(Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rocha, Dais Gonçalves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610
Resumo: Introduction: Online collaborative learning can support interprofessional education (IPE) in health, but barriers to social interaction require facilitating strategies. Objective: To map interprofessional social interaction favorable strategies for collaborative learning in distance education. Methodology: A scoping review based on the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual was used to identify evidence from databases and also the snowball technique. The inclusion criteria were: English language, research question terms and articles published from 2010 to 2020. Results: 12 studies were included in this review. Most studies were from 2011 (4); Canada (5); qualitative research, (11) and addressed two theoretical foundations: Community of Inquiry (4) and Constructivism (3). The main results show that the diversity in the composition of the interprofessional teams ranged from 2 to 10 professions; the most frequent interaction strategies in the studies were forums (6) and facilitators (6) and lack of time was the only barrier to social interaction that coincided in 2 studies. Discussion: The social presence strategies (Element of the Community of Inquiry) revealed in the literature and the parameters mapped in this research composed the facilitators of the social interaction targeted on this review. Final considerations: Articulated interprofessional interaction strategies can support online IPE programs in managing existing barriers. Future research may deepen the understanding of the findings of this study.
id UNIFEI_547855e292aacbd1a7db90b8b8965047
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17610
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review (Inter) profesionales conectados para el aprendizaje colaborativo en línea: Una revisión del alcance(Inter) profissionais conectados para a aprendizagem colaborativa online: Uma revisão de escopo Interacción SocialEducación InterprofesionalEducación a distancia.Social InteractionInterprofessional EducationEducation, distance.Interação socialEducação interprofissionalEducação à distância.Introduction: Online collaborative learning can support interprofessional education (IPE) in health, but barriers to social interaction require facilitating strategies. Objective: To map interprofessional social interaction favorable strategies for collaborative learning in distance education. Methodology: A scoping review based on the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual was used to identify evidence from databases and also the snowball technique. The inclusion criteria were: English language, research question terms and articles published from 2010 to 2020. Results: 12 studies were included in this review. Most studies were from 2011 (4); Canada (5); qualitative research, (11) and addressed two theoretical foundations: Community of Inquiry (4) and Constructivism (3). The main results show that the diversity in the composition of the interprofessional teams ranged from 2 to 10 professions; the most frequent interaction strategies in the studies were forums (6) and facilitators (6) and lack of time was the only barrier to social interaction that coincided in 2 studies. Discussion: The social presence strategies (Element of the Community of Inquiry) revealed in the literature and the parameters mapped in this research composed the facilitators of the social interaction targeted on this review. Final considerations: Articulated interprofessional interaction strategies can support online IPE programs in managing existing barriers. Future research may deepen the understanding of the findings of this study.Introducción: El aprendizaje colaborativo en línea puede apoyar la educación interprofesional (EIP) en salud, pero las barreras en la interacción social requieren estrategias de facilitación. Objetivo: Mapear estrategias favorables para la interacción social interprofesional en el aprendizaje colaborativo de la educación a distancia. Metodología: Revisión del alcance, basada en recomendaciones del manual del Instituto Joanna Briggs, para identificar evidencias a partir de bases de datos y de la técnica bola de nieve. Criterios de inclusión: idioma inglés, términos escogidos para el tema de estudio y artículos publicados entre 2010-2020. Resultados: En esta revisión se incluyeron 12 estudios, la mayoría del año 2011, (4); de Canadá, (5); método, investigación cualitativa, (11). Se abordaron los fundamentos teóricos Comunidad de investigación (4) y Constructivista (3). Los principales resultados muestran que la composición de los equipos interprofesionales osciló entre 2 y 10 profesiones; las estrategias de interacción más frecuentes en los estudios fueron fórums (6) y facilitadores (6). La falta de tiempo como barrera a la interacción social coincidió en 2 estudios. Discusión: Las estrategias de presencia social (elemento de la Comunidad de Investigación) reveladas en la literatura, junto con los parámetros mapeados en este estudio constituyeron los facilitadores para la interacción social objeto de la revisión. Consideraciones finales: Las estrategias de interacción interprofesional articuladas pueden ayudar en los programas de EIP en línea para gestionar las barreras existentes. Investigaciones futuras podrían profundizar en la comprensión de los hallazgos de este estudio.Introdução: A aprendizagem colaborativa online pode apoiar a educação interprofissional (EIP) em saúde, mas barreiras à interação social requerem estratégias facilitadoras. Objetivo: Mapear estratégias favoráveis à interação social interprofissional para a aprendizagem colaborativa na educação à distância. Metodologia: Utilizou-se revisão de escopo, baseada nas recomendações do manual do Instituto Joanna Briggs, para identificar evidências a partir de bases de dados e da técnica bola de neve. Os critérios de inclusão foram: idioma inglês, termos escolhidos para a questão de pesquisa e artigos publicados no recorte temporal de 2010 a 2020. Resultados: Foram incluídos 12 estudos na presente revisão. A maioria dos estudos era do ano, 2011, (4 estudos); do Canadá, (5); método, pesquisa qualitativa, (11) e abordaram as fundamentações teóricas, Comunidade de investigação (4) e Construtivista (3). Os principais resultados mostram que a diversidade da composição das equipes interprofissionais variou entre 2 a 10 profissões; as estratégias de interação mais frequentes, nos estudos, foram fóruns (6) e facilitadores (6) e a barreira à interação social, falta de tempo, foi a única coincidente em 2 estudos. Discussão: As estratégias de presença social (elemento da Comunidade de Investigação), reveladas na literatura, em conjunto com os parâmetros mapeados, nesta pesquisa, compuseram os facilitadores à interação social alvos da revisão. Considerações finais: As estratégias de interação interprofissional articuladas podem apoiar programas de EIP online no manejo de barreiras existentes. Pesquisas futuras podem aprofundar a compreensão dos achados deste estudo.Research, Society and Development2021-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1761010.33448/rsd-v10i8.17610Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e50710817610Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e50710817610Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e507108176102525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610/15732Copyright (c) 2021 Danyelle Passos Morais Mota; Dais Gonçalves Rochahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota, Danyelle Passos Morais Rocha, Dais Gonçalves2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17610Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:55.068240Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review
(Inter) profesionales conectados para el aprendizaje colaborativo en línea: Una revisión del alcance
(Inter) profissionais conectados para a aprendizagem colaborativa online: Uma revisão de escopo
title (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review
spellingShingle (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review
Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais
Interacción Social
Educación Interprofesional
Educación a distancia.
Social Interaction
Interprofessional Education
Education, distance.
Interação social
Educação interprofissional
Educação à distância.
title_short (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review
title_full (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review
title_fullStr (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review
title_sort (Inter) professionals connected to online collaborative learning: A scoping review
author Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais
author_facet Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais
Rocha, Dais Gonçalves
author_role author
author2 Rocha, Dais Gonçalves
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mota, Danyelle Passos Morais
Rocha, Dais Gonçalves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Interacción Social
Educación Interprofesional
Educación a distancia.
Social Interaction
Interprofessional Education
Education, distance.
Interação social
Educação interprofissional
Educação à distância.
topic Interacción Social
Educación Interprofesional
Educación a distancia.
Social Interaction
Interprofessional Education
Education, distance.
Interação social
Educação interprofissional
Educação à distância.
description Introduction: Online collaborative learning can support interprofessional education (IPE) in health, but barriers to social interaction require facilitating strategies. Objective: To map interprofessional social interaction favorable strategies for collaborative learning in distance education. Methodology: A scoping review based on the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual was used to identify evidence from databases and also the snowball technique. The inclusion criteria were: English language, research question terms and articles published from 2010 to 2020. Results: 12 studies were included in this review. Most studies were from 2011 (4); Canada (5); qualitative research, (11) and addressed two theoretical foundations: Community of Inquiry (4) and Constructivism (3). The main results show that the diversity in the composition of the interprofessional teams ranged from 2 to 10 professions; the most frequent interaction strategies in the studies were forums (6) and facilitators (6) and lack of time was the only barrier to social interaction that coincided in 2 studies. Discussion: The social presence strategies (Element of the Community of Inquiry) revealed in the literature and the parameters mapped in this research composed the facilitators of the social interaction targeted on this review. Final considerations: Articulated interprofessional interaction strategies can support online IPE programs in managing existing barriers. Future research may deepen the understanding of the findings of this study.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17610
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17610
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17610/15732
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Danyelle Passos Morais Mota; Dais Gonçalves Rocha
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Danyelle Passos Morais Mota; Dais Gonçalves Rocha
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e50710817610
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e50710817610
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e50710817610
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052752139911168