Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Poulain, Alexandra
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ilha do Desterro
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233
Resumo: Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I, first written in French in the late 1950s, picks up the theme of Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon—itself based on earlier material, including Synge’s The Well of the Saints. Staging mutually dependent disabled bodies and charting the elaboration of joint poetic vision, both plays also paradoxically focus on the dramaturgical and poetic potential of collaborative failure. While Yeats insisted that his play should be read allegorically as a dramatisation of the journey towards Unity of Being, this paper attempts to take it at face value, alongside Beckett’s sequel, reading them both as dramas of (failed) collaboration between disabled, mutually complementary bodies. More specifically, it argues that despite Yeats’s best effort to allegorise the grotesque bodies on the stage into abstract principles of Body and Soul, something in his play refuses to be subsumed into allegory and resists the play’s drive towards unity. This resistant “something” has to do with the queer (in every sense) version of love which is being played out on the stage, and it is precisely this queer, sadomasochistic, unproductive love, and the jouissance it procures, uncomfortably, for two disabled characters, which becomes the central theme of Beckett’s play. Further, the paper suggests that this motif of queer love doubles as a paradigm for an alternative form of literary collaboration, one which is not geared towards the actual production of a finished marketable product such as a book or a play, but rather towards the shared creation and immediate enjoyment of stories invented and performed in a space removed from, yet marginal to, the sphere of modern capitalistic exchange.
id UFSC-9_ed6876d81d0e923653f067683cbfe151
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/56346
network_acronym_str UFSC-9
network_name_str Ilha do Desterro
repository_id_str
spelling Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre IColaboração fracassada e amor queer em The Cat and the Moon de Yeats e Rough for Theatre I de BeckettBeckett’s Rough for Theatre I, first written in French in the late 1950s, picks up the theme of Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon—itself based on earlier material, including Synge’s The Well of the Saints. Staging mutually dependent disabled bodies and charting the elaboration of joint poetic vision, both plays also paradoxically focus on the dramaturgical and poetic potential of collaborative failure. While Yeats insisted that his play should be read allegorically as a dramatisation of the journey towards Unity of Being, this paper attempts to take it at face value, alongside Beckett’s sequel, reading them both as dramas of (failed) collaboration between disabled, mutually complementary bodies. More specifically, it argues that despite Yeats’s best effort to allegorise the grotesque bodies on the stage into abstract principles of Body and Soul, something in his play refuses to be subsumed into allegory and resists the play’s drive towards unity. This resistant “something” has to do with the queer (in every sense) version of love which is being played out on the stage, and it is precisely this queer, sadomasochistic, unproductive love, and the jouissance it procures, uncomfortably, for two disabled characters, which becomes the central theme of Beckett’s play. Further, the paper suggests that this motif of queer love doubles as a paradigm for an alternative form of literary collaboration, one which is not geared towards the actual production of a finished marketable product such as a book or a play, but rather towards the shared creation and immediate enjoyment of stories invented and performed in a space removed from, yet marginal to, the sphere of modern capitalistic exchange.Rough for Theatre de Beckett I, escrito pela primeira vez em francês no final da década de 1950, aborda o tema O gato e a lua de Yeats - baseado em material anterior, incluindo The Well of the Saints, de Synge. Encenando corpos deficientes mutuamente dependentes e elaborando a elaboração da visão poética conjunta, ambas as peças também concentram-se, paradoxalmente, no potencial poético e poético do fracasso colaborativo. Enquanto Yeats insistia que sua peça deveria ser lida alegoricamente como uma dramatização da jornada rumo à Unidade do Ser, este artigo tenta levá-la a sério, ao lado da continuação de Beckett, lendo-as como dramas de colaboração fracassada entre deficientes, mutuamente complementares. corpos. Mais especificamente, argumenta que, apesar do melhor esforço de Yeats para alegorizar os corpos grotescos no palco em princípios abstratos de Corpo e Alma, algo em sua peça se recusa a ser incluído na alegoria e resiste ao impulso da peça em direção à unidade. Essa “coisa” resistente tem a ver com a versão queer (em todos os sentidos) do amor que está sendo tocada no palco, e é precisamente esse amor queer, sadomasoquista e improdutivo, e o gozo que ele oferece, desconfortavelmente, por dois anos. personagens com deficiência, que se torna o tema central da peça de Beckett. Além disso, o artigo sugere que esse motivo do amor queer duplica como paradigma de uma forma alternativa de colaboração literária, que não é voltada para a produção real de um produto comercializável acabado, como um livro ou uma peça, mas sim para o compartilhamento criação e desfrute imediato de histórias inventadas e executadas em um espaço removido, ainda que marginal, da esfera da troca capitalista moderna.UFSC2018-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p23310.5007/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; Vol. 71 No. 2 (2018): Artistic Collaborations; 233-244Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; v. 71 n. 2 (2018): Artistic Collaborations; 233-2442175-80260101-4846reponame:Ilha do Desterroinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233/36798Copyright (c) 2018 Alexandra Poulaininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPoulain, Alexandra2018-06-05T15:20:13Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/56346Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterroPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/oaiilha@cce.ufsc.br||corseuil@cce.ufsc.br||ilhadodesterro@gmail.com2175-80260101-4846opendoar:2018-06-05T15:20:13Ilha do Desterro - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I
Colaboração fracassada e amor queer em The Cat and the Moon de Yeats e Rough for Theatre I de Beckett
title Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I
spellingShingle Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I
Poulain, Alexandra
title_short Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I
title_full Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I
title_fullStr Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I
title_full_unstemmed Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I
title_sort Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I
author Poulain, Alexandra
author_facet Poulain, Alexandra
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Poulain, Alexandra
description Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I, first written in French in the late 1950s, picks up the theme of Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon—itself based on earlier material, including Synge’s The Well of the Saints. Staging mutually dependent disabled bodies and charting the elaboration of joint poetic vision, both plays also paradoxically focus on the dramaturgical and poetic potential of collaborative failure. While Yeats insisted that his play should be read allegorically as a dramatisation of the journey towards Unity of Being, this paper attempts to take it at face value, alongside Beckett’s sequel, reading them both as dramas of (failed) collaboration between disabled, mutually complementary bodies. More specifically, it argues that despite Yeats’s best effort to allegorise the grotesque bodies on the stage into abstract principles of Body and Soul, something in his play refuses to be subsumed into allegory and resists the play’s drive towards unity. This resistant “something” has to do with the queer (in every sense) version of love which is being played out on the stage, and it is precisely this queer, sadomasochistic, unproductive love, and the jouissance it procures, uncomfortably, for two disabled characters, which becomes the central theme of Beckett’s play. Further, the paper suggests that this motif of queer love doubles as a paradigm for an alternative form of literary collaboration, one which is not geared towards the actual production of a finished marketable product such as a book or a play, but rather towards the shared creation and immediate enjoyment of stories invented and performed in a space removed from, yet marginal to, the sphere of modern capitalistic exchange.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233
10.5007/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233/36798
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Alexandra Poulain
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Alexandra Poulain
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; Vol. 71 No. 2 (2018): Artistic Collaborations; 233-244
Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; v. 71 n. 2 (2018): Artistic Collaborations; 233-244
2175-8026
0101-4846
reponame:Ilha do Desterro
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Ilha do Desterro
collection Ilha do Desterro
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ilha do Desterro - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ilha@cce.ufsc.br||corseuil@cce.ufsc.br||ilhadodesterro@gmail.com
_version_ 1789434829026099200