Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707 |
Resumo: | Physical exercise is an important option to maintain functional independence in older adults, however, it is not clear which type of exercise is the most benefic: strength or multicomponent. The objective was to verify the effectiveness of strength training and multicomponent training on functionality of healthy older patients through a systematic review with meta-analysis. Registration number: CRD42017071887. Two independent evaluators searched Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane and Lilacs databases. Of the 1,434 studies found, 32 clinical trials that investigated the effects of strength training only and/or combined with other modalities (multicomponent) in older adults and evaluated the Timed up and Go (TUG), sit-to-stand (STS) and/or Berg Balance Scale (BBS were included. The methodological quality was evaluated with the Downs & Black scale. Data analysis was performed with the Software Review Manager. It was verified improvement in all the investigated outcomes when performing multicomponent training in comparison to control groups. Strength training, compared to control groups, showed benefit only for sit to stand test. Studies comparing the two trainings found no difference between them. The not high average score in the methodological quality assessment of the included studies is a limitation of the present study. In conclusion, both types of training were effective to improve functionality and are good strategies of training for older individuals. However, as the comparison between the two types of training was performed in few studies, it is not possible to infer which is more effective for the functionality, suggesting the realization of new clinical trials. |
id |
UFSC-16_6a2a1336120dffd5b5ac311204d03985 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/60707 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysisInfluência do treinamento de força e de multicomponentes na funcionalidade de idosos: revisão sistemática e metanálisePhysical exercise is an important option to maintain functional independence in older adults, however, it is not clear which type of exercise is the most benefic: strength or multicomponent. The objective was to verify the effectiveness of strength training and multicomponent training on functionality of healthy older patients through a systematic review with meta-analysis. Registration number: CRD42017071887. Two independent evaluators searched Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane and Lilacs databases. Of the 1,434 studies found, 32 clinical trials that investigated the effects of strength training only and/or combined with other modalities (multicomponent) in older adults and evaluated the Timed up and Go (TUG), sit-to-stand (STS) and/or Berg Balance Scale (BBS were included. The methodological quality was evaluated with the Downs & Black scale. Data analysis was performed with the Software Review Manager. It was verified improvement in all the investigated outcomes when performing multicomponent training in comparison to control groups. Strength training, compared to control groups, showed benefit only for sit to stand test. Studies comparing the two trainings found no difference between them. The not high average score in the methodological quality assessment of the included studies is a limitation of the present study. In conclusion, both types of training were effective to improve functionality and are good strategies of training for older individuals. However, as the comparison between the two types of training was performed in few studies, it is not possible to infer which is more effective for the functionality, suggesting the realization of new clinical trials.O exercício físico é uma opção importante para a manutenção da independência funcional nos idosos, porém, não está claro qual tipo de exercício pode ser mais benéfico. Diante disso, buscou-se verificar o efeito de intervenções com treinamento de força e do treino com multicomponentes na funcionalidade em idosos saudáveis, através de uma revisão sistemática com metanálise. Número de registro: CRD42017071887. Foram realizadas buscas nas bases de dados Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane e Lilacs. Dos 1434 estudos encontrados, 32 ensaios clínicos que realizaram treino de força e/ou combinado com outras modalidades (multicomponentes) em idosos e avaliaram os desfechos Timed up and Go (TUG), sentar-e-levantar (STS) e/ou Escala de Equilíbrio de Berg (EEB) foram incluídos. A qualidade metodológica foi avaliada pela escala Downs & Black. A análise dos dados foi realizada no Software Rewiew Manager. Verificou-se que os resultados favoreceram o treino multicomponentes em comparação aos grupos controle nos desfechos TUG, STS e EEB. Já para o treino de força isso ocorreu somente para o STS. Quando os dois treinamentos foram comparados, não houve favorecimento para nenhum deles. O escore médio não alto na avaliação da qualidade metodológica dos estudos incluídos é uma limitação do presente estudo. Conclui-se que ambos os treinos se mostraram efetivos para a funcionalidade e são boas estratégias de treinamento para idosos. Porém, como a comparação entre os dois tipos de treinamento foi realizada em poucos estudos, não é possível afirmar qual é mais efetivo para a funcionalidade, sugerindo-se a realização de novos ensaios clínicos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2020-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado""Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"Artigo de revisãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e6070710.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e60707Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 22 (2020); e60707Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 22 (2020); e607071980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707/42679Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMeereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline WelterGuadagnin, Eliane CelinaMota, Carlos Bolli2020-07-15T15:23:50Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/60707Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2020-07-15T15:23:50Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis Influência do treinamento de força e de multicomponentes na funcionalidade de idosos: revisão sistemática e metanálise |
title |
Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis Meereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline Welter |
title_short |
Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Meereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline Welter |
author_facet |
Meereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline Welter Guadagnin, Eliane Celina Mota, Carlos Bolli |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guadagnin, Eliane Celina Mota, Carlos Bolli |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Meereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline Welter Guadagnin, Eliane Celina Mota, Carlos Bolli |
description |
Physical exercise is an important option to maintain functional independence in older adults, however, it is not clear which type of exercise is the most benefic: strength or multicomponent. The objective was to verify the effectiveness of strength training and multicomponent training on functionality of healthy older patients through a systematic review with meta-analysis. Registration number: CRD42017071887. Two independent evaluators searched Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane and Lilacs databases. Of the 1,434 studies found, 32 clinical trials that investigated the effects of strength training only and/or combined with other modalities (multicomponent) in older adults and evaluated the Timed up and Go (TUG), sit-to-stand (STS) and/or Berg Balance Scale (BBS were included. The methodological quality was evaluated with the Downs & Black scale. Data analysis was performed with the Software Review Manager. It was verified improvement in all the investigated outcomes when performing multicomponent training in comparison to control groups. Strength training, compared to control groups, showed benefit only for sit to stand test. Studies comparing the two trainings found no difference between them. The not high average score in the methodological quality assessment of the included studies is a limitation of the present study. In conclusion, both types of training were effective to improve functionality and are good strategies of training for older individuals. However, as the comparison between the two types of training was performed in few studies, it is not possible to infer which is more effective for the functionality, suggesting the realization of new clinical trials. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado" "Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado" Artigo de revisão info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707 10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e60707 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e60707 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707/42679 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 22 (2020); e60707 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 22 (2020); e60707 1980-0037 1415-8426 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435125696561152 |