Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Grunevald, Matheus
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Cantarelli, Rômulo, Oballe , Harry Juan Rivera, Negrini, Thais de Cássia, Arthur, Rodrigo Alex, Silva , Eduardo Liberato da, Herpich, Tiago Luis, Muniz, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8663867
Resumo: Aim: This study aimed to compare the microbiological potential and gustatory perception of essential oils (EO) mouthrinses containing and not containing alcohol. Methods: Twenty healthy adult volunteers rinsed with 10mL of the following test solutions: EO with alcohol, EO without alcohol, or a control solution (saline solution with mint essence). A washout period of at least seven days was adopted after a single-use protocol of the respective solution. All participants used all three tested substances. Antimicrobial potential was assessed by counting salivary total viable bacteria both before and after each rinse. Gustatory perception was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Multiple comparisons were performed with the Wilcoxon test, using Bonferroni correction. Results: Both EO solutions presented a higher antimicrobial potential in comparison to the control solution (p<0.017). However, no significant difference in antimicrobial potential was observed between EO containing or not containing alcohol (p=0.218). VAS of EO with alcohol (median: 2.7) was similar to control solution (median: 1.6) (p=0.287). A better gustatory perception was observed of the EO without alcohol (median 7.6) when compared to the control solution (p<0.0001). When EO groups were compared, EO without alcohol also demonstrated a significantly better gustatory perception (p=0.001). Conclusion: Mouthrinse containing EO without alcohol presented a better taste perception when compared to the EO with alcohol, but no difference was observed in the antimicrobial potential of both EO solutions after a single rinse protocol.
id UNICAMP-8_01ed3652f53ecb0f0cc3d9a19df06e96
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8663867
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trialAlcoholsOils volatileBacteriaMouthwashesTaste perceptionAim: This study aimed to compare the microbiological potential and gustatory perception of essential oils (EO) mouthrinses containing and not containing alcohol. Methods: Twenty healthy adult volunteers rinsed with 10mL of the following test solutions: EO with alcohol, EO without alcohol, or a control solution (saline solution with mint essence). A washout period of at least seven days was adopted after a single-use protocol of the respective solution. All participants used all three tested substances. Antimicrobial potential was assessed by counting salivary total viable bacteria both before and after each rinse. Gustatory perception was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Multiple comparisons were performed with the Wilcoxon test, using Bonferroni correction. Results: Both EO solutions presented a higher antimicrobial potential in comparison to the control solution (p<0.017). However, no significant difference in antimicrobial potential was observed between EO containing or not containing alcohol (p=0.218). VAS of EO with alcohol (median: 2.7) was similar to control solution (median: 1.6) (p=0.287). A better gustatory perception was observed of the EO without alcohol (median 7.6) when compared to the control solution (p<0.0001). When EO groups were compared, EO without alcohol also demonstrated a significantly better gustatory perception (p=0.001). Conclusion: Mouthrinse containing EO without alcohol presented a better taste perception when compared to the EO with alcohol, but no difference was observed in the antimicrobial potential of both EO solutions after a single rinse protocol.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/866386710.20396/bjos.v20i00.8663867Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e213867Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e2138671677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8663867/26505Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrunevald, MatheusCantarelli, RômuloOballe , Harry Juan Rivera Negrini, Thais de Cássia Arthur, Rodrigo AlexSilva , Eduardo Liberato da Herpich, Tiago Luis Muniz, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes 2021-04-16T21:59:54Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8663867Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-04-16T21:59:54Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trial
title Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trial
Grunevald, Matheus
Alcohols
Oils volatile
Bacteria
Mouthwashes
Taste perception
title_short Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort Antimicrobial potential of essential oils mouthrinses with and without alcohol: a randomized clinical trial
author Grunevald, Matheus
author_facet Grunevald, Matheus
Cantarelli, Rômulo
Oballe , Harry Juan Rivera
Negrini, Thais de Cássia
Arthur, Rodrigo Alex
Silva , Eduardo Liberato da
Herpich, Tiago Luis
Muniz, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes
author_role author
author2 Cantarelli, Rômulo
Oballe , Harry Juan Rivera
Negrini, Thais de Cássia
Arthur, Rodrigo Alex
Silva , Eduardo Liberato da
Herpich, Tiago Luis
Muniz, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Grunevald, Matheus
Cantarelli, Rômulo
Oballe , Harry Juan Rivera
Negrini, Thais de Cássia
Arthur, Rodrigo Alex
Silva , Eduardo Liberato da
Herpich, Tiago Luis
Muniz, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alcohols
Oils volatile
Bacteria
Mouthwashes
Taste perception
topic Alcohols
Oils volatile
Bacteria
Mouthwashes
Taste perception
description Aim: This study aimed to compare the microbiological potential and gustatory perception of essential oils (EO) mouthrinses containing and not containing alcohol. Methods: Twenty healthy adult volunteers rinsed with 10mL of the following test solutions: EO with alcohol, EO without alcohol, or a control solution (saline solution with mint essence). A washout period of at least seven days was adopted after a single-use protocol of the respective solution. All participants used all three tested substances. Antimicrobial potential was assessed by counting salivary total viable bacteria both before and after each rinse. Gustatory perception was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Multiple comparisons were performed with the Wilcoxon test, using Bonferroni correction. Results: Both EO solutions presented a higher antimicrobial potential in comparison to the control solution (p<0.017). However, no significant difference in antimicrobial potential was observed between EO containing or not containing alcohol (p=0.218). VAS of EO with alcohol (median: 2.7) was similar to control solution (median: 1.6) (p=0.287). A better gustatory perception was observed of the EO without alcohol (median 7.6) when compared to the control solution (p<0.0001). When EO groups were compared, EO without alcohol also demonstrated a significantly better gustatory perception (p=0.001). Conclusion: Mouthrinse containing EO without alcohol presented a better taste perception when compared to the EO with alcohol, but no difference was observed in the antimicrobial potential of both EO solutions after a single rinse protocol.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8663867
10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8663867
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8663867
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8663867
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8663867/26505
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporany
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e213867
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e213867
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216397625688064