Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesario

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bendrath, Eduard Angelo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/93291
Resumo: The purpose of this text is to contribute to the debate on training in Physical Education, analyzing the new DCNs for the area, as well as the reissue of Law 9696/98 on the regulation of the profession, which under the new guise of Law 14.386/2022, inserts new actors and rules that modify and at the same time perpetuate the systems of control and power in the field of dispute. It can be seen that the changes in the new DCNs brought new impetus to training, however, the process of understanding the training structure was simplified, adapting the reality of the area to the panorama of the labor market. In the meantime, the enactment of Law 14.386/2022 accentuated the legalistic and punitive power of the CONFEF/CREF system, granting it broad powers in the dictates concerning professional practice, which can be understood as a restriction of the fundamental principle of the natural freedom of individuals.
id UFSC-2_b5c950ca3bbb137d4ea45a5810714dc5
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/93291
network_acronym_str UFSC-2
network_name_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository_id_str
spelling Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesarioFormación profesional en Educación Física en Brasil: un debate necesarioFormação profissional em Educação Física no Brasil: um debate necessário: un debate necesarioRegulationPolicyPhysical educationProfessional qualificationFormación profesionalRegulaciónPolíticaEducación físicaRegulamentaçãoPolíticaEducação físicaFormação profissionalThe purpose of this text is to contribute to the debate on training in Physical Education, analyzing the new DCNs for the area, as well as the reissue of Law 9696/98 on the regulation of the profession, which under the new guise of Law 14.386/2022, inserts new actors and rules that modify and at the same time perpetuate the systems of control and power in the field of dispute. It can be seen that the changes in the new DCNs brought new impetus to training, however, the process of understanding the training structure was simplified, adapting the reality of the area to the panorama of the labor market. In the meantime, the enactment of Law 14.386/2022 accentuated the legalistic and punitive power of the CONFEF/CREF system, granting it broad powers in the dictates concerning professional practice, which can be understood as a restriction of the fundamental principle of the natural freedom of individuals.El objetivo de este texto es contribuir al debate sobre la formación en Educación Física, analizando las nuevas DCN para el área, así como la reedición de la Ley 9.696/98 sobre regulación de la profesión, que bajo la nueva forma de la Ley 14.386 /2022, inserta nuevos actores y reglas que modifican ya la vez perpetúan el sistema de control y poder en el campo de disputa. Se puede apreciar que los cambios en las nuevas DCN dieron un nuevo impulso a la formación, sin embargo, se simplificó el proceso de comprensión de la estructura formativa, adaptando la realidad del área al panorama del mercado laboral. Mientras tanto, la sanción de la Ley 14.386/2022 acentuó el poder legalista y punitivo del sistema CONFEF/CREF, otorgándole amplias facultades en los dictados relativos al ejercicio profesional, lo que puede ser entendido como una restricción del principio fundamental de la libertad natural de indivíduos.O objetivo desse texto é contribuir para o debate sobre a formação em Educação Física, analisando as novas DCNs para área, assim como a reedição da Lei 9696/98 sobre a regulamentação da profissão, que sob a nova roupagem da Lei 14.386/2022, insere novos atores e regras que modificam e ao mesmo tempo perpetuam os sistemas de controle e poder no campo de disputa. Pode-se verificar que as mudanças nas novas DCNs trouxeram novo fôlego para a formação, contudo, o processo de compreensão da estrutura formativa foi simplificado adequando a realidade da área ao panorama do mercado de trabalho. Nesse ínterim, a promulgação da Lei 14.386/2022 acentuou o poder legalista e punitivo do sistema CONFEF/CREF conferindo-o amplos poderes nos ditames concernentes ao exercício profissional, o que pode ser entendido como um cerceamento do princípio fundamental da liberdade natural dos indivíduos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2023-06-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/9329110.5007/2175-8042.2023.e93291Motrivivência; v. 35 n. 66 (2023); 1-192175-80420103-4111reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/93291/53346Copyright (c) 2023 Motrivivênciahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBendrath, Eduard Angelo2024-02-02T11:10:27Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/93291Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/oai||giovani.pires@ufsc.br2175-80420103-4111opendoar:2024-02-02T11:10:27Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesario
Formación profesional en Educación Física en Brasil: un debate necesario
Formação profissional em Educação Física no Brasil: um debate necessário: un debate necesario
title Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesario
spellingShingle Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesario
Bendrath, Eduard Angelo
Regulation
Policy
Physical education
Professional qualification
Formación profesional
Regulación
Política
Educación física
Regulamentação
Política
Educação física
Formação profissional
title_short Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesario
title_full Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesario
title_fullStr Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesario
title_full_unstemmed Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesario
title_sort Professional training in Physical Education in Brazil: a necessary debate: un debate necesario
author Bendrath, Eduard Angelo
author_facet Bendrath, Eduard Angelo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bendrath, Eduard Angelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Regulation
Policy
Physical education
Professional qualification
Formación profesional
Regulación
Política
Educación física
Regulamentação
Política
Educação física
Formação profissional
topic Regulation
Policy
Physical education
Professional qualification
Formación profesional
Regulación
Política
Educación física
Regulamentação
Política
Educação física
Formação profissional
description The purpose of this text is to contribute to the debate on training in Physical Education, analyzing the new DCNs for the area, as well as the reissue of Law 9696/98 on the regulation of the profession, which under the new guise of Law 14.386/2022, inserts new actors and rules that modify and at the same time perpetuate the systems of control and power in the field of dispute. It can be seen that the changes in the new DCNs brought new impetus to training, however, the process of understanding the training structure was simplified, adapting the reality of the area to the panorama of the labor market. In the meantime, the enactment of Law 14.386/2022 accentuated the legalistic and punitive power of the CONFEF/CREF system, granting it broad powers in the dictates concerning professional practice, which can be understood as a restriction of the fundamental principle of the natural freedom of individuals.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/93291
10.5007/2175-8042.2023.e93291
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/93291
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8042.2023.e93291
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/93291/53346
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Motrivivência
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Motrivivência
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Motrivivência; v. 35 n. 66 (2023); 1-19
2175-8042
0103-4111
reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
collection Motrivivência (Florianópolis)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||giovani.pires@ufsc.br
_version_ 1799875253763047424

Registros relacionados