Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline Welter
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Guadagnin, Eliane Celina, Mota, Carlos Bolli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707
Resumo: Physical exercise is an important option to maintain functional independence in older adults, however, it is not clear which type of exercise is the most benefic: strength or multicomponent. The objective was to verify the effectiveness of strength training and multicomponent training on functionality of healthy older patients through a systematic review with meta-analysis. Registration number: CRD42017071887. Two independent evaluators searched Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane and Lilacs databases. Of the 1,434 studies found, 32 clinical trials that investigated the effects of strength training only and/or combined with other modalities (multicomponent) in older adults and evaluated the Timed up and Go (TUG), sit-to-stand (STS) and/or Berg Balance Scale (BBS were included. The methodological quality was evaluated with the Downs & Black scale. Data analysis was performed with the Software Review Manager. It was verified improvement in all the investigated outcomes when performing multicomponent training in comparison to control groups. Strength training, compared to control groups, showed benefit only for sit to stand test. Studies comparing the two trainings found no difference between them. The not high average score in the methodological quality assessment of the included studies is a limitation of the present study. In conclusion, both types of training were effective to improve functionality and are good strategies of training for older individuals. However, as the comparison between the two types of training was performed in few studies, it is not possible to infer which is more effective for the functionality, suggesting the realization of new clinical trials.
id UFSC-16_6a2a1336120dffd5b5ac311204d03985
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/60707
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysisInfluência do treinamento de força e de multicomponentes na funcionalidade de idosos: revisão sistemática e metanálisePhysical exercise is an important option to maintain functional independence in older adults, however, it is not clear which type of exercise is the most benefic: strength or multicomponent. The objective was to verify the effectiveness of strength training and multicomponent training on functionality of healthy older patients through a systematic review with meta-analysis. Registration number: CRD42017071887. Two independent evaluators searched Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane and Lilacs databases. Of the 1,434 studies found, 32 clinical trials that investigated the effects of strength training only and/or combined with other modalities (multicomponent) in older adults and evaluated the Timed up and Go (TUG), sit-to-stand (STS) and/or Berg Balance Scale (BBS were included. The methodological quality was evaluated with the Downs & Black scale. Data analysis was performed with the Software Review Manager. It was verified improvement in all the investigated outcomes when performing multicomponent training in comparison to control groups. Strength training, compared to control groups, showed benefit only for sit to stand test. Studies comparing the two trainings found no difference between them. The not high average score in the methodological quality assessment of the included studies is a limitation of the present study. In conclusion, both types of training were effective to improve functionality and are good strategies of training for older individuals. However, as the comparison between the two types of training was performed in few studies, it is not possible to infer which is more effective for the functionality, suggesting the realization of new clinical trials.O exercício físico é uma opção importante para a manutenção da independência funcional nos idosos, porém, não está claro qual tipo de exercício pode ser mais benéfico. Diante disso, buscou-se verificar o efeito de intervenções com treinamento de força e do treino com multicomponentes na funcionalidade em idosos saudáveis, através de uma revisão sistemática com metanálise. Número de registro: CRD42017071887. Foram realizadas buscas nas bases de dados Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane e Lilacs. Dos 1434 estudos encontrados, 32 ensaios clínicos que realizaram treino de força e/ou combinado com outras modalidades (multicomponentes) em idosos e avaliaram os desfechos Timed up and Go (TUG), sentar-e-levantar (STS) e/ou Escala de Equilíbrio de Berg (EEB) foram incluídos. A qualidade metodológica foi avaliada pela escala Downs & Black. A análise dos dados foi realizada no Software Rewiew Manager. Verificou-se que os resultados favoreceram o treino multicomponentes em comparação aos grupos controle nos desfechos TUG, STS e EEB. Já para o treino de força isso ocorreu somente para o STS. Quando os dois treinamentos foram comparados, não houve favorecimento para nenhum deles. O escore médio não alto na avaliação da qualidade metodológica dos estudos incluídos é uma limitação do presente estudo. Conclui-se que ambos os treinos se mostraram efetivos para a funcionalidade e são boas estratégias de treinamento para idosos. Porém, como a comparação entre os dois tipos de treinamento foi realizada em poucos estudos, não é possível afirmar qual é mais efetivo para a funcionalidade, sugerindo-se a realização de novos ensaios clínicos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2020-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado""Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"Artigo de revisãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e6070710.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e60707Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 22 (2020); e60707Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 22 (2020); e607071980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707/42679Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMeereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline WelterGuadagnin, Eliane CelinaMota, Carlos Bolli2020-07-15T15:23:50Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/60707Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2020-07-15T15:23:50Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
Influência do treinamento de força e de multicomponentes na funcionalidade de idosos: revisão sistemática e metanálise
title Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
Meereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline Welter
title_short Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Influence of strength training and multicomponent training on the functionality of older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
author Meereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline Welter
author_facet Meereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline Welter
Guadagnin, Eliane Celina
Mota, Carlos Bolli
author_role author
author2 Guadagnin, Eliane Celina
Mota, Carlos Bolli
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meereis-Lemos, Estele Caroline Welter
Guadagnin, Eliane Celina
Mota, Carlos Bolli
description Physical exercise is an important option to maintain functional independence in older adults, however, it is not clear which type of exercise is the most benefic: strength or multicomponent. The objective was to verify the effectiveness of strength training and multicomponent training on functionality of healthy older patients through a systematic review with meta-analysis. Registration number: CRD42017071887. Two independent evaluators searched Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane and Lilacs databases. Of the 1,434 studies found, 32 clinical trials that investigated the effects of strength training only and/or combined with other modalities (multicomponent) in older adults and evaluated the Timed up and Go (TUG), sit-to-stand (STS) and/or Berg Balance Scale (BBS were included. The methodological quality was evaluated with the Downs & Black scale. Data analysis was performed with the Software Review Manager. It was verified improvement in all the investigated outcomes when performing multicomponent training in comparison to control groups. Strength training, compared to control groups, showed benefit only for sit to stand test. Studies comparing the two trainings found no difference between them. The not high average score in the methodological quality assessment of the included studies is a limitation of the present study. In conclusion, both types of training were effective to improve functionality and are good strategies of training for older individuals. However, as the comparison between the two types of training was performed in few studies, it is not possible to infer which is more effective for the functionality, suggesting the realization of new clinical trials.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares","Artigo Solicitado"
"Avaliado por Pares", "Artigo Solicitado"
Artigo de revisão
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707
10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e60707
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e60707
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2020v22e60707/42679
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 22 (2020); e60707
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 22 (2020); e60707
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435125696561152