Ideology, political sophistication and vote in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Izumi, Mauricio Yoshida
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Opinião Pública (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8656282
Resumo: The spatial theory of voting assumes that voters will cast their votes for the candidate whose policy position is closest to their own views. The goal of this paper is twofold: the first one is to test this assumption for the Brazilian presidential elections from 2002 to 2014. In order to do that we use data from the Brazilian Electoral Study along with scaling methods. The results suggest that the probability of a voter casting her vote for the candidate whose policy position is closest to her own is pretty high. The second goal of this paper is to assess if this result holds despite voters’ political sophistication. In other words, we test if ill-informed voters make their electoral decisions based on non-spatial candidate characteristics. The results contradict this idea. Politically ill-informed voters also choose the candidates whose views are closer to their own.
id UNICAMP-10_f3f02c673debce82c6a05d2e701672b9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656282
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-10
network_name_str Opinião Pública (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ideology, political sophistication and vote in BrazilIdeologia, sofisticação política e voto no BrasilElectionsIdeologyPolitical sophisticationSpatial theory of the voteEleiçõesIdeologiaSofisticação políticaTeoria espacial do votoThe spatial theory of voting assumes that voters will cast their votes for the candidate whose policy position is closest to their own views. The goal of this paper is twofold: the first one is to test this assumption for the Brazilian presidential elections from 2002 to 2014. In order to do that we use data from the Brazilian Electoral Study along with scaling methods. The results suggest that the probability of a voter casting her vote for the candidate whose policy position is closest to her own is pretty high. The second goal of this paper is to assess if this result holds despite voters’ political sophistication. In other words, we test if ill-informed voters make their electoral decisions based on non-spatial candidate characteristics. The results contradict this idea. Politically ill-informed voters also choose the candidates whose views are closer to their own.A teoria espacial do voto parte do pressuposto de que eleitores diante de dois ou mais candidatos escolherão aquele que estiver mais próximo de suas preferências. O primeiro objetivo deste artigo é testar esse pressuposto para as eleições presidenciais no Brasil entre 2002 e 2014. Para isso utilizamos os dados do Estudo Eleitoral Brasileiro e as técnicas de escalonamento. Os resultados apontam que a probabilidade de um eleitor votar no candidato que está mais próximo dele do ponto de vista ideológico é extremamente alta. O segundo objetivo do artigo é verificar se esse resultado se sustenta a despeito do nível de sofisticação política do eleitor. Isto é, testamos a hipótese de que eleitores pouco informados tomariam as suas decisões a partir de elementos não espaciais (não ideológicos). Os resultados contrariam essa ideia. Eleitores pouco sofisticados do ponto de vista político também escolhem os candidatos que estão mais próximos deles.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2019-08-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8656282Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2019): jan./abr.; 29-62Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2019): jan./abr.; 29-62Opinião Pública; v. 25 n. 1 (2019): jan./abr.; 29-621807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8656282/21147Brazil;2019Brasil; 2019Izumi, Mauricio Yoshida info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-08-26T14:08:18Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656282Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2019-08-26T14:08:18Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ideology, political sophistication and vote in Brazil
Ideologia, sofisticação política e voto no Brasil
title Ideology, political sophistication and vote in Brazil
spellingShingle Ideology, political sophistication and vote in Brazil
Izumi, Mauricio Yoshida
Elections
Ideology
Political sophistication
Spatial theory of the vote
Eleições
Ideologia
Sofisticação política
Teoria espacial do voto
title_short Ideology, political sophistication and vote in Brazil
title_full Ideology, political sophistication and vote in Brazil
title_fullStr Ideology, political sophistication and vote in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Ideology, political sophistication and vote in Brazil
title_sort Ideology, political sophistication and vote in Brazil
author Izumi, Mauricio Yoshida
author_facet Izumi, Mauricio Yoshida
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Izumi, Mauricio Yoshida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Elections
Ideology
Political sophistication
Spatial theory of the vote
Eleições
Ideologia
Sofisticação política
Teoria espacial do voto
topic Elections
Ideology
Political sophistication
Spatial theory of the vote
Eleições
Ideologia
Sofisticação política
Teoria espacial do voto
description The spatial theory of voting assumes that voters will cast their votes for the candidate whose policy position is closest to their own views. The goal of this paper is twofold: the first one is to test this assumption for the Brazilian presidential elections from 2002 to 2014. In order to do that we use data from the Brazilian Electoral Study along with scaling methods. The results suggest that the probability of a voter casting her vote for the candidate whose policy position is closest to her own is pretty high. The second goal of this paper is to assess if this result holds despite voters’ political sophistication. In other words, we test if ill-informed voters make their electoral decisions based on non-spatial candidate characteristics. The results contradict this idea. Politically ill-informed voters also choose the candidates whose views are closer to their own.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8656282
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8656282
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8656282/21147
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil;2019
Brasil; 2019
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2019): jan./abr.; 29-62
Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2019): jan./abr.; 29-62
Opinião Pública; v. 25 n. 1 (2019): jan./abr.; 29-62
1807-0191
reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Opinião Pública (Online)
collection Opinião Pública (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br
_version_ 1800217018036649984