35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Svartholm, Kristina
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Educar em Revista
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/article/view/37227
Resumo: In this article, an overview of the last 35 years of bilingual education for the deaf in Sweden is presented. A short presentation is given of the terms ‘first language/mother tongue’ and ‘second/foreign language’, used in this specific context, to debate some of the main assumptions underlying first and second language teaching to deaf children. We discuss the main results from the bilingual approach, demonstrating the high level of achievements when considered in an international perspective. These results are compared to data from the first period of deaf education in Sweden, after the foundation of the Manilla school in 1809. The common basis for these examples of successful deaf education can be summarized as a positive attitude to sign language and its users. Then, we analyze some differences between natural sign languages versus simultaneous use of signs and speech, wherein the deaf addressee usually receives inconsistent linguistic information, thus making this practice less appropriate for the language learner. A discussion follows up language teaching to deaf children, including teaching a third language to them, such as English, for example. It is noted that the group of sign language users is currently undergoing a great change, especially because of the growing number of children with cochlear implants: their need for bilingualism, including sign language, is emphasized.
id UFPR-4_774f07dfa8e64742aa6b66aef08fd2f4
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/37227
network_acronym_str UFPR-4
network_name_str Educar em Revista
repository_id_str
spelling 35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?In this article, an overview of the last 35 years of bilingual education for the deaf in Sweden is presented. A short presentation is given of the terms ‘first language/mother tongue’ and ‘second/foreign language’, used in this specific context, to debate some of the main assumptions underlying first and second language teaching to deaf children. We discuss the main results from the bilingual approach, demonstrating the high level of achievements when considered in an international perspective. These results are compared to data from the first period of deaf education in Sweden, after the foundation of the Manilla school in 1809. The common basis for these examples of successful deaf education can be summarized as a positive attitude to sign language and its users. Then, we analyze some differences between natural sign languages versus simultaneous use of signs and speech, wherein the deaf addressee usually receives inconsistent linguistic information, thus making this practice less appropriate for the language learner. A discussion follows up language teaching to deaf children, including teaching a third language to them, such as English, for example. It is noted that the group of sign language users is currently undergoing a great change, especially because of the growing number of children with cochlear implants: their need for bilingualism, including sign language, is emphasized.UFPRSvartholm, Kristina2014-09-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/article/view/37227Educar em Revista; v. 30, n. especial 2 (2014); p. 33-50Educar em Revista; v. 30, n. especial 2 (2014); p. 33-50Educar em Revista; v. 30, n. especial 2 (2014); p. 33-501984-04110104-4060reponame:Educar em Revistainstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/article/view/37227/23122https://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/article/view/37227/30621info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-06-28T20:09:02Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/37227Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/educarPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/oaieducar.ufpr2016@gmail.com||educar@ufpr.br0104-40601984-0411opendoar:2017-06-28T20:09:02Educar em Revista - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv 35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?
title 35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?
spellingShingle 35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?
Svartholm, Kristina
title_short 35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?
title_full 35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?
title_fullStr 35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?
title_full_unstemmed 35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?
title_sort 35 years of Bilingual Deaf Education – and then?
author Svartholm, Kristina
author_facet Svartholm, Kristina
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Svartholm, Kristina
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv


description In this article, an overview of the last 35 years of bilingual education for the deaf in Sweden is presented. A short presentation is given of the terms ‘first language/mother tongue’ and ‘second/foreign language’, used in this specific context, to debate some of the main assumptions underlying first and second language teaching to deaf children. We discuss the main results from the bilingual approach, demonstrating the high level of achievements when considered in an international perspective. These results are compared to data from the first period of deaf education in Sweden, after the foundation of the Manilla school in 1809. The common basis for these examples of successful deaf education can be summarized as a positive attitude to sign language and its users. Then, we analyze some differences between natural sign languages versus simultaneous use of signs and speech, wherein the deaf addressee usually receives inconsistent linguistic information, thus making this practice less appropriate for the language learner. A discussion follows up language teaching to deaf children, including teaching a third language to them, such as English, for example. It is noted that the group of sign language users is currently undergoing a great change, especially because of the growing number of children with cochlear implants: their need for bilingualism, including sign language, is emphasized.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/article/view/37227
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/article/view/37227
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/article/view/37227/23122
https://revistas.ufpr.br/educar/article/view/37227/30621
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educar em Revista; v. 30, n. especial 2 (2014); p. 33-50
Educar em Revista; v. 30, n. especial 2 (2014); p. 33-50
Educar em Revista; v. 30, n. especial 2 (2014); p. 33-50
1984-0411
0104-4060
reponame:Educar em Revista
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Educar em Revista
collection Educar em Revista
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educar em Revista - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv educar.ufpr2016@gmail.com||educar@ufpr.br
_version_ 1799711902032461824