Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Leite, Fernando César Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Em Questão (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449
Resumo: Discussions about the production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data under the spectrum of the disciplinary diferences have been relevant to the scholarly communication process, mainly in the light of Open Science. The study aimed to identify production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data in Chemistry, Anthropology and Education. Methodologically, the research nature is of a descriptive nature, adopting a qualitative investigation strategy and survey method. The participants of this study were different tenured professors from the postgraduate program in Chemistry (three researchers), Anthropology (three researchers) and Education (four researchers) at the University of Brasília (UnB). The data collection proceeded through semi-structured interviews with these researchers and NVivo software (Starter Edition) assisted the data collected analysis procedures. The results obtained in the study demonstrated diferences among the three disciplinary, concerning aspects influencing the data production/achievement, stimulating or inhibiting factors of the data sharing and stimulating or inhibiting factors of the research data (re)use. Among the conclusions, it is emphasized that such disciplinary differences are fundamental requirements for the development or improvement of information systems that manage research data.
id UFRGS-8_c2a72354836a58a1c6a4daec5ac0e8b3
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/89449
network_acronym_str UFRGS-8
network_name_str Em Questão (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and EducationDiferenças na produção, no compartilhamento e no (re)uso de dados de pesquisa: a percepção de pesquisadores de Química, Antropologia e EducaçãoComunicação científicaCiência abertaDados de pesquisaDiferenças disciplinaresGestão de dados de pesquisaDiscussions about the production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data under the spectrum of the disciplinary diferences have been relevant to the scholarly communication process, mainly in the light of Open Science. The study aimed to identify production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data in Chemistry, Anthropology and Education. Methodologically, the research nature is of a descriptive nature, adopting a qualitative investigation strategy and survey method. The participants of this study were different tenured professors from the postgraduate program in Chemistry (three researchers), Anthropology (three researchers) and Education (four researchers) at the University of Brasília (UnB). The data collection proceeded through semi-structured interviews with these researchers and NVivo software (Starter Edition) assisted the data collected analysis procedures. The results obtained in the study demonstrated diferences among the three disciplinary, concerning aspects influencing the data production/achievement, stimulating or inhibiting factors of the data sharing and stimulating or inhibiting factors of the research data (re)use. Among the conclusions, it is emphasized that such disciplinary differences are fundamental requirements for the development or improvement of information systems that manage research data.Discussões sobre as práticas de produção/obtenção, compartilhamento e re(uso) de dados de pesquisa sob o espectro das diferenças disciplinares têm sido relevantes ao processo de comunicação científica, especialmente, à luz da Ciência Aberta. O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar as práticas de produção/obtenção, compartilhamento e (re)uso de dados de pesquisa em Química, Antropologia e Educação. No campo metodológico, é uma pesquisa de natureza descritiva, em que foi adotada a estratégia de investigação qualitativa e o método de levantamento. Os participantes do estudo foram docentes permanentes dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Química (três pesquisadores), Antropologia (três pesquisadores) e Educação (quatro pesquisadores) da Universidade de Brasília (UnB). A coleta dos dados procedeu mediante entrevistas semiestruturadas e a utilização do software NVivo (edição Starter) auxiliou os procedimentos de análise dos dados coletados. Os resultados do estudo demonstraram diferenças entre as três disciplinas, em relação aos aspectos que influenciam a produção/obtenção de dados, aos fatores que estimulariam ou inibiriam o compartilhamento de dados e aos fatores que estimulariam ou inibiriam o (re)uso de dados. Entre as conclusões, destaca-se que tais diferenças disciplinares constituem requisitos fundamentais para o desenvolvimento ou aperfeiçoamento de sistemas de informação que gerenciam dados de pesquisa. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2019-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/8944910.19132/1808-5245253.321-347Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-3471808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449/53591Copyright (c) 2019 Érika Rayanne Silva de Carvalho, Fernando César Lima Leitehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva deLeite, Fernando César Lima2024-03-20T17:34:36Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/89449Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2024-03-20T17:34:36Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education
Diferenças na produção, no compartilhamento e no (re)uso de dados de pesquisa: a percepção de pesquisadores de Química, Antropologia e Educação
title Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education
spellingShingle Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education
Carvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva de
Comunicação científica
Ciência aberta
Dados de pesquisa
Diferenças disciplinares
Gestão de dados de pesquisa
title_short Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education
title_full Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education
title_fullStr Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education
title_full_unstemmed Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education
title_sort Differences in production, sharing and (re)using research data, from researchers’ perspective of Chemistry, Anthropology, and Education
author Carvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva de
author_facet Carvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva de
Leite, Fernando César Lima
author_role author
author2 Leite, Fernando César Lima
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Érika Rayanne Silva de
Leite, Fernando César Lima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Comunicação científica
Ciência aberta
Dados de pesquisa
Diferenças disciplinares
Gestão de dados de pesquisa
topic Comunicação científica
Ciência aberta
Dados de pesquisa
Diferenças disciplinares
Gestão de dados de pesquisa
description Discussions about the production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data under the spectrum of the disciplinary diferences have been relevant to the scholarly communication process, mainly in the light of Open Science. The study aimed to identify production/achievement practices, sharing and (re)using research data in Chemistry, Anthropology and Education. Methodologically, the research nature is of a descriptive nature, adopting a qualitative investigation strategy and survey method. The participants of this study were different tenured professors from the postgraduate program in Chemistry (three researchers), Anthropology (three researchers) and Education (four researchers) at the University of Brasília (UnB). The data collection proceeded through semi-structured interviews with these researchers and NVivo software (Starter Edition) assisted the data collected analysis procedures. The results obtained in the study demonstrated diferences among the three disciplinary, concerning aspects influencing the data production/achievement, stimulating or inhibiting factors of the data sharing and stimulating or inhibiting factors of the research data (re)use. Among the conclusions, it is emphasized that such disciplinary differences are fundamental requirements for the development or improvement of information systems that manage research data.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449
10.19132/1808-5245253.321-347
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1808-5245253.321-347
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/89449/53591
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Érika Rayanne Silva de Carvalho, Fernando César Lima Leite
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Érika Rayanne Silva de Carvalho, Fernando César Lima Leite
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347
Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347
Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 321-347
1808-5245
1807-8893
reponame:Em Questão (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Em Questão (Online)
collection Em Questão (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766161461608448