Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Profanações |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973 |
Resumo: | This article deals with the concept of signature as it is understood in Derrida and Agamben. In this context, an attempt is made to answer what are the internal displacements that the concept of signature has in both. The starting point of the two philosophers is the criticism of the traditional understanding of the concept of sign and the arrival point is to propose an alternative for a new understanding. Agamben will converge to a philosophical archeology, inspired by Foucault. Derrida will elaborate a complex conception of “writing” that marks a “non-presence” that will manifest itself under the concept of signature, avoiding the fixation of the relationship between meaning and signifier through an incessant différance. The answer points to a different way of valuing the signature: in Agamben the signature determines the episteme and, for Derrida, the complex concept of writing assumes more importance, because in it resides what will become a signature. Key-Words: Agamben; Derrida; signature; episteme; philosophical archaeology. |
id |
UNC-0_69218e65d905b6c93a6146f54ed14deb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4973 |
network_acronym_str |
UNC-0 |
network_name_str |
Profanações |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and AgambenOs deslocamentos no conceito de assinatura em Derrida e AgambenThis article deals with the concept of signature as it is understood in Derrida and Agamben. In this context, an attempt is made to answer what are the internal displacements that the concept of signature has in both. The starting point of the two philosophers is the criticism of the traditional understanding of the concept of sign and the arrival point is to propose an alternative for a new understanding. Agamben will converge to a philosophical archeology, inspired by Foucault. Derrida will elaborate a complex conception of “writing” that marks a “non-presence” that will manifest itself under the concept of signature, avoiding the fixation of the relationship between meaning and signifier through an incessant différance. The answer points to a different way of valuing the signature: in Agamben the signature determines the episteme and, for Derrida, the complex concept of writing assumes more importance, because in it resides what will become a signature. Key-Words: Agamben; Derrida; signature; episteme; philosophical archaeology.Este artigo trata sobre o conceito de assinatura tal como é compreendido em Derrida e Agamben. Neste contexto se procura responder quais são os deslocamentos internos que o conceito de assinatura possui em ambos. O ponto de partida dos dois filósofos é a crítica à compreensão tradicional do conceito de signo e o ponto de chegada é propor uma alternativa para uma nova compreensão. Agamben convergirá para uma arqueologia filosófica, inspirado por Foucault e, Derrida elaborará uma complexa concepção de “escrita” que assinala uma “não presença” a qual se manifestará sob o conceito de assinatura, evitando a fixação da relação entre significado e significante por meio de uma incessante différance. A resposta aponta para uma forma diferente de valorizar a assinatura: em Agamben ela determina a episteme e, para Derrida, o complexo conceito de escrita assume mais importância, porque nela reside o que irá se tornar uma assinatura. Palavras-chave: Agamben; Derrida; assinatura; episteme; arqueologia filosófica.Universidade do Contestado (UnC)2023-11-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/497310.24302/prof.v10.4973Profanações; v. 10 (2023); 619-6432358-612510.24302/prof.v10.reponame:Profanaçõesinstname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC)instacron:UNCporhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973/2072Copyright (c) 2023 Profanaçõeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeiga, Itamar SoaresZevallos , Verónica Pilar Gomezjurado2023-12-15T23:10:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4973Revistahttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/PRIhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/oai||sandro@unc.br2358-61252358-6125opendoar:2023-12-15T23:10:30Profanações - Universidade do Contestado (UNC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben Os deslocamentos no conceito de assinatura em Derrida e Agamben |
title |
Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben |
spellingShingle |
Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben Veiga, Itamar Soares |
title_short |
Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben |
title_full |
Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben |
title_fullStr |
Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben |
title_full_unstemmed |
Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben |
title_sort |
Displacements in the concept of signature in Derrida and Agamben |
author |
Veiga, Itamar Soares |
author_facet |
Veiga, Itamar Soares Zevallos , Verónica Pilar Gomezjurado |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zevallos , Verónica Pilar Gomezjurado |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Veiga, Itamar Soares Zevallos , Verónica Pilar Gomezjurado |
description |
This article deals with the concept of signature as it is understood in Derrida and Agamben. In this context, an attempt is made to answer what are the internal displacements that the concept of signature has in both. The starting point of the two philosophers is the criticism of the traditional understanding of the concept of sign and the arrival point is to propose an alternative for a new understanding. Agamben will converge to a philosophical archeology, inspired by Foucault. Derrida will elaborate a complex conception of “writing” that marks a “non-presence” that will manifest itself under the concept of signature, avoiding the fixation of the relationship between meaning and signifier through an incessant différance. The answer points to a different way of valuing the signature: in Agamben the signature determines the episteme and, for Derrida, the complex concept of writing assumes more importance, because in it resides what will become a signature. Key-Words: Agamben; Derrida; signature; episteme; philosophical archaeology. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973 10.24302/prof.v10.4973 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24302/prof.v10.4973 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/4973/2072 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Profanações https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Profanações https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Contestado (UnC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Contestado (UnC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Profanações; v. 10 (2023); 619-643 2358-6125 10.24302/prof.v10. reponame:Profanações instname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC) instacron:UNC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Contestado (UNC) |
instacron_str |
UNC |
institution |
UNC |
reponame_str |
Profanações |
collection |
Profanações |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Profanações - Universidade do Contestado (UNC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sandro@unc.br |
_version_ |
1797688249131466752 |