str UFPR-18
network_name_str Novation
repository_id_str
spelling Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable processbricolage; soft systems; community policing; social innovationThis paper provides empirical research demonstrating that there are clear, consistent and repeatable processes at play in social innovation, calling into question the currently hegemonic postmodernist concept of ‘social bricolage’ in social innovation literature. The paper applies a critical realist & systems analysis approach, utilising Checkland’s (1981/2000) Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). The research project investigated 8 neighbourhood and community policing projects using a handbook called Locally identified Solutions & Practices (LISP). LISP was implemented in a range of different social contexts to construct context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) chains (after Pawson, 2013) in a two-step process to identify which social innovation mechanisms contributed to what outcomes in which contexts. The paper reports on empirically based evidence of social innovation processes that do not rely on the characteristics of the individual social entrepreneur or the serendipity of social bricolage ‘freeplay’ (Derrida, 1970). The paper makes the case that social innovation is more than ‘bricolage’ (Derrida, 1970; Di Domenico et al., 2010), not an eclectic mysterious craft of innovation that relies on the skills and characteristics of the social entrepreneur, but instead a systematic, consistent and repeatable process.Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil)Curtis, Timothy2023-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresPeer Reviewedapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/9111510.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91115NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 4 (2022): Critical perspectives in social innovation, social enterprise and/or the social solidarity economy; 89-117NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 4 (2022): Critical perspectives in social innovation, social enterprise and/or the social solidarity economy; 89-1172562-714710.5380/nocsi.v0i4reponame:Novationinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115/49250Copyright (c) 2023 Timothy Curtishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-05-25T02:24:05Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/91115Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/oainovation@ufpr.br2562-71472562-7147opendoar:2024-07-01T12:57:13.123638Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv
Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process
title Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process
spellingShingle Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process
Curtis, Timothy
bricolage; soft systems; community policing; social innovation
title_short Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process
title_full Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process
title_fullStr Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process
title_full_unstemmed Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process
title_sort Beyond bricolage: social innovation as systematic, consistent and repeatable process
author Curtis, Timothy
author_facet Curtis, Timothy
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Curtis, Timothy
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv


dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bricolage; soft systems; community policing; social innovation
topic bricolage; soft systems; community policing; social innovation
description This paper provides empirical research demonstrating that there are clear, consistent and repeatable processes at play in social innovation, calling into question the currently hegemonic postmodernist concept of ‘social bricolage’ in social innovation literature. The paper applies a critical realist & systems analysis approach, utilising Checkland’s (1981/2000) Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). The research project investigated 8 neighbourhood and community policing projects using a handbook called Locally identified Solutions & Practices (LISP). LISP was implemented in a range of different social contexts to construct context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) chains (after Pawson, 2013) in a two-step process to identify which social innovation mechanisms contributed to what outcomes in which contexts. The paper reports on empirically based evidence of social innovation processes that do not rely on the characteristics of the individual social entrepreneur or the serendipity of social bricolage ‘freeplay’ (Derrida, 1970). The paper makes the case that social innovation is more than ‘bricolage’ (Derrida, 1970; Di Domenico et al., 2010), not an eclectic mysterious craft of innovation that relies on the skills and characteristics of the social entrepreneur, but instead a systematic, consistent and repeatable process.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
Peer Reviewed
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115
10.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91115
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91115
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91115/49250
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Timothy Curtis
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Timothy Curtis
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv





dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 4 (2022): Critical perspectives in social innovation, social enterprise and/or the social solidarity economy; 89-117
NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 4 (2022): Critical perspectives in social innovation, social enterprise and/or the social solidarity economy; 89-117
2562-7147
10.5380/nocsi.v0i4
reponame:Novation
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Novation
collection Novation
repository.name.fl_str_mv Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv novation@ufpr.br
_version_ 1808579137621721088