Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2019v36n1p69 |
Resumo: | This paper investigates the presence of analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks indicated by the Guia de Livros Didáticos – PNLD 2018. Based on the most current language studies, there is an attempt to establish a conceptual distinction between these two figures of speech in order to a better use on Physics Education. The content analysis proposed by Bardin (2002) is used for data collection and registration and an adapted version of classification created by Curtis and Reigeluth (1984) is used for the classification of the occurrences. The numerical and qualitative data show the opposite characteristics between analogies and metaphors. Both compare familiar or already known information (vehicle) to new information (target), but the analogy does that with things that belong to the same domains while the metaphor does that with things that belong to different ones. Analogies is a useful tool to compare similarities and differences, which is very important to teaching concepts of Modern Physics. On the other hand, metaphors may make comparisons through concrete to abstract concepts, however this is done on a simplest form, hence, it requires more attention by authors of textbooks and teachers who use them. |
id |
UFSC-19_8a11a406d961bc1a3dd75f757d39686c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/58679 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-19 |
network_name_str |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018Analogias e metáforas no ensino de Física Moderna apresentadas nos livros didáticos aprovados pelo PNLD 2018This paper investigates the presence of analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks indicated by the Guia de Livros Didáticos – PNLD 2018. Based on the most current language studies, there is an attempt to establish a conceptual distinction between these two figures of speech in order to a better use on Physics Education. The content analysis proposed by Bardin (2002) is used for data collection and registration and an adapted version of classification created by Curtis and Reigeluth (1984) is used for the classification of the occurrences. The numerical and qualitative data show the opposite characteristics between analogies and metaphors. Both compare familiar or already known information (vehicle) to new information (target), but the analogy does that with things that belong to the same domains while the metaphor does that with things that belong to different ones. Analogies is a useful tool to compare similarities and differences, which is very important to teaching concepts of Modern Physics. On the other hand, metaphors may make comparisons through concrete to abstract concepts, however this is done on a simplest form, hence, it requires more attention by authors of textbooks and teachers who use them.Este artigo investiga a presença de analogias e metáforas em capítulos de Física Moderna nos livros didáticos indicados pelo Guia de Livros Didáticos – PNLD 2018. Com base nos estudos linguísticos mais atuais, tenta-se estabelecer uma distinção conceitual entre essas duas figuras de linguagem para que elas possam ser melhor aproveitadas no ensino de Física. Para a coleta e registro dos dados, utiliza-se a análise de conteúdos proposta por Bardin (2002), enquanto que para a classificação das ocorrências é utilizada uma versão adaptada daquela proposta por Curtis e Reigeluth (1984). Os resultados obtidos, tanto numéricos quanto qualitativos, evidenciam as características opostas entre analogias e metáforas. Ambas aproximam informações familiares ou já conhecidas (veículo) de informações novas (alvo), mas a analogia faz isso aproximando coisas que pertencem a domínios com características comuns, enquanto a metáfora o faz aproximando coisas que pertencem a domínios muito distintos. Didaticamente, as analogias permitem fazer comparações por meio de semelhanças ou diferenças, o que é fundamental para a explicação de conceitos de Física Moderna. Já as metáforas podem ajudar a aproximar conceitos concretos de abstratos, mas isso é feito, em geral, de forma mais simples, o que requer um cuidado maior por parte dos autores de livros didáticos e dos professores que os utilizam.Imprensa Universitária - UFSC2019-05-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2019v36n1p6910.5007/2175-7941.2019v36n1p69Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física; v. 36 n. 1 (2019); 69-982175-79411677-2334reponame:Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2019v36n1p69/39933Copyright (c) 2019 Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Físicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKopp, Felipe AugustoAlmeida, Voltaire de2019-07-24T18:44:44Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/58679Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/oaicbefisica@gmail.com||fscccef@fsc.ufsc.br|| cbefisica@gmail.com2175-79411677-2334opendoar:2019-07-24T18:44:44Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018 Analogias e metáforas no ensino de Física Moderna apresentadas nos livros didáticos aprovados pelo PNLD 2018 |
title |
Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018 |
spellingShingle |
Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018 Kopp, Felipe Augusto |
title_short |
Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018 |
title_full |
Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018 |
title_fullStr |
Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018 |
title_sort |
Analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks approved by the PNLD 2018 |
author |
Kopp, Felipe Augusto |
author_facet |
Kopp, Felipe Augusto Almeida, Voltaire de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Voltaire de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kopp, Felipe Augusto Almeida, Voltaire de |
description |
This paper investigates the presence of analogies and metaphors on chapters of Modern Physics in textbooks indicated by the Guia de Livros Didáticos – PNLD 2018. Based on the most current language studies, there is an attempt to establish a conceptual distinction between these two figures of speech in order to a better use on Physics Education. The content analysis proposed by Bardin (2002) is used for data collection and registration and an adapted version of classification created by Curtis and Reigeluth (1984) is used for the classification of the occurrences. The numerical and qualitative data show the opposite characteristics between analogies and metaphors. Both compare familiar or already known information (vehicle) to new information (target), but the analogy does that with things that belong to the same domains while the metaphor does that with things that belong to different ones. Analogies is a useful tool to compare similarities and differences, which is very important to teaching concepts of Modern Physics. On the other hand, metaphors may make comparisons through concrete to abstract concepts, however this is done on a simplest form, hence, it requires more attention by authors of textbooks and teachers who use them. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2019v36n1p69 10.5007/2175-7941.2019v36n1p69 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2019v36n1p69 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7941.2019v36n1p69 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/2175-7941.2019v36n1p69/39933 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Imprensa Universitária - UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Imprensa Universitária - UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física; v. 36 n. 1 (2019); 69-98 2175-7941 1677-2334 reponame:Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) |
collection |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cbefisica@gmail.com||fscccef@fsc.ufsc.br|| cbefisica@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799940574255513600 |