The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resources
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21183 |
Resumo: | The guarantee of access to justice is a fundamental right, provided for in the Federal Constitution, which established the principle of non-removal of jurisdiction, guaranteeing free access to the Judiciary, which supports the gratuitousness of justice. Law 13,105/15, when providing for Free Justice, established themes consolidated by jurisprudence and doctrine, however, it did not establish the criteria for granting it. Thus, the problem to be analyzed in this article is about the need or not to prove the insufficiency of resources and the absence of parameters in the legal system. The methodology adopted is bibliographic research, with a descriptive and deductive approach on the subject. To apply for the benefit, a declaration stating that it is low-sufficient is enough, thus demonstrating an ease. For this reason, some scholars defend that only the declaration of hyposufficiency will be granted with documents that prove their real financial situation, as the declaration has relative presumption. However, the attachment of these documents is not uniform, each magistrate has requested the attachment of documents according to what he believes to be sufficient and according to the specific case. There is, however, a minority in the jurisprudence that has judged as sufficient only the declaration of hypo-sufficiency. Note that each judge will use their own subjective and discretionary criteria, not having uniformity regarding the granting of the benefit of free justice, causing the law to be applied unequally and providing the feeling of legal uncertainty. |
id |
UNIFEI_22af25f114f0d6ebb80d0123883ff88e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21183 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resourcesEl beneficio de la justicia gratuita y la necesidad o no de demostrar recursos insuficientesO benefício da justiça gratuita e a necessidade ou não de comprovar a insuficiência de recursosFree justiceInsufficiency of resourcesNeed for proofAbsence of legal criteriaInequality.Justiça gratuitaInsuficiência de recursosNecessidade de comprovaçãoAusência de critérios legaisDesigualdade. Justicia libreInsuficiencia de recursosNecesidad de pruebaAusencia de criterios legalesDesigualdad.The guarantee of access to justice is a fundamental right, provided for in the Federal Constitution, which established the principle of non-removal of jurisdiction, guaranteeing free access to the Judiciary, which supports the gratuitousness of justice. Law 13,105/15, when providing for Free Justice, established themes consolidated by jurisprudence and doctrine, however, it did not establish the criteria for granting it. Thus, the problem to be analyzed in this article is about the need or not to prove the insufficiency of resources and the absence of parameters in the legal system. The methodology adopted is bibliographic research, with a descriptive and deductive approach on the subject. To apply for the benefit, a declaration stating that it is low-sufficient is enough, thus demonstrating an ease. For this reason, some scholars defend that only the declaration of hyposufficiency will be granted with documents that prove their real financial situation, as the declaration has relative presumption. However, the attachment of these documents is not uniform, each magistrate has requested the attachment of documents according to what he believes to be sufficient and according to the specific case. There is, however, a minority in the jurisprudence that has judged as sufficient only the declaration of hypo-sufficiency. Note that each judge will use their own subjective and discretionary criteria, not having uniformity regarding the granting of the benefit of free justice, causing the law to be applied unequally and providing the feeling of legal uncertainty.La garantía de acceso a la justicia es un derecho fundamental, previsto en la Constitución Federal, que estableció el principio de no remoción de competencia, garantizando el libre acceso al Poder Judicial, que sustenta la gratuidad de la justicia. La Ley 13.105 / 15, al disponer la Justicia Libre, estableció temas consolidados por la jurisprudencia y la doctrina, sin embargo, no estableció los criterios para su otorgamiento. Así, el problema a analizar en este artículo es sobre la necesidad o no de probar la insuficiencia de recursos y la ausencia de parámetros en el ordenamiento jurídico. La metodología adoptada es la investigación bibliográfica, con un enfoque descriptivo y deductivo del tema. Para solicitar el beneficio, basta con una declaración que indique que es bajo suficiente, demostrando así una facilidad. Por ello, algunos estudiosos defienden que solo se otorgará la declaración de hiposuficiencia con documentos que acrediten su situación económica real, ya que la declaración tiene presunción relativa. Sin embargo, el adjunto de estos documentos no es uniforme, cada magistrado ha solicitado el adjunto de documentos según lo que crea suficiente y según el caso concreto. Sin embargo, hay una minoría en la jurisprudencia que ha juzgado como suficiente únicamente la declaración de hipoactividad. Nótese que cada juez utilizará sus propios criterios subjetivos y discrecionales, no habiendo uniformidad en cuanto al otorgamiento del beneficio de la justicia gratuita, provocando que la ley se aplique de manera desigual y dando la sensación de inseguridad jurídica.A garantia de acesso à justiça é um direito fundamental, previsto na Constituição Federal, onde se estabeleceu o princípio da inafastabilidade da jurisdição, garantindo o livre acesso ao Judiciário, tendo este dado respaldo a gratuidade da justiça. A Lei 13.105/15 ao prever a Justiça Gratuita consagrou temas consolidados pela jurisprudência e doutrina, porém, não estabeleceu os critérios para a concessão. Dessa forma, o problema a ser analisado neste artigo é sobre a necessidade ou não de comprovar a insuficiência de recursos e a ausência de parâmetros no ordenamento jurídico. A metodologia adotada é da pesquisa bibliográfica, com abordagem descritiva e dedutiva sobre o tema. Para requerer o benefício basta uma declaração afirmando ser hipossuficiente, demonstrando assim uma facilidade. Em razão disso alguns doutrinadores defendem que somente terá o deferimento a declaração da hipossuficiência vier acompanhada de documentos que comprovem sua real situação financeira, pois a declaração tem presunção relativa. Porém, a juntada desses documentos não é uniforme, cada magistrado tem pedido a juntada dos documentos de acordo com o que acredita ser suficiente e de acordo com o caso concreto. Há, contudo, uma minoria na jurisprudência que tem julgado como suficiente apenas a declaração da hipossuficiência. Nota-se que cada juiz utilizará seus próprios critérios subjetivos e discricionários, não possuindo uniformização quanto à concessão do benefício de justiça gratuita, fazendo com que a lei seja aplicada de modo desigual e propiciando a sensação de insegurança jurídica.Research, Society and Development2021-10-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2118310.33448/rsd-v10i13.21183Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e224101321183Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e224101321183Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e2241013211832525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21183/18938Copyright (c) 2021 Celso Hiroshi Iocohama; Cleverson Daniel Dutra; Kimberly dos Santos Manducahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIocohama, Celso Hiroshi Dutra, Cleverson DanielManduca, Kimberly dos Santos 2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21183Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:39.755412Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resources El beneficio de la justicia gratuita y la necesidad o no de demostrar recursos insuficientes O benefício da justiça gratuita e a necessidade ou não de comprovar a insuficiência de recursos |
title |
The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resources |
spellingShingle |
The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resources Iocohama, Celso Hiroshi Free justice Insufficiency of resources Need for proof Absence of legal criteria Inequality. Justiça gratuita Insuficiência de recursos Necessidade de comprovação Ausência de critérios legais Desigualdade. Justicia libre Insuficiencia de recursos Necesidad de prueba Ausencia de criterios legales Desigualdad. |
title_short |
The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resources |
title_full |
The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resources |
title_fullStr |
The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resources |
title_full_unstemmed |
The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resources |
title_sort |
The benefit of free justice and the need or not to prove insufficient resources |
author |
Iocohama, Celso Hiroshi |
author_facet |
Iocohama, Celso Hiroshi Dutra, Cleverson Daniel Manduca, Kimberly dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dutra, Cleverson Daniel Manduca, Kimberly dos Santos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Iocohama, Celso Hiroshi Dutra, Cleverson Daniel Manduca, Kimberly dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Free justice Insufficiency of resources Need for proof Absence of legal criteria Inequality. Justiça gratuita Insuficiência de recursos Necessidade de comprovação Ausência de critérios legais Desigualdade. Justicia libre Insuficiencia de recursos Necesidad de prueba Ausencia de criterios legales Desigualdad. |
topic |
Free justice Insufficiency of resources Need for proof Absence of legal criteria Inequality. Justiça gratuita Insuficiência de recursos Necessidade de comprovação Ausência de critérios legais Desigualdade. Justicia libre Insuficiencia de recursos Necesidad de prueba Ausencia de criterios legales Desigualdad. |
description |
The guarantee of access to justice is a fundamental right, provided for in the Federal Constitution, which established the principle of non-removal of jurisdiction, guaranteeing free access to the Judiciary, which supports the gratuitousness of justice. Law 13,105/15, when providing for Free Justice, established themes consolidated by jurisprudence and doctrine, however, it did not establish the criteria for granting it. Thus, the problem to be analyzed in this article is about the need or not to prove the insufficiency of resources and the absence of parameters in the legal system. The methodology adopted is bibliographic research, with a descriptive and deductive approach on the subject. To apply for the benefit, a declaration stating that it is low-sufficient is enough, thus demonstrating an ease. For this reason, some scholars defend that only the declaration of hyposufficiency will be granted with documents that prove their real financial situation, as the declaration has relative presumption. However, the attachment of these documents is not uniform, each magistrate has requested the attachment of documents according to what he believes to be sufficient and according to the specific case. There is, however, a minority in the jurisprudence that has judged as sufficient only the declaration of hypo-sufficiency. Note that each judge will use their own subjective and discretionary criteria, not having uniformity regarding the granting of the benefit of free justice, causing the law to be applied unequally and providing the feeling of legal uncertainty. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21183 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21183 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21183 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21183 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21183/18938 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Celso Hiroshi Iocohama; Cleverson Daniel Dutra; Kimberly dos Santos Manduca https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Celso Hiroshi Iocohama; Cleverson Daniel Dutra; Kimberly dos Santos Manduca https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e224101321183 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e224101321183 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e224101321183 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052756698071040 |