Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ilha do Desterro |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233 |
Resumo: | Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I, first written in French in the late 1950s, picks up the theme of Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon—itself based on earlier material, including Synge’s The Well of the Saints. Staging mutually dependent disabled bodies and charting the elaboration of joint poetic vision, both plays also paradoxically focus on the dramaturgical and poetic potential of collaborative failure. While Yeats insisted that his play should be read allegorically as a dramatisation of the journey towards Unity of Being, this paper attempts to take it at face value, alongside Beckett’s sequel, reading them both as dramas of (failed) collaboration between disabled, mutually complementary bodies. More specifically, it argues that despite Yeats’s best effort to allegorise the grotesque bodies on the stage into abstract principles of Body and Soul, something in his play refuses to be subsumed into allegory and resists the play’s drive towards unity. This resistant “something” has to do with the queer (in every sense) version of love which is being played out on the stage, and it is precisely this queer, sadomasochistic, unproductive love, and the jouissance it procures, uncomfortably, for two disabled characters, which becomes the central theme of Beckett’s play. Further, the paper suggests that this motif of queer love doubles as a paradigm for an alternative form of literary collaboration, one which is not geared towards the actual production of a finished marketable product such as a book or a play, but rather towards the shared creation and immediate enjoyment of stories invented and performed in a space removed from, yet marginal to, the sphere of modern capitalistic exchange. |
id |
UFSC-9_ed6876d81d0e923653f067683cbfe151 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/56346 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-9 |
network_name_str |
Ilha do Desterro |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre IColaboração fracassada e amor queer em The Cat and the Moon de Yeats e Rough for Theatre I de BeckettBeckett’s Rough for Theatre I, first written in French in the late 1950s, picks up the theme of Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon—itself based on earlier material, including Synge’s The Well of the Saints. Staging mutually dependent disabled bodies and charting the elaboration of joint poetic vision, both plays also paradoxically focus on the dramaturgical and poetic potential of collaborative failure. While Yeats insisted that his play should be read allegorically as a dramatisation of the journey towards Unity of Being, this paper attempts to take it at face value, alongside Beckett’s sequel, reading them both as dramas of (failed) collaboration between disabled, mutually complementary bodies. More specifically, it argues that despite Yeats’s best effort to allegorise the grotesque bodies on the stage into abstract principles of Body and Soul, something in his play refuses to be subsumed into allegory and resists the play’s drive towards unity. This resistant “something” has to do with the queer (in every sense) version of love which is being played out on the stage, and it is precisely this queer, sadomasochistic, unproductive love, and the jouissance it procures, uncomfortably, for two disabled characters, which becomes the central theme of Beckett’s play. Further, the paper suggests that this motif of queer love doubles as a paradigm for an alternative form of literary collaboration, one which is not geared towards the actual production of a finished marketable product such as a book or a play, but rather towards the shared creation and immediate enjoyment of stories invented and performed in a space removed from, yet marginal to, the sphere of modern capitalistic exchange.Rough for Theatre de Beckett I, escrito pela primeira vez em francês no final da década de 1950, aborda o tema O gato e a lua de Yeats - baseado em material anterior, incluindo The Well of the Saints, de Synge. Encenando corpos deficientes mutuamente dependentes e elaborando a elaboração da visão poética conjunta, ambas as peças também concentram-se, paradoxalmente, no potencial poético e poético do fracasso colaborativo. Enquanto Yeats insistia que sua peça deveria ser lida alegoricamente como uma dramatização da jornada rumo à Unidade do Ser, este artigo tenta levá-la a sério, ao lado da continuação de Beckett, lendo-as como dramas de colaboração fracassada entre deficientes, mutuamente complementares. corpos. Mais especificamente, argumenta que, apesar do melhor esforço de Yeats para alegorizar os corpos grotescos no palco em princípios abstratos de Corpo e Alma, algo em sua peça se recusa a ser incluído na alegoria e resiste ao impulso da peça em direção à unidade. Essa “coisa” resistente tem a ver com a versão queer (em todos os sentidos) do amor que está sendo tocada no palco, e é precisamente esse amor queer, sadomasoquista e improdutivo, e o gozo que ele oferece, desconfortavelmente, por dois anos. personagens com deficiência, que se torna o tema central da peça de Beckett. Além disso, o artigo sugere que esse motivo do amor queer duplica como paradigma de uma forma alternativa de colaboração literária, que não é voltada para a produção real de um produto comercializável acabado, como um livro ou uma peça, mas sim para o compartilhamento criação e desfrute imediato de histórias inventadas e executadas em um espaço removido, ainda que marginal, da esfera da troca capitalista moderna.UFSC2018-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p23310.5007/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; Vol. 71 No. 2 (2018): Artistic Collaborations; 233-244Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; v. 71 n. 2 (2018): Artistic Collaborations; 233-2442175-80260101-4846reponame:Ilha do Desterroinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233/36798Copyright (c) 2018 Alexandra Poulaininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPoulain, Alexandra2018-06-05T15:20:13Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/56346Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterroPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/oaiilha@cce.ufsc.br||corseuil@cce.ufsc.br||ilhadodesterro@gmail.com2175-80260101-4846opendoar:2018-06-05T15:20:13Ilha do Desterro - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I Colaboração fracassada e amor queer em The Cat and the Moon de Yeats e Rough for Theatre I de Beckett |
title |
Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I |
spellingShingle |
Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I Poulain, Alexandra |
title_short |
Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I |
title_full |
Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I |
title_fullStr |
Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I |
title_full_unstemmed |
Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I |
title_sort |
Failed collaboration and queer love in Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon and Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I |
author |
Poulain, Alexandra |
author_facet |
Poulain, Alexandra |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Poulain, Alexandra |
description |
Beckett’s Rough for Theatre I, first written in French in the late 1950s, picks up the theme of Yeats’s The Cat and the Moon—itself based on earlier material, including Synge’s The Well of the Saints. Staging mutually dependent disabled bodies and charting the elaboration of joint poetic vision, both plays also paradoxically focus on the dramaturgical and poetic potential of collaborative failure. While Yeats insisted that his play should be read allegorically as a dramatisation of the journey towards Unity of Being, this paper attempts to take it at face value, alongside Beckett’s sequel, reading them both as dramas of (failed) collaboration between disabled, mutually complementary bodies. More specifically, it argues that despite Yeats’s best effort to allegorise the grotesque bodies on the stage into abstract principles of Body and Soul, something in his play refuses to be subsumed into allegory and resists the play’s drive towards unity. This resistant “something” has to do with the queer (in every sense) version of love which is being played out on the stage, and it is precisely this queer, sadomasochistic, unproductive love, and the jouissance it procures, uncomfortably, for two disabled characters, which becomes the central theme of Beckett’s play. Further, the paper suggests that this motif of queer love doubles as a paradigm for an alternative form of literary collaboration, one which is not geared towards the actual production of a finished marketable product such as a book or a play, but rather towards the shared creation and immediate enjoyment of stories invented and performed in a space removed from, yet marginal to, the sphere of modern capitalistic exchange. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233 10.5007/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/desterro/article/view/2175-8026.2018v71n2p233/36798 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Alexandra Poulain info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Alexandra Poulain |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; Vol. 71 No. 2 (2018): Artistic Collaborations; 233-244 Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies; v. 71 n. 2 (2018): Artistic Collaborations; 233-244 2175-8026 0101-4846 reponame:Ilha do Desterro instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Ilha do Desterro |
collection |
Ilha do Desterro |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ilha do Desterro - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ilha@cce.ufsc.br||corseuil@cce.ufsc.br||ilhadodesterro@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1789434829026099200 |