Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Em Questão (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449 |
Resumo: | Discussions about the production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data under the spectrum of the disciplinary diferences have been relevant to the scholarly communication process, mainly in the light of Open Science. The study aimed to identify production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data in Chemistry, Anthropology and Education. Methodologically, the research nature is of a descriptive nature, adopting a qualitative investigation strategy and survey method. The participants of this study were different tenured professors from the postgraduate program in Chemistry (three researchers), Anthropology (three researchers) and Education (four researchers) at the University of Brasília (UnB). The data collection proceeded through semi-structured interviews with these researchers and NVivo software (Starter Edition) assisted the data collected analysis procedures. The results obtained in the study demonstrated diferences among the three disciplinary, concerning aspects influencing the data production/achievement, stimulating or inhibiting factors of the data sharing and stimulating or inhibiting factors of the research data (re)use. Among the conclusions, it is emphasized that such disciplinary differences are fundamental requirements for the development or improvement of information systems that manage research data. |
id |
UFRGS-8_c2a72354836a58a1c6a4daec5ac0e8b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/89449 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-8 |
network_name_str |
Em Questão (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and EducationDiferenças na produção, no compartilhamento e no (re)uso de dados de pesquisa: a percepção de pesquisadores de Química, Antropologia e EducaçãoComunicação científicaCiência abertaDados de pesquisaDiferenças disciplinaresGestão de dados de pesquisaDiscussions about the production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data under the spectrum of the disciplinary diferences have been relevant to the scholarly communication process, mainly in the light of Open Science. The study aimed to identify production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data in Chemistry, Anthropology and Education. Methodologically, the research nature is of a descriptive nature, adopting a qualitative investigation strategy and survey method. The participants of this study were different tenured professors from the postgraduate program in Chemistry (three researchers), Anthropology (three researchers) and Education (four researchers) at the University of Brasília (UnB). The data collection proceeded through semi-structured interviews with these researchers and NVivo software (Starter Edition) assisted the data collected analysis procedures. The results obtained in the study demonstrated diferences among the three disciplinary, concerning aspects influencing the data production/achievement, stimulating or inhibiting factors of the data sharing and stimulating or inhibiting factors of the research data (re)use. Among the conclusions, it is emphasized that such disciplinary differences are fundamental requirements for the development or improvement of information systems that manage research data.Discussões sobre as práticas de produção/obtenção, compartilhamento e re(uso) de dados de pesquisa sob o espectro das diferenças disciplinares têm sido relevantes ao processo de comunicação científica, especialmente, à luz da Ciência Aberta. O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar as práticas de produção/obtenção, compartilhamento e (re)uso de dados de pesquisa em Química, Antropologia e Educação. No campo metodológico, é uma pesquisa de natureza descritiva, em que foi adotada a estratégia de investigação qualitativa e o método de levantamento. Os participantes do estudo foram docentes permanentes dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Química (três pesquisadores), Antropologia (três pesquisadores) e Educação (quatro pesquisadores) da Universidade de Brasília (UnB). A coleta dos dados procedeu mediante entrevistas semiestruturadas e a utilização do software NVivo (edição Starter) auxiliou os procedimentos de análise dos dados coletados. Os resultados do estudo demonstraram diferenças entre as três disciplinas, em relação aos aspectos que influenciam a produção/obtenção de dados, aos fatores que estimulariam ou inibiriam o compartilhamento de dados e aos fatores que estimulariam ou inibiriam o (re)uso de dados. Entre as conclusões, destaca-se que tais diferenças disciplinares constituem requisitos fundamentais para o desenvolvimento ou aperfeiçoamento de sistemas de informação que gerenciam dados de pesquisa. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2019-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/8944910.19132/1808-5245253.321-347Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-3471808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449/53591Copyright (c) 2019 Érika Rayanne Silva de Carvalho, Fernando César Lima Leitehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva deLeite, Fernando César Lima2024-03-20T17:34:36Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/89449Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2024-03-20T17:34:36Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education Diferenças na produção, no compartilhamento e no (re)uso de dados de pesquisa: a percepção de pesquisadores de Química, Antropologia e Educação |
title |
Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education |
spellingShingle |
Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education Carvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva de Comunicação científica Ciência aberta Dados de pesquisa Diferenças disciplinares Gestão de dados de pesquisa |
title_short |
Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education |
title_full |
Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education |
title_fullStr |
Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education |
title_sort |
Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education |
author |
Carvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva de Leite, Fernando César Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leite, Fernando César Lima |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva de Leite, Fernando César Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Comunicação científica Ciência aberta Dados de pesquisa Diferenças disciplinares Gestão de dados de pesquisa |
topic |
Comunicação científica Ciência aberta Dados de pesquisa Diferenças disciplinares Gestão de dados de pesquisa |
description |
Discussions about the production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data under the spectrum of the disciplinary diferences have been relevant to the scholarly communication process, mainly in the light of Open Science. The study aimed to identify production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data in Chemistry, Anthropology and Education. Methodologically, the research nature is of a descriptive nature, adopting a qualitative investigation strategy and survey method. The participants of this study were different tenured professors from the postgraduate program in Chemistry (three researchers), Anthropology (three researchers) and Education (four researchers) at the University of Brasília (UnB). The data collection proceeded through semi-structured interviews with these researchers and NVivo software (Starter Edition) assisted the data collected analysis procedures. The results obtained in the study demonstrated diferences among the three disciplinary, concerning aspects influencing the data production/achievement, stimulating or inhibiting factors of the data sharing and stimulating or inhibiting factors of the research data (re)use. Among the conclusions, it is emphasized that such disciplinary differences are fundamental requirements for the development or improvement of information systems that manage research data. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449 10.19132/1808-5245253.321-347 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19132/1808-5245253.321-347 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449/53591 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Érika Rayanne Silva de Carvalho, Fernando César Lima Leite https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Érika Rayanne Silva de Carvalho, Fernando César Lima Leite https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347 Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347 Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347 1808-5245 1807-8893 reponame:Em Questão (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Em Questão (Online) |
collection |
Em Questão (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799766161461608448 |