Respostas agudas e subagudas dotreinamento resistido em normotensos e hipertensos: comparação entre pesos livres e resistência manual

• Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, Cauê Vazquez La Scala [UNIFESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
• Texto Completo: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/trabalhoConclusao/viewTrabalhoConclusao.jsf?popup=true&id_trabalho=2371226; https://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/46969
• topic: Hipertension; Strength training; Manual resistance training; Diabetes; Hipertensão arterial; Treinamento de força; Treinamento resistido manual; Diabetes

Objective:To compare the acute and sub acute hemodynamic, biochemical and psychobiological responses between manual resistance training (TRM) and free weight resistance training (TRPL) in normotensive (NT) and hypertensive (HT) men. Methods:26 men (14 NT, 40.29+8.63 years, BMI = 26.53+5.24 Kg/m²; 12 HT, 46.00+9.13 years, BMI = 32.51+4.41 Kg/m²), non-exercising,underwent single TRM and TRPL workouts, with a minimum interval of 72 hours between them. It were measured: blood pressure (PA), double product (DP), capillary glycemia (GLIC), capillary lactate (LAC), feeling (AFET), anxiety (ANS) and mood (HUM). Different assessment times were adopted for each variable: GLIC, LAC, ANS, TENS and HUM (pre and post); DP and AFET (half and post); PA (pre and 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post). In addition, one questionnaire was applied to identify positive and negative points of both interventions. For data analysis, we used analysis of variance with repeated measures and Bonferroni's post hoc. It adopted P <0.05 for significance level. To ANS and HUM, itwas used delta percentage (?%) and effect size (ES). The analysis of the qualitative questionnaire considered the frequency that each positive and negative points were quoted. Results:TRM and TRPL were similar in PA responses after training in both groups. In HT, there was post exercise hypotension 15, 30 and 60 minutes post in mean blood pressure and blood pressure average in both interventions. The DP was greater in the TRM, but within the limits of cardiovascular safety. The LAC increased in both interventions, however it was higher in TRM. The GLIC decreased compared to pre in both interventions. No intervention was effective in significantly improve the initial values of ANS, however the TRM had more relevant delta and ES. The AFET during and post the sessions did not differ between groups and interventions, and the reported averages were positive ("good"). In negative factor of HUM, the TRM provided greater magnitude to decrease in ?% and ES. TRM had more positives and less negatives points mentioned by the sample relative to TRPL. Conclusion:TRM is a viable and safety alternative for application of TR in NT and HT, reducing the need for place or specific equipment.