Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Viero,Andreia
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Trojan,Flavio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Gestão & Produção
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2020000300215
Resumo: Abstract: This study aims to identify the integration between quality tools and multi-criteria methods, using a bibliometric and systemic analysis. In order to meet this research objective, the methodology used to select the bibliographic portfolio, perform the bibliometric and systemic analysis was the ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process – Constructivist). As result were selected 17 articles that represented the bibliographic portfolio and 351 articles as reference for the bibliographic portfolio. The results highlight the journals: Expert Systems with Applications e Applied Soft Computing Journal. The most aligned articles with the theme were, “Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment”, and “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”. In the systemic analysis were considered six lenses, according to the theoretical affiliation MCDA-C, and was concluded that the articles were not totally aligned with this specific affiliation. The AHP and TOPSIS methods stood out as the most used methods in this portfolio. It was verified that the quality tools when used integrated with multi-criteria methods allow the creation of decision making evaluation models for scenarios present in the papers found in this research.
id UFSCAR-3_6414b947e7519814b4d43e6f3776c038
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-530X2020000300215
network_acronym_str UFSCAR-3
network_name_str Gestão & Produção
repository_id_str
spelling Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysisQualityQuality toolsMulti-criteria methodsProKnow-CBibliometric analysisSystemic analysisAbstract: This study aims to identify the integration between quality tools and multi-criteria methods, using a bibliometric and systemic analysis. In order to meet this research objective, the methodology used to select the bibliographic portfolio, perform the bibliometric and systemic analysis was the ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process – Constructivist). As result were selected 17 articles that represented the bibliographic portfolio and 351 articles as reference for the bibliographic portfolio. The results highlight the journals: Expert Systems with Applications e Applied Soft Computing Journal. The most aligned articles with the theme were, “Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment”, and “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”. In the systemic analysis were considered six lenses, according to the theoretical affiliation MCDA-C, and was concluded that the articles were not totally aligned with this specific affiliation. The AHP and TOPSIS methods stood out as the most used methods in this portfolio. It was verified that the quality tools when used integrated with multi-criteria methods allow the creation of decision making evaluation models for scenarios present in the papers found in this research.Universidade Federal de São Carlos2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2020000300215Gestão & Produção v.27 n.3 2020reponame:Gestão & Produçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCAR10.1590/0104-530x4358-20info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessViero,AndreiaTrojan,Flavioeng2020-07-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-530X2020000300215Revistahttps://www.gestaoeproducao.com/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpgp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br1806-96490104-530Xopendoar:2020-07-21T00:00Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis
title Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis
spellingShingle Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis
Viero,Andreia
Quality
Quality tools
Multi-criteria methods
ProKnow-C
Bibliometric analysis
Systemic analysis
title_short Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis
title_full Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis
title_fullStr Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis
title_sort Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis
author Viero,Andreia
author_facet Viero,Andreia
Trojan,Flavio
author_role author
author2 Trojan,Flavio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viero,Andreia
Trojan,Flavio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Quality
Quality tools
Multi-criteria methods
ProKnow-C
Bibliometric analysis
Systemic analysis
topic Quality
Quality tools
Multi-criteria methods
ProKnow-C
Bibliometric analysis
Systemic analysis
description Abstract: This study aims to identify the integration between quality tools and multi-criteria methods, using a bibliometric and systemic analysis. In order to meet this research objective, the methodology used to select the bibliographic portfolio, perform the bibliometric and systemic analysis was the ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process – Constructivist). As result were selected 17 articles that represented the bibliographic portfolio and 351 articles as reference for the bibliographic portfolio. The results highlight the journals: Expert Systems with Applications e Applied Soft Computing Journal. The most aligned articles with the theme were, “Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment”, and “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”. In the systemic analysis were considered six lenses, according to the theoretical affiliation MCDA-C, and was concluded that the articles were not totally aligned with this specific affiliation. The AHP and TOPSIS methods stood out as the most used methods in this portfolio. It was verified that the quality tools when used integrated with multi-criteria methods allow the creation of decision making evaluation models for scenarios present in the papers found in this research.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2020000300215
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2020000300215
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0104-530x4358-20
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gestão & Produção v.27 n.3 2020
reponame:Gestão & Produção
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Gestão & Produção
collection Gestão & Produção
repository.name.fl_str_mv Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv gp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br
_version_ 1750118207262294016