Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Veiga, Itamar Soares
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Zevallos , Verónica Pilar Gomezjurado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Profanações
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973
Resumo: This article deals with the concept of signature as it is understood in Derrida and Agamben. In this context, an attempt is made to answer what are the internal displacements that the concept of signature has in both. The starting point of the two philosophers is the criticism of the traditional understanding of the concept of sign and the arrival point is to propose an alternative for a new understanding. Agamben will converge to a philosophical archeology, inspired by Foucault. Derrida will elaborate a complex conception of “writing” that marks a “non-presence” that will manifest itself under the concept of signature, avoiding the fixation of the relationship between meaning and signifier through an incessant différance. The answer points to a different way of valuing the signature: in Agamben the signature determines the episteme and, for Derrida, the complex concept of writing assumes more importance, because in it resides what will become a signature. Key-Words: Agamben; Derrida; signature; episteme; philosophical archaeology.
id UNC-0_69218e65d905b6c93a6146f54ed14deb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4973
network_acronym_str UNC-0
network_name_str Profanações
repository_id_str
spelling Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and AgambenOs deslocamentos no conceito de assinatura em Derrida e AgambenThis article deals with the concept of signature as it is understood in Derrida and Agamben. In this context, an attempt is made to answer what are the internal displacements that the concept of signature has in both. The starting point of the two philosophers is the criticism of the traditional understanding of the concept of sign and the arrival point is to propose an alternative for a new understanding. Agamben will converge to a philosophical archeology, inspired by Foucault. Derrida will elaborate a complex conception of “writing” that marks a “non-presence” that will manifest itself under the concept of signature, avoiding the fixation of the relationship between meaning and signifier through an incessant différance. The answer points to a different way of valuing the signature: in Agamben the signature determines the episteme and, for Derrida, the complex concept of writing assumes more importance, because in it resides what will become a signature. Key-Words: Agamben; Derrida; signature; episteme; philosophical archaeology.Este artigo trata sobre o conceito de assinatura tal como é compreendido em Derrida e Agamben. Neste contexto se procura responder quais são os deslocamentos internos que o conceito de assinatura possui em ambos. O ponto de partida dos dois filósofos é a crítica à compreensão tradicional do conceito de signo e o ponto de chegada é propor uma alternativa para uma nova compreensão. Agamben convergirá para uma arqueologia filosófica, inspirado por Foucault e, Derrida elaborará uma complexa concepção de “escrita” que assinala uma “não presença” a qual se manifestará sob o conceito de assinatura, evitando a fixação da relação entre significado e significante por meio de uma incessante différance. A resposta aponta para uma forma diferente de valorizar a assinatura: em Agamben ela determina a episteme e, para Derrida, o complexo conceito de escrita assume mais importância, porque nela reside o que irá se tornar uma assinatura. Palavras-chave: Agamben; Derrida; assinatura; episteme; arqueologia filosófica.Universidade do Contestado (UnC)2023-11-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/497310.24302/prof.v10.4973Profanações; v. 10 (2023); 619-6432358-612510.24302/prof.v10.reponame:Profanaçõesinstname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC)instacron:UNCporhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973/2072Copyright (c) 2023 Profanaçõeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeiga, Itamar SoaresZevallos , Verónica Pilar Gomezjurado2023-12-15T23:10:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4973Revistahttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/PRIhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/oai||sandro@unc.br2358-61252358-6125opendoar:2023-12-15T23:10:30Profanações - Universidade do Contestado (UNC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben
Os deslocamentos no conceito de assinatura em Derrida e Agamben
title Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben
spellingShingle Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben
Veiga, Itamar Soares
title_short Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben
title_full Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben
title_fullStr Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben
title_full_unstemmed Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben
title_sort Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben
author Veiga, Itamar Soares
author_facet Veiga, Itamar Soares
Zevallos , Verónica Pilar Gomezjurado
author_role author
author2 Zevallos , Verónica Pilar Gomezjurado
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Veiga, Itamar Soares
Zevallos , Verónica Pilar Gomezjurado
description This article deals with the concept of signature as it is understood in Derrida and Agamben. In this context, an attempt is made to answer what are the internal displacements that the concept of signature has in both. The starting point of the two philosophers is the criticism of the traditional understanding of the concept of sign and the arrival point is to propose an alternative for a new understanding. Agamben will converge to a philosophical archeology, inspired by Foucault. Derrida will elaborate a complex conception of “writing” that marks a “non-presence” that will manifest itself under the concept of signature, avoiding the fixation of the relationship between meaning and signifier through an incessant différance. The answer points to a different way of valuing the signature: in Agamben the signature determines the episteme and, for Derrida, the complex concept of writing assumes more importance, because in it resides what will become a signature. Key-Words: Agamben; Derrida; signature; episteme; philosophical archaeology.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973
10.24302/prof.v10.4973
url http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973
identifier_str_mv 10.24302/prof.v10.4973
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973/2072
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Profanações
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Profanações
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Contestado (UnC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Contestado (UnC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Profanações; v. 10 (2023); 619-643
2358-6125
10.24302/prof.v10.
reponame:Profanações
instname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
instacron:UNC
instname_str Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
instacron_str UNC
institution UNC
reponame_str Profanações
collection Profanações
repository.name.fl_str_mv Profanações - Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sandro@unc.br
_version_ 1797688249131466752