Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Baptista Rosa, Letícia Carla
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548
Resumo: Ethics is the science of human behavior in society. Ethical discussions are daily inserted within a new social dimension, such as abortion and embryo reduction. Abortion is the interruption of pregnancy spontaneously or intentionally, resulting in the death of the still-to-be-born child. The Brazilian Federal Constitution and Civil Law guarantee the right to life from conception and provides the right of personality to the born child. However, the juridical ordering does not pinpoint the time of the start of life. The right to life is bonded to the principle of the human person from whom all other rights derive. These rights comprise freedom, family constitution and other. The right to life is not absolute since the lawmaker attributes differentiated tutelages to the still-to-be-born child and to the person, even permitting abortion on conditions foreseen by Penal Law. Embryo reduction is a procedure by which the number of fetuses in a multiple pregnancy is diminished so that complications could be avoided at the mother’s convenience or on medical advice. The Brazilian Federal Medical Council does not allow this practice even though it is a common occurrence, without any practical control, boiling down to the same effects of abortion. It should be emphasized that when multiple pregnancy puts the mother in danger, the procedure is a necessary abortion. However, the regulation of assisted human reproduction techniques is mandatory so that the ethical and juridical relativism in its procedures could be diminished or extinguished.
id UNICESU-0_242a92a44cbf5d08911a5385e73a89d9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2548
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo ReductionDo Relativismo Ético e Jurídico do Aborto quando da Realização da Redução EmbrionáriaAbortionRight to LifeFemale AutonomyDisposition of One’s Own BodyEmbryo ReductionAbortoDireito à VidaAutonomia da MulherDisposição do Próprio CorpoRedução EmbrionáriaEthics is the science of human behavior in society. Ethical discussions are daily inserted within a new social dimension, such as abortion and embryo reduction. Abortion is the interruption of pregnancy spontaneously or intentionally, resulting in the death of the still-to-be-born child. The Brazilian Federal Constitution and Civil Law guarantee the right to life from conception and provides the right of personality to the born child. However, the juridical ordering does not pinpoint the time of the start of life. The right to life is bonded to the principle of the human person from whom all other rights derive. These rights comprise freedom, family constitution and other. The right to life is not absolute since the lawmaker attributes differentiated tutelages to the still-to-be-born child and to the person, even permitting abortion on conditions foreseen by Penal Law. Embryo reduction is a procedure by which the number of fetuses in a multiple pregnancy is diminished so that complications could be avoided at the mother’s convenience or on medical advice. The Brazilian Federal Medical Council does not allow this practice even though it is a common occurrence, without any practical control, boiling down to the same effects of abortion. It should be emphasized that when multiple pregnancy puts the mother in danger, the procedure is a necessary abortion. However, the regulation of assisted human reproduction techniques is mandatory so that the ethical and juridical relativism in its procedures could be diminished or extinguished.A ética pode ser considerada a ciência da conduta dos seres humanos em sociedade. Hodiernamente, as discussões éticas estão inseridas em uma nova dimensão social, como por exemplo, o aborto e a redução embrionária, dentre outras. O aborto consiste na interrupção da gravidez, de forma espontânea ou provocada, do qual resulta a morte do nascituro. A Constituição Federal e o Código Civil garantem o direito à vida desde a concepção, condicionando a aquisição dos direitos da personalidade ao nascimento com vida. No entanto, o ordenamento jurídico silenciou ao traçar em que momento tem início a vida. O direito à vida está atrelado ao princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana e dele decorrem o exercício dos demais direitos, tais como: a liberdade, o de constituir família, dentre outros. Tem-se que o direito à vida não é absoluto, porque o próprio legislador atribui tutelas diferenciadas ao nascituro e à pessoa, permitindo até mesmo a possibilidade de aborto nas causas legais previstas no Código Penal. Já a redução embrionária consiste no procedimento que tem o objetivo de diminuir o número de fetos nas gestações múltiplas, afastando assim as complicações, por simples conveniência da gestante ou por precaução médica. No Brasil essa prática não é permitida pelo Conselho Federal de Medicina, no entanto, vem ocorrendo sem qualquer controle, acarretando os mesmos efeitos do aborto. Ressalta-se que quando esta gravidez múltipla trouxer perigo de vida à gestante, o procedimento configurará aborto necessário. Portanto, é importante a regulamentação das técnicas de reprodução humana assistida no sentido de diminuir ou extinguir o relativismo ético e jurídico nos seus procedimentos.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2012-12-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 12 n. 2 (2012): jul./dez.2176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548/1755Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardin, Valéria Silva GaldinoBaptista Rosa, Letícia Carla2022-05-24T12:43:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2548Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-05-24T12:43:20Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction
Do Relativismo Ético e Jurídico do Aborto quando da Realização da Redução Embrionária
title Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction
spellingShingle Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction
Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino
Abortion
Right to Life
Female Autonomy
Disposition of One’s Own Body
Embryo Reduction
Aborto
Direito à Vida
Autonomia da Mulher
Disposição do Próprio Corpo
Redução Embrionária
title_short Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction
title_full Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction
title_fullStr Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction
title_full_unstemmed Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction
title_sort Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction
author Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino
author_facet Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino
Baptista Rosa, Letícia Carla
author_role author
author2 Baptista Rosa, Letícia Carla
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino
Baptista Rosa, Letícia Carla
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Abortion
Right to Life
Female Autonomy
Disposition of One’s Own Body
Embryo Reduction
Aborto
Direito à Vida
Autonomia da Mulher
Disposição do Próprio Corpo
Redução Embrionária
topic Abortion
Right to Life
Female Autonomy
Disposition of One’s Own Body
Embryo Reduction
Aborto
Direito à Vida
Autonomia da Mulher
Disposição do Próprio Corpo
Redução Embrionária
description Ethics is the science of human behavior in society. Ethical discussions are daily inserted within a new social dimension, such as abortion and embryo reduction. Abortion is the interruption of pregnancy spontaneously or intentionally, resulting in the death of the still-to-be-born child. The Brazilian Federal Constitution and Civil Law guarantee the right to life from conception and provides the right of personality to the born child. However, the juridical ordering does not pinpoint the time of the start of life. The right to life is bonded to the principle of the human person from whom all other rights derive. These rights comprise freedom, family constitution and other. The right to life is not absolute since the lawmaker attributes differentiated tutelages to the still-to-be-born child and to the person, even permitting abortion on conditions foreseen by Penal Law. Embryo reduction is a procedure by which the number of fetuses in a multiple pregnancy is diminished so that complications could be avoided at the mother’s convenience or on medical advice. The Brazilian Federal Medical Council does not allow this practice even though it is a common occurrence, without any practical control, boiling down to the same effects of abortion. It should be emphasized that when multiple pregnancy puts the mother in danger, the procedure is a necessary abortion. However, the regulation of assisted human reproduction techniques is mandatory so that the ethical and juridical relativism in its procedures could be diminished or extinguished.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548/1755
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 12 n. 2 (2012): jul./dez.
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042386807390208

Registros relacionados