Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledge
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3787 |
Resumo: | This article was developed with the objective of understanding how the methods can contribute to the literacy process developed in the classroom, aiming, therefore, to discuss what is the best methodology to be privileged in the work done with the students of the initial grades. To support the theoretical foundations, we sought to understand the concepts of literacy, of method, as well as to discuss traditional and constructivist pedagogical trends, focusing on synthetic, analytical methods and the ideas of Paulo Freire and Emilia Ferreiro, who defend constructivist literacy. . The investigation was carried out based on observations and experiences in the classroom of the Vale do Guaporé Municipal School, located in the rural area of the municipality of Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade-MT, where for three months the researchers observed the practices and talked with the teachers school literacy teachers. The methodological approach contemplated in the research was a qualitative investigation and a bibliographic review, which made it possible to raise information about the theme. Its theoretical framework is based on: Freire, (1980, 2000, 2001), Kato, (1999), Barbosa (1994), Silva (1981), Corrêa (2000), Soares (1998), Ferreiro (1987). Thus, the result showed evidence that good methods are fundamental in the practice of literacy, as they contribute to the students' learning. It is important to state that in addition to choosing a good method, these need to be well thought out, planned and organized, in addition to having the monitoring of children's learning. Based on the research, it was observed that it is necessary to invest in constructivist teaching methods, making it possible for literacy to be active, efficient and effectively contemplate children. In addition, the need to invest in studies and dialogues about constructivist methods is also highlighted, as teachers demonstrate weaknesses in their understanding. |
id |
UNIFEI_19448f277b02572ed7d3e7c5bc34820e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3787 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledgeReflexionando sobre los métodos de alfabetización en la construcción del conocimientoRefletindo sobre os métodos de alfabetização na construção do conhecimentoConcepçõesensino-aprendizagemprática-pedagógicaconhecimento significativo.Conceptionsteaching-learningpedagogical practicemeaningful knowledge.Conceptosenseñanza-aprendizajepráctica pedagógicaconocimiento significativo.This article was developed with the objective of understanding how the methods can contribute to the literacy process developed in the classroom, aiming, therefore, to discuss what is the best methodology to be privileged in the work done with the students of the initial grades. To support the theoretical foundations, we sought to understand the concepts of literacy, of method, as well as to discuss traditional and constructivist pedagogical trends, focusing on synthetic, analytical methods and the ideas of Paulo Freire and Emilia Ferreiro, who defend constructivist literacy. . The investigation was carried out based on observations and experiences in the classroom of the Vale do Guaporé Municipal School, located in the rural area of the municipality of Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade-MT, where for three months the researchers observed the practices and talked with the teachers school literacy teachers. The methodological approach contemplated in the research was a qualitative investigation and a bibliographic review, which made it possible to raise information about the theme. Its theoretical framework is based on: Freire, (1980, 2000, 2001), Kato, (1999), Barbosa (1994), Silva (1981), Corrêa (2000), Soares (1998), Ferreiro (1987). Thus, the result showed evidence that good methods are fundamental in the practice of literacy, as they contribute to the students' learning. It is important to state that in addition to choosing a good method, these need to be well thought out, planned and organized, in addition to having the monitoring of children's learning. Based on the research, it was observed that it is necessary to invest in constructivist teaching methods, making it possible for literacy to be active, efficient and effectively contemplate children. In addition, the need to invest in studies and dialogues about constructivist methods is also highlighted, as teachers demonstrate weaknesses in their understanding.Este artículo fue desarrollado con el objetivo de comprender cómo los métodos pueden contribuir al proceso de alfabetización desarrollado en el aula, con el objetivo, por lo tanto, de discutir cuál es la mejor metodología para tener privilegios en el trabajo realizado con los estudiantes de los grados iniciales. Para apoyar los fundamentos teóricos, buscamos comprender los conceptos de alfabetización, de método, así como discutir las tendencias pedagógicas tradicionales y constructivistas, centrándonos en los métodos analíticos sintéticos y las ideas de Paulo Freire y Emilia Ferreiro, quienes defienden la alfabetización constructivista. . La investigación se realizó en base a observaciones y experiencias en el aula de la Escuela Municipal Vale do Guaporé, ubicada en la zona rural del municipio de Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade-MT, donde durante tres meses los investigadores observaron las prácticas y conversaron con los docentes. maestros de alfabetización escolar. El enfoque metodológico contemplado en la investigación fue una investigación cualitativa y una revisión bibliográfica, que permitió recabar información sobre el tema. Su marco teórico se basa en: Freire, (1980, 2000, 2001), Kato, (1999), Barbosa (1994), Silva (1981), Corrêa (2000), Soares (1998), Ferreiro (1987). Por lo tanto, el resultado mostró evidencia de que los buenos métodos son fundamentales en la práctica de la alfabetización, ya que contribuyen al aprendizaje de los estudiantes. Es importante afirmar que, además de elegir un buen método, estos deben estar bien pensados, planificados y organizados, además de tener un seguimiento del aprendizaje de los niños. Con base en la investigación, se observó que es necesario invertir en métodos de enseñanza constructivistas, lo que hace posible que la alfabetización sea activa, eficiente y contemple efectivamente a los niños. Además, se destaca la necesidad de invertir en estudios y diálogos sobre métodos constructivistas, ya que los maestros demuestran debilidades en su comprensión.O presente artigo foi desenvolvido com o objetivo de compreender como os métodos podem contribuir com o processo de alfabetização desenvolvido em sala de aula, visando assim, discutir qual a melhor metodologia para ser privilegiada no trabalho realizado com os educandos das séries iniciais. Para subsidiar os fundamentos teóricos buscou-se compreender os conceitos de alfabetização, de método, assim como discutir sobre as correntes pedagógicas tradicional e construtivista, focando nos métodos sintético, analítico e as ideias de Paulo Freire e Emília Ferreiro, os quais defendem a alfabetização construtivista. A investigação foi realizada a partir de observações e vivências em sala de aula da Escola Municipal Vale do Guaporé, localizada na zona rural do Município de Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade-MT, onde durante três meses os pesquisadores observaram as práticas e dialogaram com os professores alfabetizadores da escola. A abordagem metodológica contemplada na pesquisa foi uma investigação qualitativa e a revisão bibliográfica, as quais possibilitaram levantar informações acerca do tema. O seu referencial teórico está pautado em: Freire, (1980, 2000, 2001), Kato, (1999), Barbosa (1994), Silva (1981), Corrêa (2000), Soares (1998), Ferreiro (1987). Assim, o resultado apresentou indícios de que bons métodos são fundamentais na prática de alfabetizando pois contribuem para a aprendizagem dos educandos. É importante afirmar que além da escolha de um bom método, estes precisam ser bem pensados, planejados e organizados, além de contar com o acompanhamento da aprendizagem das crianças. A partir da pesquisa observou-se que é preciso investir em métodos de ensino construtivista, oportunizando que a alfabetização seja ativa, eficiente e contemple efetivamente as crianças, além disso, destaca-se também a necessidade de investir em estudos e diálogos sobre os métodos construtivistas, pois os professores demonstram fragilidades na compreensão dos mesmos. Research, Society and Development2020-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/378710.33448/rsd-v9i7.3787Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e75973787Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e75973787Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e759737872525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3787/2876Copyright (c) 2020 Edione Teixeira de Carvalho, Antonio Gomes, Simoni Pereira Borgesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorges, Simoni PereiraGomes, AntonioCarvalho, Edione Teixeira de2020-08-20T18:05:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3787Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:27:52.472905Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledge Reflexionando sobre los métodos de alfabetización en la construcción del conocimiento Refletindo sobre os métodos de alfabetização na construção do conhecimento |
title |
Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledge |
spellingShingle |
Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledge Borges, Simoni Pereira Concepções ensino-aprendizagem prática-pedagógica conhecimento significativo. Conceptions teaching-learning pedagogical practice meaningful knowledge. Conceptos enseñanza-aprendizaje práctica pedagógica conocimiento significativo. |
title_short |
Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledge |
title_full |
Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledge |
title_fullStr |
Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledge |
title_sort |
Reflecting on literacy methods in the construction of knowledge |
author |
Borges, Simoni Pereira |
author_facet |
Borges, Simoni Pereira Gomes, Antonio Carvalho, Edione Teixeira de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gomes, Antonio Carvalho, Edione Teixeira de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Simoni Pereira Gomes, Antonio Carvalho, Edione Teixeira de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Concepções ensino-aprendizagem prática-pedagógica conhecimento significativo. Conceptions teaching-learning pedagogical practice meaningful knowledge. Conceptos enseñanza-aprendizaje práctica pedagógica conocimiento significativo. |
topic |
Concepções ensino-aprendizagem prática-pedagógica conhecimento significativo. Conceptions teaching-learning pedagogical practice meaningful knowledge. Conceptos enseñanza-aprendizaje práctica pedagógica conocimiento significativo. |
description |
This article was developed with the objective of understanding how the methods can contribute to the literacy process developed in the classroom, aiming, therefore, to discuss what is the best methodology to be privileged in the work done with the students of the initial grades. To support the theoretical foundations, we sought to understand the concepts of literacy, of method, as well as to discuss traditional and constructivist pedagogical trends, focusing on synthetic, analytical methods and the ideas of Paulo Freire and Emilia Ferreiro, who defend constructivist literacy. . The investigation was carried out based on observations and experiences in the classroom of the Vale do Guaporé Municipal School, located in the rural area of the municipality of Vila Bela da Santíssima Trindade-MT, where for three months the researchers observed the practices and talked with the teachers school literacy teachers. The methodological approach contemplated in the research was a qualitative investigation and a bibliographic review, which made it possible to raise information about the theme. Its theoretical framework is based on: Freire, (1980, 2000, 2001), Kato, (1999), Barbosa (1994), Silva (1981), Corrêa (2000), Soares (1998), Ferreiro (1987). Thus, the result showed evidence that good methods are fundamental in the practice of literacy, as they contribute to the students' learning. It is important to state that in addition to choosing a good method, these need to be well thought out, planned and organized, in addition to having the monitoring of children's learning. Based on the research, it was observed that it is necessary to invest in constructivist teaching methods, making it possible for literacy to be active, efficient and effectively contemplate children. In addition, the need to invest in studies and dialogues about constructivist methods is also highlighted, as teachers demonstrate weaknesses in their understanding. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3787 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3787 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3787 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3787 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3787/2876 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Edione Teixeira de Carvalho, Antonio Gomes, Simoni Pereira Borges info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Edione Teixeira de Carvalho, Antonio Gomes, Simoni Pereira Borges |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e75973787 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e75973787 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e75973787 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052777637085184 |