Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548 |
Resumo: | Ethics is the science of human behavior in society. Ethical discussions are daily inserted within a new social dimension, such as abortion and embryo reduction. Abortion is the interruption of pregnancy spontaneously or intentionally, resulting in the death of the still-to-be-born child. The Brazilian Federal Constitution and Civil Law guarantee the right to life from conception and provides the right of personality to the born child. However, the juridical ordering does not pinpoint the time of the start of life. The right to life is bonded to the principle of the human person from whom all other rights derive. These rights comprise freedom, family constitution and other. The right to life is not absolute since the lawmaker attributes differentiated tutelages to the still-to-be-born child and to the person, even permitting abortion on conditions foreseen by Penal Law. Embryo reduction is a procedure by which the number of fetuses in a multiple pregnancy is diminished so that complications could be avoided at the mother’s convenience or on medical advice. The Brazilian Federal Medical Council does not allow this practice even though it is a common occurrence, without any practical control, boiling down to the same effects of abortion. It should be emphasized that when multiple pregnancy puts the mother in danger, the procedure is a necessary abortion. However, the regulation of assisted human reproduction techniques is mandatory so that the ethical and juridical relativism in its procedures could be diminished or extinguished. |
id |
UNICESU-0_242a92a44cbf5d08911a5385e73a89d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2548 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo ReductionDo Relativismo Ético e Jurídico do Aborto quando da Realização da Redução EmbrionáriaAbortionRight to LifeFemale AutonomyDisposition of One’s Own BodyEmbryo ReductionAbortoDireito à VidaAutonomia da MulherDisposição do Próprio CorpoRedução EmbrionáriaEthics is the science of human behavior in society. Ethical discussions are daily inserted within a new social dimension, such as abortion and embryo reduction. Abortion is the interruption of pregnancy spontaneously or intentionally, resulting in the death of the still-to-be-born child. The Brazilian Federal Constitution and Civil Law guarantee the right to life from conception and provides the right of personality to the born child. However, the juridical ordering does not pinpoint the time of the start of life. The right to life is bonded to the principle of the human person from whom all other rights derive. These rights comprise freedom, family constitution and other. The right to life is not absolute since the lawmaker attributes differentiated tutelages to the still-to-be-born child and to the person, even permitting abortion on conditions foreseen by Penal Law. Embryo reduction is a procedure by which the number of fetuses in a multiple pregnancy is diminished so that complications could be avoided at the mother’s convenience or on medical advice. The Brazilian Federal Medical Council does not allow this practice even though it is a common occurrence, without any practical control, boiling down to the same effects of abortion. It should be emphasized that when multiple pregnancy puts the mother in danger, the procedure is a necessary abortion. However, the regulation of assisted human reproduction techniques is mandatory so that the ethical and juridical relativism in its procedures could be diminished or extinguished.A ética pode ser considerada a ciência da conduta dos seres humanos em sociedade. Hodiernamente, as discussões éticas estão inseridas em uma nova dimensão social, como por exemplo, o aborto e a redução embrionária, dentre outras. O aborto consiste na interrupção da gravidez, de forma espontânea ou provocada, do qual resulta a morte do nascituro. A Constituição Federal e o Código Civil garantem o direito à vida desde a concepção, condicionando a aquisição dos direitos da personalidade ao nascimento com vida. No entanto, o ordenamento jurídico silenciou ao traçar em que momento tem início a vida. O direito à vida está atrelado ao princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana e dele decorrem o exercício dos demais direitos, tais como: a liberdade, o de constituir família, dentre outros. Tem-se que o direito à vida não é absoluto, porque o próprio legislador atribui tutelas diferenciadas ao nascituro e à pessoa, permitindo até mesmo a possibilidade de aborto nas causas legais previstas no Código Penal. Já a redução embrionária consiste no procedimento que tem o objetivo de diminuir o número de fetos nas gestações múltiplas, afastando assim as complicações, por simples conveniência da gestante ou por precaução médica. No Brasil essa prática não é permitida pelo Conselho Federal de Medicina, no entanto, vem ocorrendo sem qualquer controle, acarretando os mesmos efeitos do aborto. Ressalta-se que quando esta gravidez múltipla trouxer perigo de vida à gestante, o procedimento configurará aborto necessário. Portanto, é importante a regulamentação das técnicas de reprodução humana assistida no sentido de diminuir ou extinguir o relativismo ético e jurídico nos seus procedimentos.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2012-12-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 12 n. 2 (2012): jul./dez.2176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548/1755Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardin, Valéria Silva GaldinoBaptista Rosa, Letícia Carla2022-05-24T12:43:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2548Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-05-24T12:43:20Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction Do Relativismo Ético e Jurídico do Aborto quando da Realização da Redução Embrionária |
title |
Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction |
spellingShingle |
Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino Abortion Right to Life Female Autonomy Disposition of One’s Own Body Embryo Reduction Aborto Direito à Vida Autonomia da Mulher Disposição do Próprio Corpo Redução Embrionária |
title_short |
Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction |
title_full |
Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction |
title_fullStr |
Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction |
title_sort |
Ethical and Juridical Relativism of Abortion in Embryo Reduction |
author |
Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino |
author_facet |
Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino Baptista Rosa, Letícia Carla |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Baptista Rosa, Letícia Carla |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino Baptista Rosa, Letícia Carla |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Abortion Right to Life Female Autonomy Disposition of One’s Own Body Embryo Reduction Aborto Direito à Vida Autonomia da Mulher Disposição do Próprio Corpo Redução Embrionária |
topic |
Abortion Right to Life Female Autonomy Disposition of One’s Own Body Embryo Reduction Aborto Direito à Vida Autonomia da Mulher Disposição do Próprio Corpo Redução Embrionária |
description |
Ethics is the science of human behavior in society. Ethical discussions are daily inserted within a new social dimension, such as abortion and embryo reduction. Abortion is the interruption of pregnancy spontaneously or intentionally, resulting in the death of the still-to-be-born child. The Brazilian Federal Constitution and Civil Law guarantee the right to life from conception and provides the right of personality to the born child. However, the juridical ordering does not pinpoint the time of the start of life. The right to life is bonded to the principle of the human person from whom all other rights derive. These rights comprise freedom, family constitution and other. The right to life is not absolute since the lawmaker attributes differentiated tutelages to the still-to-be-born child and to the person, even permitting abortion on conditions foreseen by Penal Law. Embryo reduction is a procedure by which the number of fetuses in a multiple pregnancy is diminished so that complications could be avoided at the mother’s convenience or on medical advice. The Brazilian Federal Medical Council does not allow this practice even though it is a common occurrence, without any practical control, boiling down to the same effects of abortion. It should be emphasized that when multiple pregnancy puts the mother in danger, the procedure is a necessary abortion. However, the regulation of assisted human reproduction techniques is mandatory so that the ethical and juridical relativism in its procedures could be diminished or extinguished. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2548/1755 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 12 n. 2 (2012): jul./dez. 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798042386807390208 |