The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498 |
Resumo: | In this study, a comparative analysis of the motivations in appeal decisions by the Supreme Courts of Justice in Brazil and Portugal in the second half of the nineteenth century is carried out. It begins by historically contextualizing the doctrinal understanding, in the legal cultures of both countries, about the duty of motivation regarding sentences, showing that in pre-modern societies this duty was considered an accessory instrument, necessary only for the preservation of royal law. Then, the content analysis method was used to evaluate its specificities regarding the characteristics of the appeals (origin, matter, rationale) and of the recurrent parts (gender, social status). Correlations were identified between the applicants’ characteristics, the matters contested and the types of reasoning employed, and in the end it was possible to conclude that the decisions made during this period may be characterized as transitional jurisprudence, midway between the pluralistic reasoning of the old regime and the legalistic foundation typical of modernity. |
id |
UFPR-3_9af3bf4e67aba45609f13cf03d50b392 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/68498 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of JusticeA motivação das decisões sobre revista nas primeiras décadas dos Supremos Tribunais de Justiça no Brasil e em Portugal (1834–1866)Motivation of decisions. Appeal. Supreme Court of Justice. Brazil. Portugal.História do DireitoMotivação das decisões. Recurso de revista. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. Brasil. Portugal.In this study, a comparative analysis of the motivations in appeal decisions by the Supreme Courts of Justice in Brazil and Portugal in the second half of the nineteenth century is carried out. It begins by historically contextualizing the doctrinal understanding, in the legal cultures of both countries, about the duty of motivation regarding sentences, showing that in pre-modern societies this duty was considered an accessory instrument, necessary only for the preservation of royal law. Then, the content analysis method was used to evaluate its specificities regarding the characteristics of the appeals (origin, matter, rationale) and of the recurrent parts (gender, social status). Correlations were identified between the applicants’ characteristics, the matters contested and the types of reasoning employed, and in the end it was possible to conclude that the decisions made during this period may be characterized as transitional jurisprudence, midway between the pluralistic reasoning of the old regime and the legalistic foundation typical of modernity.No presente estudo realiza-se uma análise comparativa das motivações empregadas nas decisões proferidas em recursos de revista pelos Supremos Tribunais de Justiça do Brasil e de Portugal, na segunda metade do século XIX. Para isso se contextualiza historicamente o entendimento doutrinário predominante nas culturas jurídicas dos dois países acerca do dever de motivação das sentenças, verificando-se que na sociedade do antigo regime o dever de motivação era considerado instrumento acessório, necessário somente para a preservação do direito régio. Em seguida, emprega-se o método de análise de conteúdo para avaliar suas especificidades quanto às características dos recursos (origem, matéria, fundamentação) e das partes recorrentes (gênero, estatuto social). Foram identificadas correlações entre as características dos recorrentes, as matérias recorridas e os tipos de fundamentação empregados, e ao final concluiu-se que as decisões proferidas no período indicam tratar-se de uma jurisprudência de transição, a meio caminho entre a fundamentação pluralista do antigo regime e a fundamentação legalista típica da modernidade..Hespanha, António ManuelGuandalini Junior, Walter2020-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/6849810.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1.68498Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 65, n. 1 (2020); 185-2242236-72840104-331510.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498/40616Direitos autorais 2020 Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-04-28T14:09:54Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/68498Revistahttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/direitoPUBhttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs/index.php/direito/oai||revistadireito@ufpr.br2236-72840104-3315opendoar:2020-04-28T14:09:54Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice A motivação das decisões sobre revista nas primeiras décadas dos Supremos Tribunais de Justiça no Brasil e em Portugal (1834–1866) |
title |
The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice |
spellingShingle |
The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice Hespanha, António Manuel Motivation of decisions. Appeal. Supreme Court of Justice. Brazil. Portugal. História do Direito Motivação das decisões. Recurso de revista. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. Brasil. Portugal. |
title_short |
The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice |
title_full |
The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice |
title_fullStr |
The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice |
title_full_unstemmed |
The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice |
title_sort |
The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice |
author |
Hespanha, António Manuel |
author_facet |
Hespanha, António Manuel Guandalini Junior, Walter |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guandalini Junior, Walter |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hespanha, António Manuel Guandalini Junior, Walter |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Motivation of decisions. Appeal. Supreme Court of Justice. Brazil. Portugal. História do Direito Motivação das decisões. Recurso de revista. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. Brasil. Portugal. |
topic |
Motivation of decisions. Appeal. Supreme Court of Justice. Brazil. Portugal. História do Direito Motivação das decisões. Recurso de revista. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. Brasil. Portugal. |
description |
In this study, a comparative analysis of the motivations in appeal decisions by the Supreme Courts of Justice in Brazil and Portugal in the second half of the nineteenth century is carried out. It begins by historically contextualizing the doctrinal understanding, in the legal cultures of both countries, about the duty of motivation regarding sentences, showing that in pre-modern societies this duty was considered an accessory instrument, necessary only for the preservation of royal law. Then, the content analysis method was used to evaluate its specificities regarding the characteristics of the appeals (origin, matter, rationale) and of the recurrent parts (gender, social status). Correlations were identified between the applicants’ characteristics, the matters contested and the types of reasoning employed, and in the end it was possible to conclude that the decisions made during this period may be characterized as transitional jurisprudence, midway between the pluralistic reasoning of the old regime and the legalistic foundation typical of modernity. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498 10.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1.68498 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1.68498 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498/40616 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2020 Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 65, n. 1 (2020); 185-224 2236-7284 0104-3315 10.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1 reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireito@ufpr.br |
_version_ |
1799766287051653120 |