Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrini
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: de Olivo, Luis Carlos Cancellier
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências da Administração
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81
Resumo: This study seeks to highlight the importance of adopting certain methodological components to make an intellectual production truly scientific. Therefore, it briefly discusses the main “schools” of methodology – namely, inductive, deductive, hypothetical-deductive and dialectical – to then seek the thesis of one Graduate Program in Administration for statements – by the authors – about the adoption of one of these methods as paradigm for conducting the academic exhibition held. The research does not review the adequacy of the methodological choices nor the correct application of the methodos, but only the statement of methodological option or choice itself. It is a descriptive research, as to the purposes, and classified as to the means, as a case study. Analyzed all essays submitted between the years 2010 and 2014 it was possible to perceive the low adherence rate of the theses to specifically one of the scientific methods. In other words, the authors did not make explicit throughout their work if they defined (and thus followed) any methodological paths whatsoever.
id UFSC-15_92e386ed129e7ac05abe5c6c1a9e6451
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/42719
network_acronym_str UFSC-15
network_name_str Revista de Ciências da Administração
repository_id_str
spelling Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014Adoção de Métodos Científicos como Componente Metodológica e sua explicação nas Dissertações Publicizadas entre 2010 e 2014 de um Programa de Pós-Graduação em AdministraçãoThis study seeks to highlight the importance of adopting certain methodological components to make an intellectual production truly scientific. Therefore, it briefly discusses the main “schools” of methodology – namely, inductive, deductive, hypothetical-deductive and dialectical – to then seek the thesis of one Graduate Program in Administration for statements – by the authors – about the adoption of one of these methods as paradigm for conducting the academic exhibition held. The research does not review the adequacy of the methodological choices nor the correct application of the methodos, but only the statement of methodological option or choice itself. It is a descriptive research, as to the purposes, and classified as to the means, as a case study. Analyzed all essays submitted between the years 2010 and 2014 it was possible to perceive the low adherence rate of the theses to specifically one of the scientific methods. In other words, the authors did not make explicit throughout their work if they defined (and thus followed) any methodological paths whatsoever.O presente estudo procura ressaltar a importância da adoção de determinadas componentes metodológicas para que uma produção intelectual possa se pretender verdadeiramente científica. Assim sendo, discorre sobre as principais “escolas” de metodologia – a saber, indutiva, dedutiva, hipotético-dedutiva e dialética – para, em seguida, buscar nas dissertações de mestrado de um Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração menções – por parte dos autores – da adoção de um dos referidos métodos como paradigma para a condução da exposição acadêmica que realizaram. O estudo não analisa a adequação da escolha metodológica nem a correta aplicação dos pressupostos de cada método, mas sim, a ostensividade das escolhas feitas ou não. Trata-se de pesquisa de natureza descritiva, quanto aos fins, e classificada, quanto aos meios, como um estudo de caso.  Analisadas todas as dissertações apresentadas entre os anos de 2010 e 2014 percebeu-se baixa taxa de aderência a uma das metodologias por parte dos autores que, se realizaram opções metodológicas não o explicitaram ao longo de seus textos. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2016-04-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionEstudo de caso; Estudo descritivo; Pesquisa quali-quantitativa; Método dedutivoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p8110.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 81-902175-80771516-3865reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrinide Olivo, Luis Carlos Cancellier2017-07-12T11:39:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/42719Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/admPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/oairevista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br2175-80771516-3865opendoar:2017-07-12T11:39:42Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014
Adoção de Métodos Científicos como Componente Metodológica e sua explicação nas Dissertações Publicizadas entre 2010 e 2014 de um Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração
title Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014
spellingShingle Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014
Ribas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrini
title_short Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014
title_full Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014
title_fullStr Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014
title_full_unstemmed Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014
title_sort Adoption of Scientific Methods as a Methodological Component and its Explicitation in the Dissertations of a Graduate Program in Administration Between 2010 and 2014
author Ribas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrini
author_facet Ribas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrini
de Olivo, Luis Carlos Cancellier
author_role author
author2 de Olivo, Luis Carlos Cancellier
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribas, Ruy Tadeu Mambrini
de Olivo, Luis Carlos Cancellier
description This study seeks to highlight the importance of adopting certain methodological components to make an intellectual production truly scientific. Therefore, it briefly discusses the main “schools” of methodology – namely, inductive, deductive, hypothetical-deductive and dialectical – to then seek the thesis of one Graduate Program in Administration for statements – by the authors – about the adoption of one of these methods as paradigm for conducting the academic exhibition held. The research does not review the adequacy of the methodological choices nor the correct application of the methodos, but only the statement of methodological option or choice itself. It is a descriptive research, as to the purposes, and classified as to the means, as a case study. Analyzed all essays submitted between the years 2010 and 2014 it was possible to perceive the low adherence rate of the theses to specifically one of the scientific methods. In other words, the authors did not make explicit throughout their work if they defined (and thus followed) any methodological paths whatsoever.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Estudo de caso; Estudo descritivo; Pesquisa quali-quantitativa; Método dedutivo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81
10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p81/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 81-90
2175-8077
1516-3865
reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administração
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista de Ciências da Administração
collection Revista de Ciências da Administração
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435142548226048