The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Beatriz Souza
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Rezende, Elcio Nacur
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1518
Resumo: This article aims to demonstrate the old dichotomy between public law and private law concerning the environmental good, as well as to common use, which is currently considered by the doctrine, diffuse goods, so it’s the right of everybody, as set out at art. 225 of the Constitution this way, the Civil Law in its article. 1228, incorporates a constitutional vision in finding that the property should be exercised in accordance with the purposes of economic, social and especially in regard to environmental legislation. But while at it’s art. 99, paragraph I states that environmental goods have the legal nature of public law, being inadequate, in a view of the current constitutional reality. The practical implications, the framework of the environmental good as a public good, would be the risk of the asset, be unaffected and free trade, or rather, the legislature in an attempt to protect these assets, provides in art. 100, CC, that “the public goods of common use and special use are inalienable, and while this qualification”, so this article protect and unprotect as these assets can be transformed into goods and consequently affected Sunday. It further implies that Brazilian society is restricted in its much larger: the environmental good, which is considered as a right to quality of life. This can not be without.
id UNICEUB-3_8cdffdb28204a90a5e1868e81ae0fa3b
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/1518
network_acronym_str UNICEUB-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy? O bem sob a ótica do direito ambiental e do direito civil: uma dicotomia irreconciliável? This article aims to demonstrate the old dichotomy between public law and private law concerning the environmental good, as well as to common use, which is currently considered by the doctrine, diffuse goods, so it’s the right of everybody, as set out at art. 225 of the Constitution this way, the Civil Law in its article. 1228, incorporates a constitutional vision in finding that the property should be exercised in accordance with the purposes of economic, social and especially in regard to environmental legislation. But while at it’s art. 99, paragraph I states that environmental goods have the legal nature of public law, being inadequate, in a view of the current constitutional reality. The practical implications, the framework of the environmental good as a public good, would be the risk of the asset, be unaffected and free trade, or rather, the legislature in an attempt to protect these assets, provides in art. 100, CC, that “the public goods of common use and special use are inalienable, and while this qualification”, so this article protect and unprotect as these assets can be transformed into goods and consequently affected Sunday. It further implies that Brazilian society is restricted in its much larger: the environmental good, which is considered as a right to quality of life. This can not be without.Este artigo tem como objetivo demonstrar a antiga dicotomia entre direito público e direito privado concernente ao bem ambiental, como bem de uso comum do povo, o qual atualmente é considerado, por parte da doutrina, bem difuso, portanto direito de todos, como estabelece o art. 225 da Constituição Federal (CF). Dessa forma, o Direito Civil em seu art. 1.228 incorpora uma visão constitucional ao considerar que a propriedade deve ser exercida em consonância com as finalidades econômicas, sociais e especialmente em respeito à legislação ambiental. Mas ao mesmo tempo em seu art. 99, inciso I, estabelece que os bens ambientais têm natureza jurídica de direito público, não se adequando, portanto, à realidade constitucional vigente. As implicações práticas, pelo enquadramento do bem ambiental como um bem público, seriam o risco desse bem ser desafetado e de livre comércio, ou melhor, o legislador, na tentativa de resguardar esses bens, estabelece no art. 100, do Código Civil, que “os bens públicos de uso comum do povo e os de uso especial são inalienáveis, enquanto conservarem essa qualificação”, de forma que protege e desprotege, porque esses bens podem ser transformados em bens dominicais e consequentemente desafetados. Implica ainda que a sociedade brasileira seja cerceada de seu bem maior: o bem ambiental, que é considerado como direito à vida com qualidade. Disso não se pode prescindir.UniCEUBCosta, Beatriz SouzaRezende, Elcio Nacur2011-09-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/151810.5102/rbpp.v1i3.1518Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 1, n. 3 (2011); 43-70Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 1, n. 3 (2011); 43-70Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 1, n. 3 (2011); 43-702236-16772179-8338reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBporhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1518/1479info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-18T22:50:06Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/1518Revistahttp://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/RBPPPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/oaiatendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com2236-16772179-8338opendoar:2018-12-18T22:50:06Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy?
O bem sob a ótica do direito ambiental e do direito civil: uma dicotomia irreconciliável?
title The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy?
spellingShingle The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy?
Costa, Beatriz Souza
title_short The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy?
title_full The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy?
title_fullStr The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy?
title_full_unstemmed The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy?
title_sort The good from the perspective of environmental law and civil law: an irreconcilable dichotomy?
author Costa, Beatriz Souza
author_facet Costa, Beatriz Souza
Rezende, Elcio Nacur
author_role author
author2 Rezende, Elcio Nacur
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Beatriz Souza
Rezende, Elcio Nacur
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv



description This article aims to demonstrate the old dichotomy between public law and private law concerning the environmental good, as well as to common use, which is currently considered by the doctrine, diffuse goods, so it’s the right of everybody, as set out at art. 225 of the Constitution this way, the Civil Law in its article. 1228, incorporates a constitutional vision in finding that the property should be exercised in accordance with the purposes of economic, social and especially in regard to environmental legislation. But while at it’s art. 99, paragraph I states that environmental goods have the legal nature of public law, being inadequate, in a view of the current constitutional reality. The practical implications, the framework of the environmental good as a public good, would be the risk of the asset, be unaffected and free trade, or rather, the legislature in an attempt to protect these assets, provides in art. 100, CC, that “the public goods of common use and special use are inalienable, and while this qualification”, so this article protect and unprotect as these assets can be transformed into goods and consequently affected Sunday. It further implies that Brazilian society is restricted in its much larger: the environmental good, which is considered as a right to quality of life. This can not be without.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-09-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1518
10.5102/rbpp.v1i3.1518
url https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1518
identifier_str_mv 10.5102/rbpp.v1i3.1518
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1518/1479
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 1, n. 3 (2011); 43-70
Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 1, n. 3 (2011); 43-70
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 1, n. 3 (2011); 43-70
2236-1677
2179-8338
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron:UNICEUB
instname_str Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron_str UNICEUB
institution UNICEUB
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com
_version_ 1798328490506846208