O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carneiro, Flávio Henrique Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRN
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/13936
Resumo: The paper investigates the legal mechanisms used by the Legislature and the Executive to implement the constitutional principle of the teacher s minimum wage, which is proclaimed in the Constitution as a strategy of professional appreciation for this category. The text demonstrates that the legal mechanisms used to value the teacher were: the 1988 Constitution, the constitutional amendments to this Charter updated and modified the original text in relation to the matter, and finally, the Minimum Wage Law . Article nº 206 of 1988 s Federal Constitution established that basic education teachers, who work in public schools, would be entitled to a national minimum wage. Law nº 11.738/2008 ( Minimum Wage Law ) regulated the matter and made other determinations on the relationship between the State and the teachers such as the establishment of parameters for the distribution of the workload of teachers. Based on this law, since 2009 the minimum wage has been set annually by the Federal Government. However, state governments and municipalities throughout Brazil protested prescriptions contained in the Minimum Wage Law . In this context, some governors and mayors led the Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of this law. The complainants considered that there was unconstitutional by the following: definition of the teacher s workday, which in the complainants point of view was competence of local governments; ensuring that teachers receive salaries tied to the minimum wage with retroactive effect; transformation of the minimum wage in basic salary, lack of sufficient budget in the states and municipalities to honor with the new values to be paid to teachers and, finally, determining workload for the teacher to perform other activities besides classroom activities. At the trial held at the STF the majority of Ministers rejected the claim and considered that the Minimum Wage Law , taken together, was constitutional. However, this decision did not alter the position of the managers or the interpretation of the ministers who agreed with the unconstitutionality of some aspects of the law. This means that one law can present differences in interpretation between ordinary people and among members of the Judiciary. The search showed the following conclusions: the law is not a definitive parameter of justice, because it is deeply linked to various interests; the development, implementation, and judgment of laws dealing with minimum wage of teaching are linked to historical and cultural aspects of society; the demand for enhancement of teacher and setting a minimum wage has only emerged in the late twentieth century, a fact explained in this work based on data that indicate the recent concern of Brazilian State with schooling a phenomenon typically Republican and with the professionalization of teaching emerging concern from the knowledge society; the Legislative and Executive search mechanism to implement the minimum wage of the teachers because of the contemporary need for professionalization of teaching
id UFRN_0319f40c465ac2a18e9188a17b8612ea
oai_identifier_str oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/13936
network_acronym_str UFRN
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
repository_id_str
spelling Carneiro, Flávio Henrique Rodrigueshttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4730368A4http://lattes.cnpq.br/3456431841933671Saraiva, Paulo Lopohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6450878641547863Silveira Neto, Otacílio dos Santoshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/00283502914350712014-12-17T14:27:19Z2012-12-192014-12-17T14:27:19Z2012-09-28CARNEIRO, Flávio Henrique Rodrigues. O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988. 2012. 230 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Constituição e Garantias de Direitos) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2012.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/13936The paper investigates the legal mechanisms used by the Legislature and the Executive to implement the constitutional principle of the teacher s minimum wage, which is proclaimed in the Constitution as a strategy of professional appreciation for this category. The text demonstrates that the legal mechanisms used to value the teacher were: the 1988 Constitution, the constitutional amendments to this Charter updated and modified the original text in relation to the matter, and finally, the Minimum Wage Law . Article nº 206 of 1988 s Federal Constitution established that basic education teachers, who work in public schools, would be entitled to a national minimum wage. Law nº 11.738/2008 ( Minimum Wage Law ) regulated the matter and made other determinations on the relationship between the State and the teachers such as the establishment of parameters for the distribution of the workload of teachers. Based on this law, since 2009 the minimum wage has been set annually by the Federal Government. However, state governments and municipalities throughout Brazil protested prescriptions contained in the Minimum Wage Law . In this context, some governors and mayors led the Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of this law. The complainants considered that there was unconstitutional by the following: definition of the teacher s workday, which in the complainants point of view was competence of local governments; ensuring that teachers receive salaries tied to the minimum wage with retroactive effect; transformation of the minimum wage in basic salary, lack of sufficient budget in the states and municipalities to honor with the new values to be paid to teachers and, finally, determining workload for the teacher to perform other activities besides classroom activities. At the trial held at the STF the majority of Ministers rejected the claim and considered that the Minimum Wage Law , taken together, was constitutional. However, this decision did not alter the position of the managers or the interpretation of the ministers who agreed with the unconstitutionality of some aspects of the law. This means that one law can present differences in interpretation between ordinary people and among members of the Judiciary. The search showed the following conclusions: the law is not a definitive parameter of justice, because it is deeply linked to various interests; the development, implementation, and judgment of laws dealing with minimum wage of teaching are linked to historical and cultural aspects of society; the demand for enhancement of teacher and setting a minimum wage has only emerged in the late twentieth century, a fact explained in this work based on data that indicate the recent concern of Brazilian State with schooling a phenomenon typically Republican and with the professionalization of teaching emerging concern from the knowledge society; the Legislative and Executive search mechanism to implement the minimum wage of the teachers because of the contemporary need for professionalization of teachingO trabalho investiga os mecanismos jurídicos usados pelo Legislativo e pelo Executivo para concretizar o princípio constitucional do piso salarial do professor, princípio esse proclamado na Constituição como uma estratégia de valorização profissional dessa categoria. O texto demonstra que os mecanismos jurídicos usados para a valorização do professor foram os seguintes: a Constituição de 1988; as emendas constitucionais que atualizaram essa Carta e modificaram o texto original no tocante à matéria; e, finalmente, a Lei do Piso . O Artigo nº 206 da Constituição Federal de 1988 estabeleceu que os professores do ensino básico, que atuam em escolas da rede pública, teriam direito a um piso salarial nacional. A Lei nº 11.738/2008 ( Lei do Piso ) regulamentou a matéria e apresentou outras determinações sobre a relação que o Estado deveria manter com o magistério como, por exemplo, a criação de parâmetros para a distribuição da carga horária de trabalho do docente. Com base nessa Lei, desde 2009 o piso vem sendo definido anualmente pelo Governo Federal. Todavia, governos estaduais e prefeituras municipais de todo o Brasil protestaram contra prescrições contidas na Lei do Piso . Nesse clima de protesto, alguns governadores e prefeitos provocaram a Suprema Corte acerca da constitucionalidade dessa Lei. Os reclamantes consideravam que a inconstitucionalidade existia em razão dos seguintes aspectos: definição da jornada de trabalho do professor, que na visão dos reclamantes era atribuição dos estados e prefeituras; garantia de que os professores receberiam salários vinculados ao piso com efeito retroativo; transformação do piso salarial em vencimento básico; ausência de orçamento suficiente nos estados e municípios para honrar com os novos valores a serem pagos aos professores; finalmente, determinação de carga horária para o professor realizar outras atividades além de ministrar aulas. No julgamento realizado no STF a maioria dos Ministros julgou improcedente o pleito dos gestores públicos reclamantes e considerou que a Lei do Piso no seu conjunto era constitucional. Entretanto, essa decisão não alterou a posição dos gestores nem a interpretação dos ministros que concordaram com a inconstitucionalidade de alguns aspectos da lei. Isso significa que uma mesma lei pode apresentar divergências interpretativas entre pessoas comuns e entre membros do próprio Poder Judiciário. A pesquisa apontou as seguintes conclusões: a lei não é parâmetro definitivo de justiça, pois ela está profundamente vinculada a interesses diversos; a elaboração, a implantação e o julgamento das leis que tratam do piso salarial do magistério se vinculam aos aspectos históricos e culturais da sociedade; a demanda por valorização do professor e fixação de um piso salarial só surgiu no final do século XX, fato explicitado no trabalho a partir de dados que indicam a recente preocupação do estado brasileiro com a educação escolar fenômeno tipicamente republicano e com a profissionalização do professor preocupação emergente a partir da sociedade do conhecimento; os poderes Legislativo e Executivo procuram mecanismos para implantar o piso salarial do professor em razão da necessidade contemporânea de profissionalização do magistério.application/pdfporUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NortePrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoUFRNBRConstituição e Garantias de DireitosDireito Constitucional e educaçãopiso salárial do magistériovalorização do professorconstitutional law and educationminimum wage of teachingappreciation of the teacherCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOO piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNTEXTFlavioHRC_DISSERT.pdf.txtFlavioHRC_DISSERT.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain553544https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/6/FlavioHRC_DISSERT.pdf.txt0df1f59f54ac1db31fc5975c5bb3ebbbMD56PisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf.txtPisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain553267https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/8/PisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf.txt84f9c74c83d86d454fc510a068c58b60MD58THUMBNAILFlavioHRC_DISSERT.pdf.jpgFlavioHRC_DISSERT.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg1886https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/7/FlavioHRC_DISSERT.pdf.jpga6dd53e5c25a737a7281793970a21d92MD57PisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf.jpgPisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1239https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/9/PisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf.jpgb7b50651b7067aefccdb711c537df304MD59ORIGINALPisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdfapplication/pdf1732376https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/1/PisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf8c792fe0f38262c190c5973d6c22abddMD51123456789/139362019-05-26 02:12:23.068oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/13936Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/opendoar:2019-05-26T05:12:23Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988
title O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988
spellingShingle O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988
Carneiro, Flávio Henrique Rodrigues
Direito Constitucional e educação
piso salárial do magistério
valorização do professor
constitutional law and education
minimum wage of teaching
appreciation of the teacher
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988
title_full O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988
title_fullStr O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988
title_full_unstemmed O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988
title_sort O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988
author Carneiro, Flávio Henrique Rodrigues
author_facet Carneiro, Flávio Henrique Rodrigues
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorID.por.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.authorLattes.por.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4730368A4
dc.contributor.advisorID.por.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.advisorLattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3456431841933671
dc.contributor.referees1.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Saraiva, Paulo Lopo
dc.contributor.referees1ID.por.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.referees1Lattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6450878641547863
dc.contributor.referees2.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Silveira Neto, Otacílio dos Santos
dc.contributor.referees2ID.por.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.referees2Lattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0028350291435071
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carneiro, Flávio Henrique Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito Constitucional e educação
piso salárial do magistério
valorização do professor
topic Direito Constitucional e educação
piso salárial do magistério
valorização do professor
constitutional law and education
minimum wage of teaching
appreciation of the teacher
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv constitutional law and education
minimum wage of teaching
appreciation of the teacher
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description The paper investigates the legal mechanisms used by the Legislature and the Executive to implement the constitutional principle of the teacher s minimum wage, which is proclaimed in the Constitution as a strategy of professional appreciation for this category. The text demonstrates that the legal mechanisms used to value the teacher were: the 1988 Constitution, the constitutional amendments to this Charter updated and modified the original text in relation to the matter, and finally, the Minimum Wage Law . Article nº 206 of 1988 s Federal Constitution established that basic education teachers, who work in public schools, would be entitled to a national minimum wage. Law nº 11.738/2008 ( Minimum Wage Law ) regulated the matter and made other determinations on the relationship between the State and the teachers such as the establishment of parameters for the distribution of the workload of teachers. Based on this law, since 2009 the minimum wage has been set annually by the Federal Government. However, state governments and municipalities throughout Brazil protested prescriptions contained in the Minimum Wage Law . In this context, some governors and mayors led the Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of this law. The complainants considered that there was unconstitutional by the following: definition of the teacher s workday, which in the complainants point of view was competence of local governments; ensuring that teachers receive salaries tied to the minimum wage with retroactive effect; transformation of the minimum wage in basic salary, lack of sufficient budget in the states and municipalities to honor with the new values to be paid to teachers and, finally, determining workload for the teacher to perform other activities besides classroom activities. At the trial held at the STF the majority of Ministers rejected the claim and considered that the Minimum Wage Law , taken together, was constitutional. However, this decision did not alter the position of the managers or the interpretation of the ministers who agreed with the unconstitutionality of some aspects of the law. This means that one law can present differences in interpretation between ordinary people and among members of the Judiciary. The search showed the following conclusions: the law is not a definitive parameter of justice, because it is deeply linked to various interests; the development, implementation, and judgment of laws dealing with minimum wage of teaching are linked to historical and cultural aspects of society; the demand for enhancement of teacher and setting a minimum wage has only emerged in the late twentieth century, a fact explained in this work based on data that indicate the recent concern of Brazilian State with schooling a phenomenon typically Republican and with the professionalization of teaching emerging concern from the knowledge society; the Legislative and Executive search mechanism to implement the minimum wage of the teachers because of the contemporary need for professionalization of teaching
publishDate 2012
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2012-12-19
2014-12-17T14:27:19Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-09-28
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-12-17T14:27:19Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv CARNEIRO, Flávio Henrique Rodrigues. O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988. 2012. 230 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Constituição e Garantias de Direitos) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/13936
identifier_str_mv CARNEIRO, Flávio Henrique Rodrigues. O piso salarial nacional: a valorização do professor na Constituição de 1988. 2012. 230 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Constituição e Garantias de Direitos) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2012.
url https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/13936
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRN
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Constituição e Garantias de Direitos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRN
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/6/FlavioHRC_DISSERT.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/8/PisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/7/FlavioHRC_DISSERT.pdf.jpg
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/9/PisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf.jpg
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/13936/1/PisoSalarialNacional_Carneiro_2012.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 0df1f59f54ac1db31fc5975c5bb3ebbb
84f9c74c83d86d454fc510a068c58b60
a6dd53e5c25a737a7281793970a21d92
b7b50651b7067aefccdb711c537df304
8c792fe0f38262c190c5973d6c22abdd
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802117880282611712