Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-91992010000300007 |
Resumo: | Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is endemic in numerous Brazilian regions. The greatest difficulty in controlling the disease is the diagnostic limitation. In the present study, the most common tests employed for visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis were compared: immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA), direct parasitological examination and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Samples of lymph node aspirates and blood were collected from 100 dogs that lived in an endemic area (Bauru city, São Paulo state) and from 100 negative controls from a non-endemic area (Botucatu city, São Paulo state). Specificity of both IFAT and PCR was 100% whereas ELISA was 99%. Sensitivities were 97.77, 93.33 and 91.11% respectively for IFAT, ELISA and PCR. |
id |
UNESP-11_512bae37d05f040735d305a2dc0351c9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1678-91992010000300007 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-11 |
network_name_str |
The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosisvisceral leishmaniasisdogdiagnosisCanine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is endemic in numerous Brazilian regions. The greatest difficulty in controlling the disease is the diagnostic limitation. In the present study, the most common tests employed for visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis were compared: immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA), direct parasitological examination and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Samples of lymph node aspirates and blood were collected from 100 dogs that lived in an endemic area (Bauru city, São Paulo state) and from 100 negative controls from a non-endemic area (Botucatu city, São Paulo state). Specificity of both IFAT and PCR was 100% whereas ELISA was 99%. Sensitivities were 97.77, 93.33 and 91.11% respectively for IFAT, ELISA and PCR.Centro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP/UNESP)2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-91992010000300007Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases v.16 n.3 2010reponame:The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP10.1590/S1678-91992010000300007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamargo,JBLangoni,HTroncarelli,MZMachado,JGLucheis,SBPadovani,CReng2010-08-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-91992010000300007Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jvatitdPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editorial@jvat.org.br1678-91991678-9180opendoar:2010-08-30T00:00The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis |
title |
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis |
spellingShingle |
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis Camargo,JB visceral leishmaniasis dog diagnosis |
title_short |
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis |
title_full |
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis |
title_fullStr |
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis |
title_sort |
Performance of IFAT, ELISA, direct parasitological examination and PCR on lymph node aspirates for canine visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis |
author |
Camargo,JB |
author_facet |
Camargo,JB Langoni,H Troncarelli,MZ Machado,JG Lucheis,SB Padovani,CR |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Langoni,H Troncarelli,MZ Machado,JG Lucheis,SB Padovani,CR |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camargo,JB Langoni,H Troncarelli,MZ Machado,JG Lucheis,SB Padovani,CR |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
visceral leishmaniasis dog diagnosis |
topic |
visceral leishmaniasis dog diagnosis |
description |
Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is endemic in numerous Brazilian regions. The greatest difficulty in controlling the disease is the diagnostic limitation. In the present study, the most common tests employed for visceral leishmaniasis diagnosis were compared: immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT), immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA), direct parasitological examination and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Samples of lymph node aspirates and blood were collected from 100 dogs that lived in an endemic area (Bauru city, São Paulo state) and from 100 negative controls from a non-endemic area (Botucatu city, São Paulo state). Specificity of both IFAT and PCR was 100% whereas ELISA was 99%. Sensitivities were 97.77, 93.33 and 91.11% respectively for IFAT, ELISA and PCR. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-91992010000300007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-91992010000300007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-91992010000300007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP/UNESP) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos de Venenos e Animais Peçonhentos (CEVAP/UNESP) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases v.16 n.3 2010 reponame:The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases (Online) |
collection |
The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editorial@jvat.org.br |
_version_ |
1748958538773823488 |