Theories of labor market segmentation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neffa, Julio César
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho
Texto Completo: https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/18343
Resumo: The article reviews the main versions of the theories of labor market segmentation developed in the 20th century, which are still valid. Originally they focused on showing the inadequacies of neoclassical theories according to which the agents operating in the market are homogeneous and the barriers to mobility come partly from the existing technical limitations to substitute labor for capital and to replace workers with different professional qualifications. Segmentation would then be produced by the temporary imperfection of the markets, without assigning responsibilities to the companies who generate the differentiation between internal and external, primary and secondary markets, to prevent profit rates from falling. The authors of these theories wrote when the Keynesian-Fordist mode of development was in force (1945-1974), but nowadays the precariousness of employment and the diversification of specific or particular forms of employment have given them new validity. Among the causes highlighted is the importance of institutions, employment policies and flexibilizing labor legislation.
id UNICAMP-22_87624ddbc9aaa56f4d551987dc8fe18a
oai_identifier_str oai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/18343
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-22
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho
repository_id_str
spelling Theories of labor market segmentationTeorías de la segmentación del mercado de trabajoThéories de la segmentation du marché du travailTeorias da segmentação do mercado de trabalhoLabor market theoriesWorkforce segmentationPrecarization of employmentThéories du marché du travailSegmentation de la main-d'œuvrePrécarisation de l'emploiTeorías del mercado laboralSegmentación de la fuerza de trabajoPrecarización del empleoTeorias do mercado de trabalhoSegmentação da força de trabalhoPrecarização do empregoThe article reviews the main versions of the theories of labor market segmentation developed in the 20th century, which are still valid. Originally they focused on showing the inadequacies of neoclassical theories according to which the agents operating in the market are homogeneous and the barriers to mobility come partly from the existing technical limitations to substitute labor for capital and to replace workers with different professional qualifications. Segmentation would then be produced by the temporary imperfection of the markets, without assigning responsibilities to the companies who generate the differentiation between internal and external, primary and secondary markets, to prevent profit rates from falling. The authors of these theories wrote when the Keynesian-Fordist mode of development was in force (1945-1974), but nowadays the precariousness of employment and the diversification of specific or particular forms of employment have given them new validity. Among the causes highlighted is the importance of institutions, employment policies and flexibilizing labor legislation.El artículo se propone pasar en revista las principales versiones de las teorías de la segmentación de los mercados de trabajo gestadas en el siglo XX y que siguen teniendo vigencia. En su origen se enfocaron en mostrar las insuficiencias de las teorías neoclásicas según las cuales los agentes que operan en el mercado son homogéneos y las barreras a la movilidad provienen en parte de las limitaciones técnicas existentes para sustituir trabajo por capital y reemplazar a trabajadores con diferentes calificaciones profesionales. La segmentación seria producida entonces por la imperfección temporaria de los mercados, sin asignar responsabili-dades a los empresarios que generan la diferenciación entre mercados internos y externos, primarios y secundarios, para evitar que caigan las tasas de ganancia. Los autores de estas teorías escribieron cuando estaba vigente el modo de desarrollo keynesiano-fordista (1945-1974), pero hoy en día la precarización del empleo y la diversificación de las formas especificas o particulares de empleo le han dado actualidad. Entre las causas señaladas figura la importancia de las instituciones, de las políticas de empleo y de la legislación del trabajo flexibilizadora.L'article passe en revue les principales versions de la théorie de la segmentation du marché du travail formulées au 20e siècle, qui sont toujours valables. À l'origine, elles s'attachaient à montrer les insuffisances des théories néoclassiques, selon lesquelles les agents opérant sur le marché sont homogènes et les barrières à la mobilité proviennent, en partie, des limitations techniques existantes pour substituer le travail au capital et pour substituer des travailleurs ayant des qualifications professionnelles différentes. La segmentation serait alors produite par l'imperfection temporaire des marchés, sans attribuer de responsabilité aux entreprises qui génèrent la différenciation entre marchés internes et externes, primaires et secondaires, pour éviter la baisse des taux de profit. Les auteurs de ces théories écrivaient à une époque où le mode de développement fordiste-keynésien était en vigueur (1945-1974), mais aujourd'hui la précarité de l'emploi et la diversification des formes d'emploi spécifiques ou particulières leur ont donné une nouvelle validité. Parmi les causes mises en évidence, l'importance des institutions, des politiques de l'emploi et de la flexibilisation de la législation du travail.O artigo revisa as principais versões da teoria da segmentação do mercado de trabalho formuladas no século XX e que permanecem tendo vigência. Originalmente, elas se concentravam em mostrar as inadequações das teorias neoclássicas, segundo as quais os agentes que operam no mercado são homogêneos e as barreiras à mobilidade provêm, em parte, das limitações técnicas existentes para substituir o trabalho pelo capital e para substituir trabalhadores com diferentes qualificações profissionais. Então, a segmentação seria produzida pela imperfeição temporária dos mercados, sem atribuir responsabilidades às empresas que geram a diferenciação entre os mercados interno e externo, primário e secundário, para evitar a queda das taxas de lucro. Os autores dessas teorias escreveram na época em que vigorava o modo de desenvolvimento fordista-keynesiano (1945-1974), mas atualmente a precariedade do emprego e a diversificação de formas específicas ou particulares de emprego deram a elas nova validade. Entre as causas assinaladas destaca-se a importância das instituições, das políticas de emprego e da flexibilização da legislação trabalhista.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2023-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoTexteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/1834310.20396/rbest.v5i00.18343RBEST Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; v. 5 (2023): Dossiê: Diversidade dos mercados de trabalho no Brasil; e023012Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 5 (2023): Dossier: Diversidad de los mercados de trabajo en Brasil; e023012RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 5 (2023): Dossier: Diversity of labour markets in Brazil; e023012RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 5 (2023): Dossier: Diversité des marchés du travail au Brésil; e0230122674-9564reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalhoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)instacron:UNICAMPspaporhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/18343/12935https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/18343/12936Global; ContemporaryGlobal; ContemporáneoMondial; ContemporainGlobal; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2023 Julio César Neffahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeffa, Julio César2023-09-18T16:10:11Zoai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/18343Revistahttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/indexPUBhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/oairbest@unicamp.br || ppec@unicamp.br2674-95642674-9564opendoar:2023-09-18T16:10:11Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Theories of labor market segmentation
Teorías de la segmentación del mercado de trabajo
Théories de la segmentation du marché du travail
Teorias da segmentação do mercado de trabalho
title Theories of labor market segmentation
spellingShingle Theories of labor market segmentation
Neffa, Julio César
Labor market theories
Workforce segmentation
Precarization of employment
Théories du marché du travail
Segmentation de la main-d'œuvre
Précarisation de l'emploi
Teorías del mercado laboral
Segmentación de la fuerza de trabajo
Precarización del empleo
Teorias do mercado de trabalho
Segmentação da força de trabalho
Precarização do emprego
title_short Theories of labor market segmentation
title_full Theories of labor market segmentation
title_fullStr Theories of labor market segmentation
title_full_unstemmed Theories of labor market segmentation
title_sort Theories of labor market segmentation
author Neffa, Julio César
author_facet Neffa, Julio César
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neffa, Julio César
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Labor market theories
Workforce segmentation
Precarization of employment
Théories du marché du travail
Segmentation de la main-d'œuvre
Précarisation de l'emploi
Teorías del mercado laboral
Segmentación de la fuerza de trabajo
Precarización del empleo
Teorias do mercado de trabalho
Segmentação da força de trabalho
Precarização do emprego
topic Labor market theories
Workforce segmentation
Precarization of employment
Théories du marché du travail
Segmentation de la main-d'œuvre
Précarisation de l'emploi
Teorías del mercado laboral
Segmentación de la fuerza de trabajo
Precarización del empleo
Teorias do mercado de trabalho
Segmentação da força de trabalho
Precarização do emprego
description The article reviews the main versions of the theories of labor market segmentation developed in the 20th century, which are still valid. Originally they focused on showing the inadequacies of neoclassical theories according to which the agents operating in the market are homogeneous and the barriers to mobility come partly from the existing technical limitations to substitute labor for capital and to replace workers with different professional qualifications. Segmentation would then be produced by the temporary imperfection of the markets, without assigning responsibilities to the companies who generate the differentiation between internal and external, primary and secondary markets, to prevent profit rates from falling. The authors of these theories wrote when the Keynesian-Fordist mode of development was in force (1945-1974), but nowadays the precariousness of employment and the diversification of specific or particular forms of employment have given them new validity. Among the causes highlighted is the importance of institutions, employment policies and flexibilizing labor legislation.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
Texte
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/18343
10.20396/rbest.v5i00.18343
url https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/18343
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/rbest.v5i00.18343
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
por
language spa
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/18343/12935
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/18343/12936
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Julio César Neffa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Julio César Neffa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Global; Contemporary
Global; Contemporáneo
Mondial; Contemporain
Global; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RBEST Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; v. 5 (2023): Dossiê: Diversidade dos mercados de trabalho no Brasil; e023012
Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 5 (2023): Dossier: Diversidad de los mercados de trabajo en Brasil; e023012
RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 5 (2023): Dossier: Diversity of labour markets in Brazil; e023012
RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 5 (2023): Dossier: Diversité des marchés du travail au Brésil; e023012
2674-9564
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho
collection Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbest@unicamp.br || ppec@unicamp.br
_version_ 1797049011907067904

Registros relacionados