(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
DOI: | 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17610 |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Online collaborative learning can support interprofessional education (IPE) in health, but barriers to social interaction require facilitating strategies. Objective: To map interprofessional social interaction favorable strategies for collaborative learning in distance education. Methodology: A scoping review based on the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual was used to identify evidence from databases and also the snowball technique. The inclusion criteria were: English language, research question terms and articles published from 2010 to 2020. Results: 12 studies were included in this review. Most studies were from 2011 (4); Canada (5); qualitative research, (11) and addressed two theoretical foundations: Community of Inquiry (4) and Constructivism (3). The main results show that the diversity in the composition of the interprofessional teams ranged from 2 to 10 professions; the most frequent interaction strategies in the studies were forums (6) and facilitators (6) and lack of time was the only barrier to social interaction that coincided in 2 studies. Discussion: The social presence strategies (Element of the Community of Inquiry) revealed in the literature and the parameters mapped in this research composed the facilitators of the social interaction targeted on this review. Final considerations: Articulated interprofessional interaction strategies can support online IPE programs in managing existing barriers. Future research may deepen the understanding of the findings of this study. |
id |
UNIFEI_547855e292aacbd1a7db90b8b8965047 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17610 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
spelling |
(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review (Inter) profesionales conectados para el aprendizaje colaborativo en línea: Una revisión del alcance(Inter) profissionais conectados para a aprendizagem colaborativa online: Uma revisão de escopo Interacción SocialEducación InterprofesionalEducación a distancia.Social InteractionInterprofessional EducationEducation, distance.Interação socialEducação interprofissionalEducação à distância.Introduction: Online collaborative learning can support interprofessional education (IPE) in health, but barriers to social interaction require facilitating strategies. Objective: To map interprofessional social interaction favorable strategies for collaborative learning in distance education. Methodology: A scoping review based on the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual was used to identify evidence from databases and also the snowball technique. The inclusion criteria were: English language, research question terms and articles published from 2010 to 2020. Results: 12 studies were included in this review. Most studies were from 2011 (4); Canada (5); qualitative research, (11) and addressed two theoretical foundations: Community of Inquiry (4) and Constructivism (3). The main results show that the diversity in the composition of the interprofessional teams ranged from 2 to 10 professions; the most frequent interaction strategies in the studies were forums (6) and facilitators (6) and lack of time was the only barrier to social interaction that coincided in 2 studies. Discussion: The social presence strategies (Element of the Community of Inquiry) revealed in the literature and the parameters mapped in this research composed the facilitators of the social interaction targeted on this review. Final considerations: Articulated interprofessional interaction strategies can support online IPE programs in managing existing barriers. Future research may deepen the understanding of the findings of this study.Introducción: El aprendizaje colaborativo en línea puede apoyar la educación interprofesional (EIP) en salud, pero las barreras en la interacción social requieren estrategias de facilitación. Objetivo: Mapear estrategias favorables para la interacción social interprofesional en el aprendizaje colaborativo de la educación a distancia. Metodología: Revisión del alcance, basada en recomendaciones del manual del Instituto Joanna Briggs, para identificar evidencias a partir de bases de datos y de la técnica bola de nieve. Criterios de inclusión: idioma inglés, términos escogidos para el tema de estudio y artículos publicados entre 2010-2020. Resultados: En esta revisión se incluyeron 12 estudios, la mayoría del año 2011, (4); de Canadá, (5); método, investigación cualitativa, (11). Se abordaron los fundamentos teóricos Comunidad de investigación (4) y Constructivista (3). Los principales resultados muestran que la composición de los equipos interprofesionales osciló entre 2 y 10 profesiones; las estrategias de interacción más frecuentes en los estudios fueron fórums (6) y facilitadores (6). La falta de tiempo como barrera a la interacción social coincidió en 2 estudios. Discusión: Las estrategias de presencia social (elemento de la Comunidad de Investigación) reveladas en la literatura, junto con los parámetros mapeados en este estudio constituyeron los facilitadores para la interacción social objeto de la revisión. Consideraciones finales: Las estrategias de interacción interprofesional articuladas pueden ayudar en los programas de EIP en línea para gestionar las barreras existentes. Investigaciones futuras podrían profundizar en la comprensión de los hallazgos de este estudio.Introdução: A aprendizagem colaborativa online pode apoiar a educação interprofissional (EIP) em saúde, mas barreiras à interação social requerem estratégias facilitadoras. Objetivo: Mapear estratégias favoráveis à interação social interprofissional para a aprendizagem colaborativa na educação à distância. Metodologia: Utilizou-se revisão de escopo, baseada nas recomendações do manual do Instituto Joanna Briggs, para identificar evidências a partir de bases de dados e da técnica bola de neve. Os critérios de inclusão foram: idioma inglês, termos escolhidos para a questão de pesquisa e artigos publicados no recorte temporal de 2010 a 2020. Resultados: Foram incluídos 12 estudos na presente revisão. A maioria dos estudos era do ano, 2011, (4 estudos); do Canadá, (5); método, pesquisa qualitativa, (11) e abordaram as fundamentações teóricas, Comunidade de investigação (4) e Construtivista (3). Os principais resultados mostram que a diversidade da composição das equipes interprofissionais variou entre 2 a 10 profissões; as estratégias de interação mais frequentes, nos estudos, foram fóruns (6) e facilitadores (6) e a barreira à interação social, falta de tempo, foi a única coincidente em 2 estudos. Discussão: As estratégias de presença social (elemento da Comunidade de Investigação), reveladas na literatura, em conjunto com os parâmetros mapeados, nesta pesquisa, compuseram os facilitadores à interação social alvos da revisão. Considerações finais: As estratégias de interação interprofissional articuladas podem apoiar programas de EIP online no manejo de barreiras existentes. Pesquisas futuras podem aprofundar a compreensão dos achados deste estudo.Research, Society and Development2021-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1761010.33448/rsd-v10i8.17610Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e50710817610Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e50710817610Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e507108176102525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610/15732Copyright (c) 2021 Danyelle Passos Morais Mota; Dais Gonçalves Rochahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota, Danyelle Passos Morais Rocha, Dais Gonçalves2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17610Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:55.068240Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review (Inter) profesionales conectados para el aprendizaje colaborativo en línea: Una revisión del alcance (Inter) profissionais conectados para a aprendizagem colaborativa online: Uma revisão de escopo |
title |
(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review |
spellingShingle |
(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais Interacción Social Educación Interprofesional Educación a distancia. Social Interaction Interprofessional Education Education, distance. Interação social Educação interprofissional Educação à distância. Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais Interacción Social Educación Interprofesional Educación a distancia. Social Interaction Interprofessional Education Education, distance. Interação social Educação interprofissional Educação à distância. |
title_short |
(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review |
title_full |
(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review |
title_fullStr |
(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review |
title_sort |
(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review |
author |
Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais |
author_facet |
Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais Rocha, Dais Gonçalves Rocha, Dais Gonçalves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha, Dais Gonçalves |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais Rocha, Dais Gonçalves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Interacción Social Educación Interprofesional Educación a distancia. Social Interaction Interprofessional Education Education, distance. Interação social Educação interprofissional Educação à distância. |
topic |
Interacción Social Educación Interprofesional Educación a distancia. Social Interaction Interprofessional Education Education, distance. Interação social Educação interprofissional Educação à distância. |
description |
Introduction: Online collaborative learning can support interprofessional education (IPE) in health, but barriers to social interaction require facilitating strategies. Objective: To map interprofessional social interaction favorable strategies for collaborative learning in distance education. Methodology: A scoping review based on the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual was used to identify evidence from databases and also the snowball technique. The inclusion criteria were: English language, research question terms and articles published from 2010 to 2020. Results: 12 studies were included in this review. Most studies were from 2011 (4); Canada (5); qualitative research, (11) and addressed two theoretical foundations: Community of Inquiry (4) and Constructivism (3). The main results show that the diversity in the composition of the interprofessional teams ranged from 2 to 10 professions; the most frequent interaction strategies in the studies were forums (6) and facilitators (6) and lack of time was the only barrier to social interaction that coincided in 2 studies. Discussion: The social presence strategies (Element of the Community of Inquiry) revealed in the literature and the parameters mapped in this research composed the facilitators of the social interaction targeted on this review. Final considerations: Articulated interprofessional interaction strategies can support online IPE programs in managing existing barriers. Future research may deepen the understanding of the findings of this study. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17610 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17610 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610/15732 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Danyelle Passos Morais Mota; Dais Gonçalves Rocha https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Danyelle Passos Morais Mota; Dais Gonçalves Rocha https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e50710817610 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e50710817610 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e50710817610 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822178547941244928 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17610 |