Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Gestão & Produção |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2010000200007 |
Resumo: | The main objective of this study was to use the business process management methodology to strengthen the process of "Economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste". A methodology based on the PDCA cycle was used, which allowed the indication of the key point (inventory of technology), the critical success factor (selection of the adopted technologies), the main problem (non-assessment of technology), and major causes of the problem. The advantages obtained with the implementation of the BPM are: providing information to process managers and quality work since this analysis clearly defined the objective, customers, performance indicators, products, and expected results. The importance of an organized and available database that provides information on demands, research results, and the development stage of technologies was verified. Internal clients were made aware of the process importance. The process also proved a useful tool for the R&D management stages: 1) demand establishment, 2) development and implementation of projects, 3) dissemination, transfer, and innovation, and 4) impact assessment. There are several discontinuities in the management of R & D. The BPM can be assimilated and implemented by public research institutions and its use should be constantly encouraged. |
id |
UFSCAR-3_4a158de0564b7ec70e07533a3086db2a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-530X2010000200007 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSCAR-3 |
network_name_str |
Gestão & Produção |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária SudesteBusiness process managementQuality improvementPDCA cycleBrainstormingThe main objective of this study was to use the business process management methodology to strengthen the process of "Economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste". A methodology based on the PDCA cycle was used, which allowed the indication of the key point (inventory of technology), the critical success factor (selection of the adopted technologies), the main problem (non-assessment of technology), and major causes of the problem. The advantages obtained with the implementation of the BPM are: providing information to process managers and quality work since this analysis clearly defined the objective, customers, performance indicators, products, and expected results. The importance of an organized and available database that provides information on demands, research results, and the development stage of technologies was verified. Internal clients were made aware of the process importance. The process also proved a useful tool for the R&D management stages: 1) demand establishment, 2) development and implementation of projects, 3) dissemination, transfer, and innovation, and 4) impact assessment. There are several discontinuities in the management of R & D. The BPM can be assimilated and implemented by public research institutions and its use should be constantly encouraged.Universidade Federal de São Carlos2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2010000200007Gestão & Produção v.17 n.2 2010reponame:Gestão & Produçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCAR10.1590/S0104-530X2010000200007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBernardi,Alberto Carlos de CamposRodrigues,Armando de AndradeMendonça,Fernando CamposTupy,OscarBarioni Junior,WladomiroPrimavesi,Odoeng2010-08-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-530X2010000200007Revistahttps://www.gestaoeproducao.com/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpgp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br1806-96490104-530Xopendoar:2010-08-04T00:00Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste |
title |
Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste |
spellingShingle |
Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste Bernardi,Alberto Carlos de Campos Business process management Quality improvement PDCA cycle Brainstorming |
title_short |
Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste |
title_full |
Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste |
title_fullStr |
Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste |
title_sort |
Analysis and improvement of the process of economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste |
author |
Bernardi,Alberto Carlos de Campos |
author_facet |
Bernardi,Alberto Carlos de Campos Rodrigues,Armando de Andrade Mendonça,Fernando Campos Tupy,Oscar Barioni Junior,Wladomiro Primavesi,Odo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues,Armando de Andrade Mendonça,Fernando Campos Tupy,Oscar Barioni Junior,Wladomiro Primavesi,Odo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bernardi,Alberto Carlos de Campos Rodrigues,Armando de Andrade Mendonça,Fernando Campos Tupy,Oscar Barioni Junior,Wladomiro Primavesi,Odo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Business process management Quality improvement PDCA cycle Brainstorming |
topic |
Business process management Quality improvement PDCA cycle Brainstorming |
description |
The main objective of this study was to use the business process management methodology to strengthen the process of "Economic, social, and environmental impact assessment of technologies from Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste". A methodology based on the PDCA cycle was used, which allowed the indication of the key point (inventory of technology), the critical success factor (selection of the adopted technologies), the main problem (non-assessment of technology), and major causes of the problem. The advantages obtained with the implementation of the BPM are: providing information to process managers and quality work since this analysis clearly defined the objective, customers, performance indicators, products, and expected results. The importance of an organized and available database that provides information on demands, research results, and the development stage of technologies was verified. Internal clients were made aware of the process importance. The process also proved a useful tool for the R&D management stages: 1) demand establishment, 2) development and implementation of projects, 3) dissemination, transfer, and innovation, and 4) impact assessment. There are several discontinuities in the management of R & D. The BPM can be assimilated and implemented by public research institutions and its use should be constantly encouraged. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2010000200007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2010000200007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0104-530X2010000200007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção v.17 n.2 2010 reponame:Gestão & Produção instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Gestão & Produção |
collection |
Gestão & Produção |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1750118203099447296 |