Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Gestão & Produção |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2020000300215 |
Resumo: | Abstract: This study aims to identify the integration between quality tools and multi-criteria methods, using a bibliometric and systemic analysis. In order to meet this research objective, the methodology used to select the bibliographic portfolio, perform the bibliometric and systemic analysis was the ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process – Constructivist). As result were selected 17 articles that represented the bibliographic portfolio and 351 articles as reference for the bibliographic portfolio. The results highlight the journals: Expert Systems with Applications e Applied Soft Computing Journal. The most aligned articles with the theme were, “Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment”, and “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”. In the systemic analysis were considered six lenses, according to the theoretical affiliation MCDA-C, and was concluded that the articles were not totally aligned with this specific affiliation. The AHP and TOPSIS methods stood out as the most used methods in this portfolio. It was verified that the quality tools when used integrated with multi-criteria methods allow the creation of decision making evaluation models for scenarios present in the papers found in this research. |
id |
UFSCAR-3_6414b947e7519814b4d43e6f3776c038 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-530X2020000300215 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSCAR-3 |
network_name_str |
Gestão & Produção |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysisQualityQuality toolsMulti-criteria methodsProKnow-CBibliometric analysisSystemic analysisAbstract: This study aims to identify the integration between quality tools and multi-criteria methods, using a bibliometric and systemic analysis. In order to meet this research objective, the methodology used to select the bibliographic portfolio, perform the bibliometric and systemic analysis was the ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process – Constructivist). As result were selected 17 articles that represented the bibliographic portfolio and 351 articles as reference for the bibliographic portfolio. The results highlight the journals: Expert Systems with Applications e Applied Soft Computing Journal. The most aligned articles with the theme were, “Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment”, and “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”. In the systemic analysis were considered six lenses, according to the theoretical affiliation MCDA-C, and was concluded that the articles were not totally aligned with this specific affiliation. The AHP and TOPSIS methods stood out as the most used methods in this portfolio. It was verified that the quality tools when used integrated with multi-criteria methods allow the creation of decision making evaluation models for scenarios present in the papers found in this research.Universidade Federal de São Carlos2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2020000300215Gestão & Produção v.27 n.3 2020reponame:Gestão & Produçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCAR10.1590/0104-530x4358-20info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessViero,AndreiaTrojan,Flavioeng2020-07-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-530X2020000300215Revistahttps://www.gestaoeproducao.com/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpgp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br1806-96490104-530Xopendoar:2020-07-21T00:00Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis |
title |
Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis |
spellingShingle |
Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis Viero,Andreia Quality Quality tools Multi-criteria methods ProKnow-C Bibliometric analysis Systemic analysis |
title_short |
Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis |
title_full |
Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis |
title_fullStr |
Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis |
title_sort |
Integration of quality tools and multi-criteria methods: a bibliometric and systemic analysis |
author |
Viero,Andreia |
author_facet |
Viero,Andreia Trojan,Flavio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Trojan,Flavio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Viero,Andreia Trojan,Flavio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Quality Quality tools Multi-criteria methods ProKnow-C Bibliometric analysis Systemic analysis |
topic |
Quality Quality tools Multi-criteria methods ProKnow-C Bibliometric analysis Systemic analysis |
description |
Abstract: This study aims to identify the integration between quality tools and multi-criteria methods, using a bibliometric and systemic analysis. In order to meet this research objective, the methodology used to select the bibliographic portfolio, perform the bibliometric and systemic analysis was the ProKnow-C (Knowledge Development Process – Constructivist). As result were selected 17 articles that represented the bibliographic portfolio and 351 articles as reference for the bibliographic portfolio. The results highlight the journals: Expert Systems with Applications e Applied Soft Computing Journal. The most aligned articles with the theme were, “Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment”, and “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”. In the systemic analysis were considered six lenses, according to the theoretical affiliation MCDA-C, and was concluded that the articles were not totally aligned with this specific affiliation. The AHP and TOPSIS methods stood out as the most used methods in this portfolio. It was verified that the quality tools when used integrated with multi-criteria methods allow the creation of decision making evaluation models for scenarios present in the papers found in this research. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2020000300215 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2020000300215 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0104-530x4358-20 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção v.27 n.3 2020 reponame:Gestão & Produção instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Gestão & Produção |
collection |
Gestão & Produção |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Gestão & Produção - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gp@dep.ufscar.br||revistagestaoemanalise@unichristus.edu.br |
_version_ |
1750118207262294016 |