On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Fernando Orphão de
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93
Resumo: In this paper we purport to qualify the claim, advanced by Appelbaum (1999) that speech perception research, in the last 70 years or so, has endorsed a view on the nature of speech for which no evidence can be adduced and which has resisted falsification through active ad hoc “theoretical repair” carried by speech scientists. We show that the author’s qualms on the putative dogmatic status of speech research are utterly unwarranted, if notmisconstrued as a whole. On more general grounds, the present article can be understood as a work on the rather underdeveloped area of the philosophy and history of Linguistics.
id UFSC-5_eb60b404285534eb9f78b193242a9dca
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/13918
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)In this paper we purport to qualify the claim, advanced by Appelbaum (1999) that speech perception research, in the last 70 years or so, has endorsed a view on the nature of speech for which no evidence can be adduced and which has resisted falsification through active ad hoc “theoretical repair” carried by speech scientists. We show that the author’s qualms on the putative dogmatic status of speech research are utterly unwarranted, if notmisconstrued as a whole. On more general grounds, the present article can be understood as a work on the rather underdeveloped area of the philosophy and history of Linguistics.Neste trabalho temos como objetivo criticar o trabalho de Appelbaum (1999) no qual a autora argumenta a favor da posição de que os pesquisadores da área de Percepção de Fala têm defendido uma hipótese acerca da natureza da fala para a qual não há justificativa empírica, mas que tem sido mantida através de “reparos teóricos” efetuados pelos pesquisadores. Nós demonstramos que as considerações da autora acerca do status putativamente dogmático da pesquisa em Percepção de Fala são injustificados. Em termos mais gerais, o presente trabalho pode ser compreendido como um esforço particular de elucidaçãoepistemológica básica dos fundamentos da pesquisa sobre a linguagem.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p9310.5007/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009); 93-103Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2009); 93-103Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 13 n. 1 (2009); 93-1031808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCengporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93/12780https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93/18054Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Orphão de Carvalhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Fernando Orphão de2019-09-12T10:21:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/13918Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-12T10:21:42Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
title On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
spellingShingle On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
Carvalho, Fernando Orphão de
title_short On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
title_full On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
title_fullStr On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
title_full_unstemmed On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
title_sort On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
author Carvalho, Fernando Orphão de
author_facet Carvalho, Fernando Orphão de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Fernando Orphão de
description In this paper we purport to qualify the claim, advanced by Appelbaum (1999) that speech perception research, in the last 70 years or so, has endorsed a view on the nature of speech for which no evidence can be adduced and which has resisted falsification through active ad hoc “theoretical repair” carried by speech scientists. We show that the author’s qualms on the putative dogmatic status of speech research are utterly unwarranted, if notmisconstrued as a whole. On more general grounds, the present article can be understood as a work on the rather underdeveloped area of the philosophy and history of Linguistics.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93
10.5007/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93/12780
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93/18054
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Orphão de Carvalho
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Orphão de Carvalho
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009); 93-103
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2009); 93-103
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 13 n. 1 (2009); 93-103
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435108893130752

Registros relacionados