Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Ciências da Administração |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81 |
Resumo: | This study seeks to highlight the importance of adopting certain methodological components to make an intellectual production truly scientific. Therefore, it briefly discusses the main “schools” of methodology – namely, inductive, deductive, hypothetical-deductive and dialectical – to then seek the thesis of one Graduate Program in Administration for statements – by the authors – about the adoption of one of these methods as paradigm for conducting the academic exhibition held. The research does not review the adequacy of the methodological choices nor the correct application of the methodos, but only the statement of methodological option or choice itself. It is a descriptive research, as to the purposes, and classified as to the means, as a case study. Analyzed all essays submitted between the years 2010 and 2014 it was possible to perceive the low adherence rate of the theses to specifically one of the scientific methods. In other words, the authors did not make explicit throughout their work if they defined (and thus followed) any methodological paths whatsoever. |
id |
UFSC-15_92e386ed129e7ac05abe5c6c1a9e6451 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/42719 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-15 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Ciências da Administração |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014Adoção de Métodos Científicos como Componente Metodológica e sua explicação nas Dissertações Publicizadas entre 2010 e 2014 de um Programa de Pós-Graduação em AdministraçãoThis study seeks to highlight the importance of adopting certain methodological components to make an intellectual production truly scientific. Therefore, it briefly discusses the main “schools” of methodology – namely, inductive, deductive, hypothetical-deductive and dialectical – to then seek the thesis of one Graduate Program in Administration for statements – by the authors – about the adoption of one of these methods as paradigm for conducting the academic exhibition held. The research does not review the adequacy of the methodological choices nor the correct application of the methodos, but only the statement of methodological option or choice itself. It is a descriptive research, as to the purposes, and classified as to the means, as a case study. Analyzed all essays submitted between the years 2010 and 2014 it was possible to perceive the low adherence rate of the theses to specifically one of the scientific methods. In other words, the authors did not make explicit throughout their work if they defined (and thus followed) any methodological paths whatsoever.O presente estudo procura ressaltar a importância da adoção de determinadas componentes metodológicas para que uma produção intelectual possa se pretender verdadeiramente científica. Assim sendo, discorre sobre as principais “escolas” de metodologia – a saber, indutiva, dedutiva, hipotético-dedutiva e dialética – para, em seguida, buscar nas dissertações de mestrado de um Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração menções – por parte dos autores – da adoção de um dos referidos métodos como paradigma para a condução da exposição acadêmica que realizaram. O estudo não analisa a adequação da escolha metodológica nem a correta aplicação dos pressupostos de cada método, mas sim, a ostensividade das escolhas feitas ou não. Trata-se de pesquisa de natureza descritiva, quanto aos fins, e classificada, quanto aos meios, como um estudo de caso. Analisadas todas as dissertações apresentadas entre os anos de 2010 e 2014 percebeu-se baixa taxa de aderência a uma das metodologias por parte dos autores que, se realizaram opções metodológicas não o explicitaram ao longo de seus textos. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2016-04-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionEstudo de caso; Estudo descritivo; Pesquisa quali-quantitativa; Método dedutivoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p8110.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 81-902175-80771516-3865reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrinide Olivo, Luis Carlos Cancellier2017-07-12T11:39:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/42719Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/admPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/oairevista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br2175-80771516-3865opendoar:2017-07-12T11:39:42Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014 Adoção de Métodos Científicos como Componente Metodológica e sua explicação nas Dissertações Publicizadas entre 2010 e 2014 de um Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração |
title |
Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014 |
spellingShingle |
Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014 Ribas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrini |
title_short |
Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014 |
title_full |
Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014 |
title_fullStr |
Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014 |
title_sort |
Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014 |
author |
Ribas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrini |
author_facet |
Ribas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrini de Olivo, Luis Carlos Cancellier |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Olivo, Luis Carlos Cancellier |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrini de Olivo, Luis Carlos Cancellier |
description |
This study seeks to highlight the importance of adopting certain methodological components to make an intellectual production truly scientific. Therefore, it briefly discusses the main “schools” of methodology – namely, inductive, deductive, hypothetical-deductive and dialectical – to then seek the thesis of one Graduate Program in Administration for statements – by the authors – about the adoption of one of these methods as paradigm for conducting the academic exhibition held. The research does not review the adequacy of the methodological choices nor the correct application of the methodos, but only the statement of methodological option or choice itself. It is a descriptive research, as to the purposes, and classified as to the means, as a case study. Analyzed all essays submitted between the years 2010 and 2014 it was possible to perceive the low adherence rate of the theses to specifically one of the scientific methods. In other words, the authors did not make explicit throughout their work if they defined (and thus followed) any methodological paths whatsoever. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Estudo de caso; Estudo descritivo; Pesquisa quali-quantitativa; Método dedutivo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81 10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 81-90 2175-8077 1516-3865 reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administração instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista de Ciências da Administração |
collection |
Revista de Ciências da Administração |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435142548226048 |