Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb Interpretation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Cleuza Beatriz Baptista da
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Lomônaco, José Fernando Bitencourt
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17215
Resumo: An instrumentto evaluate concrete and abstract types of thinking was constructed and validated. The conducted as follows. 1) Selection of 104 proverbs commonly used in Brazil. 2) Evaluation of the familiarity and intelligibilityof the proverbs'words by a group of children. Proverbs not easily understood were excluded. 3) Evaluation of the proverbs'familiarity by ten adult judges. 4) Content validity of the instrument - three options of answer were defined for each proverb:concrete, abstract and irrelevant. Five judges evaluated these options as indicative of concrete or abstract thinking, or as notbeing related to the meaning of the proverbs. Only those alternatives with a high degree of agreement among the judges wereaccepted. 5) Analysis of the discriminam power and reliability - the instrument was administered to 195 children and teenagersbetween 8 and 15 years old. The statistical analysis revealed an instrument with high discriminant power and reliability.
id UNB-4_f1991955833fa49d03ae73977c8315cf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17215
network_acronym_str UNB-4
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb InterpretationElaboração e Validação de um Instrumento para Avaliar Tipos de Pensamento Através da Interpretação de ProvérbiosTeste de provérbiosDesenvolvimento cognitivoPensamento concreto e abstratoProverbs testCognitive developmentConcrete and abstract thinkingAn instrumentto evaluate concrete and abstract types of thinking was constructed and validated. The conducted as follows. 1) Selection of 104 proverbs commonly used in Brazil. 2) Evaluation of the familiarity and intelligibilityof the proverbs'words by a group of children. Proverbs not easily understood were excluded. 3) Evaluation of the proverbs'familiarity by ten adult judges. 4) Content validity of the instrument - three options of answer were defined for each proverb:concrete, abstract and irrelevant. Five judges evaluated these options as indicative of concrete or abstract thinking, or as notbeing related to the meaning of the proverbs. Only those alternatives with a high degree of agreement among the judges wereaccepted. 5) Analysis of the discriminam power and reliability - the instrument was administered to 195 children and teenagersbetween 8 and 15 years old. The statistical analysis revealed an instrument with high discriminant power and reliability.Foi elaborado e validado um instrumento destinado a avaliar tipos de pensamento - concreto e abstrato - através da interpretação de provérbios. O trabalho foi desenvolvido nas etapas que se seguem. 1) Arrolamento e seleção de 104 provérbios comumente usados em nosso meio. 2) Avaliação da familiaridade e inteligibilidade das palavras dos provérbios por um grupo de crianças. Os provérbios que apresentaram dificuldades de compreensão foram eliminados. 3) Avaliação da familiaridade dos provérbios por dez juizes adultos. 4) Análise da validade de conteúdo do instrumento. Para cada provérbio foram elaboradas três alternativas de resposta, concreta, abstrata e irrelevante. Cinco juizes avaliaram tais alternativas como indicativas de concretude ou abstração, ou como desligadas quer do sentido literal quer do sentido metafórico do provérbio. Apenas as alternativas que apresentaram um alto grau de concordância entre os juizes foram aceitas. 5) Análise do poder discriminativo e da precisão do instrumento, através de sua aplicação a 195 crianças e adolescentes entre 8 e 15 anos. A análise estatística revelou um instrumento com alto poder discriminativo e elevada precisão.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2012-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17215Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 11 No. 1 (1995): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisaPsicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (1995): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisaPsicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 11 No. 1 (1995): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisaPsicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 11 n. 1 (1995): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa1806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17215/15684https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17215/15706Silva, Cleuza Beatriz Baptista daLomônaco, José Fernando Bitencourtinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-10-18T13:40:58Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17215Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2018-10-18T13:40:58Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb Interpretation
Elaboração e Validação de um Instrumento para Avaliar Tipos de Pensamento Através da Interpretação de Provérbios
title Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb Interpretation
spellingShingle Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb Interpretation
Silva, Cleuza Beatriz Baptista da
Teste de provérbios
Desenvolvimento cognitivo
Pensamento concreto e abstrato
Proverbs test
Cognitive development
Concrete and abstract thinking
title_short Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb Interpretation
title_full Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb Interpretation
title_fullStr Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb Interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb Interpretation
title_sort Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Types of Thinking Through Proverb Interpretation
author Silva, Cleuza Beatriz Baptista da
author_facet Silva, Cleuza Beatriz Baptista da
Lomônaco, José Fernando Bitencourt
author_role author
author2 Lomônaco, José Fernando Bitencourt
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Cleuza Beatriz Baptista da
Lomônaco, José Fernando Bitencourt
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Teste de provérbios
Desenvolvimento cognitivo
Pensamento concreto e abstrato
Proverbs test
Cognitive development
Concrete and abstract thinking
topic Teste de provérbios
Desenvolvimento cognitivo
Pensamento concreto e abstrato
Proverbs test
Cognitive development
Concrete and abstract thinking
description An instrumentto evaluate concrete and abstract types of thinking was constructed and validated. The conducted as follows. 1) Selection of 104 proverbs commonly used in Brazil. 2) Evaluation of the familiarity and intelligibilityof the proverbs'words by a group of children. Proverbs not easily understood were excluded. 3) Evaluation of the proverbs'familiarity by ten adult judges. 4) Content validity of the instrument - three options of answer were defined for each proverb:concrete, abstract and irrelevant. Five judges evaluated these options as indicative of concrete or abstract thinking, or as notbeing related to the meaning of the proverbs. Only those alternatives with a high degree of agreement among the judges wereaccepted. 5) Analysis of the discriminam power and reliability - the instrument was administered to 195 children and teenagersbetween 8 and 15 years old. The statistical analysis revealed an instrument with high discriminant power and reliability.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-09-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17215
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17215
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17215/15684
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17215/15706
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 11 No. 1 (1995): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (1995): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 11 No. 1 (1995): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 11 n. 1 (1995): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa
1806-3446
0102-3772
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaptp@gmail.com
_version_ 1800211711226019840

Registros relacionados