Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12779 |
Resumo: | The present study aims to analyze the hypothesis of fit of the autonomous means of challenge known as rescission action, when configured the hypothesis of art. 966, I, of the Civil Procedure Code, which deals with the decision rendered by virtue of the judge's malfeasance, concussion or corruption. The objective is to investigate, from the point of view of the Pontian ladder of the plans of the legal act, if the defect of the decision made in these circumstances fulminates the validity or the very existence of the legal act, reaching, in the end, understanding by the second hypothesis. The procedural effects arising from the said finding are analyzed, especially as regards the appropriate instrument for challenge. For this purpose, the deductive method is used, based on the general possibility, contemplated in the above mentioned device, for specific analysis under the prism of the plans of the legal act. It has a methodological objective in its propositional bias. The work will be based on bibliographic research and analysis of the legal text, jurisprudence and academic articles. |
id |
UNIFEI_47706fb428fb948da7cc47639c13ee51 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12779 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act? Sentencia judicial dada por prevaricación, concusión y corrupción del juez: ¿nula o no existencia del acto legal?Sentença judicial proferida por força de prevaricação, concussão e corrupção do juiz: nulidade ou inexistência do ato jurídico?Legal inexistenceNullitiesVerdictConcussionCorruptionPrevarication.Ausencia legalNulidadesVeredictoConcusiónCorrupciónPrevaricación.Inexistência jurídicaNulidadesSentençaConcussãoCorrupçãoPrevaricação.The present study aims to analyze the hypothesis of fit of the autonomous means of challenge known as rescission action, when configured the hypothesis of art. 966, I, of the Civil Procedure Code, which deals with the decision rendered by virtue of the judge's malfeasance, concussion or corruption. The objective is to investigate, from the point of view of the Pontian ladder of the plans of the legal act, if the defect of the decision made in these circumstances fulminates the validity or the very existence of the legal act, reaching, in the end, understanding by the second hypothesis. The procedural effects arising from the said finding are analyzed, especially as regards the appropriate instrument for challenge. For this purpose, the deductive method is used, based on the general possibility, contemplated in the above mentioned device, for specific analysis under the prism of the plans of the legal act. It has a methodological objective in its propositional bias. The work will be based on bibliographic research and analysis of the legal text, jurisprudence and academic articles.El presente estudio tiene como objetivo analizar la hipótesis de adecuación de los medios autónomos de impugnación conocidos como acción de rescisión, cuando se configura la hipótesis del arte. 966, I, del Código de Procedimiento Civil, que se ocupa de la decisión dictada en virtud de la mala conducta, conmoción cerebral o corrupción del juez. El objetivo es investigar, desde el punto de vista de la escalera pontiana de los planes del acto jurídico, si el defecto de la decisión tomada en estas circunstancias fulmina la vigencia o la existencia misma del acto jurídico, llegando, en definitiva, la comprensión por la segunda hipótesis. Se analizan los efectos procesales derivados de dicha constatación, especialmente en lo que respecta al instrumento de impugnación adecuado. Para ello, se utiliza el método deductivo, basado en la posibilidad general, contemplada en el dispositivo antes mencionado, de un análisis específico bajo el prisma de los planes del acto jurídico. Tiene un objetivo metodológico en su sesgo proposicional. El trabajo se basará en la investigación bibliográfica y el análisis del texto jurídico, jurisprudencia y artículos académicos.O presente estudo visa analisar a hipótese de cabimento do meio autônomo de impugnação conhecido como ação rescisória, quando configurada a hipótese do art. 966, I, do Código de Processo Civil, que trata da decisão proferida por força de prevaricação, concussão ou corrupção do juiz. O objetivo é investigar, sob uma ótica da escada ponteana dos planos do ato jurídico, se o defeito da decisão prolatada nessas circunstâncias fulmina a validade ou a própria existência do ato jurídico, alcançando-se, em desfecho, o entendimento pela segunda hipótese. Analisam-se os efeitos processuais decorrentes da referida constatação, mormente quanto ao instrumento cabível para impugnação. Utiliza-se, para tanto, o método dedutivo, onde se parte da possibilidade geral, contemplada no retromencionado dispositivo, para análise específica sob o prisma dos planos do ato jurídico. Tem objetivo metodológico em seu viés propositivo. O trabalho pautar-se-á em pesquisa bibliográfica e análise do texto legal, de jurisprudência e de artigos acadêmicos.Research, Society and Development2021-02-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1277910.33448/rsd-v10i2.12779Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 2; e53710212779Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 2; e53710212779Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 2; e537102127792525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12779/11576Copyright (c) 2021 José Miguel Garcia Medina; Mariana Sartori Novak; Diogo de Araujo Limahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedina, José Miguel GarciaNovak, Mariana SartoriLima, Diogo de Araujo2021-03-02T09:32:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12779Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:34:16.311871Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act? Sentencia judicial dada por prevaricación, concusión y corrupción del juez: ¿nula o no existencia del acto legal? Sentença judicial proferida por força de prevaricação, concussão e corrupção do juiz: nulidade ou inexistência do ato jurídico? |
title |
Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act? |
spellingShingle |
Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act? Medina, José Miguel Garcia Legal inexistence Nullities Verdict Concussion Corruption Prevarication. Ausencia legal Nulidades Veredicto Concusión Corrupción Prevaricación. Inexistência jurídica Nulidades Sentença Concussão Corrupção Prevaricação. |
title_short |
Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act? |
title_full |
Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act? |
title_fullStr |
Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act? |
title_sort |
Judicial sentence given for prevarication, concussion and corruption of judge: null or non-existence of the legal act? |
author |
Medina, José Miguel Garcia |
author_facet |
Medina, José Miguel Garcia Novak, Mariana Sartori Lima, Diogo de Araujo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Novak, Mariana Sartori Lima, Diogo de Araujo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medina, José Miguel Garcia Novak, Mariana Sartori Lima, Diogo de Araujo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Legal inexistence Nullities Verdict Concussion Corruption Prevarication. Ausencia legal Nulidades Veredicto Concusión Corrupción Prevaricación. Inexistência jurídica Nulidades Sentença Concussão Corrupção Prevaricação. |
topic |
Legal inexistence Nullities Verdict Concussion Corruption Prevarication. Ausencia legal Nulidades Veredicto Concusión Corrupción Prevaricación. Inexistência jurídica Nulidades Sentença Concussão Corrupção Prevaricação. |
description |
The present study aims to analyze the hypothesis of fit of the autonomous means of challenge known as rescission action, when configured the hypothesis of art. 966, I, of the Civil Procedure Code, which deals with the decision rendered by virtue of the judge's malfeasance, concussion or corruption. The objective is to investigate, from the point of view of the Pontian ladder of the plans of the legal act, if the defect of the decision made in these circumstances fulminates the validity or the very existence of the legal act, reaching, in the end, understanding by the second hypothesis. The procedural effects arising from the said finding are analyzed, especially as regards the appropriate instrument for challenge. For this purpose, the deductive method is used, based on the general possibility, contemplated in the above mentioned device, for specific analysis under the prism of the plans of the legal act. It has a methodological objective in its propositional bias. The work will be based on bibliographic research and analysis of the legal text, jurisprudence and academic articles. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12779 10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12779 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12779 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12779 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12779/11576 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 José Miguel Garcia Medina; Mariana Sartori Novak; Diogo de Araujo Lima https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 José Miguel Garcia Medina; Mariana Sartori Novak; Diogo de Araujo Lima https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 2; e53710212779 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 2; e53710212779 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 2; e53710212779 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052670970691584 |