On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93 |
Resumo: | In this paper we purport to qualify the claim, advanced by Appelbaum (1999) that speech perception research, in the last 70 years or so, has endorsed a view on the nature of speech for which no evidence can be adduced and which has resisted falsification through active ad hoc “theoretical repair” carried by speech scientists. We show that the author’s qualms on the putative dogmatic status of speech research are utterly unwarranted, if notmisconstrued as a whole. On more general grounds, the present article can be understood as a work on the rather underdeveloped area of the philosophy and history of Linguistics. |
id |
UFSC-5_eb60b404285534eb9f78b193242a9dca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/13918 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999)In this paper we purport to qualify the claim, advanced by Appelbaum (1999) that speech perception research, in the last 70 years or so, has endorsed a view on the nature of speech for which no evidence can be adduced and which has resisted falsification through active ad hoc “theoretical repair” carried by speech scientists. We show that the author’s qualms on the putative dogmatic status of speech research are utterly unwarranted, if notmisconstrued as a whole. On more general grounds, the present article can be understood as a work on the rather underdeveloped area of the philosophy and history of Linguistics.Neste trabalho temos como objetivo criticar o trabalho de Appelbaum (1999) no qual a autora argumenta a favor da posição de que os pesquisadores da área de Percepção de Fala têm defendido uma hipótese acerca da natureza da fala para a qual não há justificativa empírica, mas que tem sido mantida através de “reparos teóricos” efetuados pelos pesquisadores. Nós demonstramos que as considerações da autora acerca do status putativamente dogmático da pesquisa em Percepção de Fala são injustificados. Em termos mais gerais, o presente trabalho pode ser compreendido como um esforço particular de elucidaçãoepistemológica básica dos fundamentos da pesquisa sobre a linguagem.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p9310.5007/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009); 93-103Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2009); 93-103Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 13 n. 1 (2009); 93-1031808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCengporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93/12780https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93/18054Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Orphão de Carvalhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Fernando Orphão de2019-09-12T10:21:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/13918Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-12T10:21:42Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999) On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999) |
title |
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999) |
spellingShingle |
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999) Carvalho, Fernando Orphão de |
title_short |
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999) |
title_full |
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999) |
title_fullStr |
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999) |
title_full_unstemmed |
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999) |
title_sort |
On a Supposed Dogma of Speech Perception Research: A Response to Appelbaum (1999) |
author |
Carvalho, Fernando Orphão de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Fernando Orphão de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Fernando Orphão de |
description |
In this paper we purport to qualify the claim, advanced by Appelbaum (1999) that speech perception research, in the last 70 years or so, has endorsed a view on the nature of speech for which no evidence can be adduced and which has resisted falsification through active ad hoc “theoretical repair” carried by speech scientists. We show that the author’s qualms on the putative dogmatic status of speech research are utterly unwarranted, if notmisconstrued as a whole. On more general grounds, the present article can be understood as a work on the rather underdeveloped area of the philosophy and history of Linguistics. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93 10.5007/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93/12780 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2009v13n1p93/18054 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Orphão de Carvalho info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Orphão de Carvalho |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009); 93-103 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2009); 93-103 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 13 n. 1 (2009); 93-103 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435108893130752 |