Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean culture
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18469 |
Resumo: | This work aimed to evaluate possible symptoms of phytotoxicity, volume of spray droplet deposition on leaves from different positions of plant canopy, consequently, possible control of certain pathogen(s) efficiencies and finally, the interference of the phytotoxicity or control efficiency of the pathogen(s), on the production components of soybean culture. The experimental design used was a randomized blocks, with 7 treatments and 4 repetitions, which are constituted by T1 control, without the use of adjuvant; T2 Fungicide + aliphatic mineral oil; T3 Fungicide + Vegetable Oil Esters; T4 Fungicide + Orange vegetable oil; T5 Fungicide + Paraffinic mineral oil; T6 Fungicide + Fulvic acid; T7 Fungicide + Homeuse vegetable oil. The volume of spray in different positions of plant canopy, phytotoxicity, anthracnose and target spot incidence and soybean yield components were evaluated. After collecting data, the means were submitted to variance analysis by the F test at 5% probability and, afterwards, to comparison of means by Tukey test using Sisvar software. No statistical difference was observed for the evaluated parameters, with no increase in phytotoxins due the use of a certain adjuvant, thus all being efficient in helping in the control of the evaluated diseases. Therefore, the use of a more economical adjuvant such as homeuse soybean oil may be the best alternative for the producer, obtaining satisfactory aid to the fungicide. |
id |
UNIFEI_595fec744c7e31434a4006bac5f836f4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18469 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean cultureUso de diferentes adyuvantes en la aplicacion de fungicidas en cultivos de sojaUso de diferentes adjuvantes na aplicação de fungicida na cultura da sojaGlycine max LFitotoxidezDoençasProdutividade.Glycine max L.PhytotoxicityDiseaseProductivity.Glycine max L.FitotoxicidadEnfermedadesProductividad.This work aimed to evaluate possible symptoms of phytotoxicity, volume of spray droplet deposition on leaves from different positions of plant canopy, consequently, possible control of certain pathogen(s) efficiencies and finally, the interference of the phytotoxicity or control efficiency of the pathogen(s), on the production components of soybean culture. The experimental design used was a randomized blocks, with 7 treatments and 4 repetitions, which are constituted by T1 control, without the use of adjuvant; T2 Fungicide + aliphatic mineral oil; T3 Fungicide + Vegetable Oil Esters; T4 Fungicide + Orange vegetable oil; T5 Fungicide + Paraffinic mineral oil; T6 Fungicide + Fulvic acid; T7 Fungicide + Homeuse vegetable oil. The volume of spray in different positions of plant canopy, phytotoxicity, anthracnose and target spot incidence and soybean yield components were evaluated. After collecting data, the means were submitted to variance analysis by the F test at 5% probability and, afterwards, to comparison of means by Tukey test using Sisvar software. No statistical difference was observed for the evaluated parameters, with no increase in phytotoxins due the use of a certain adjuvant, thus all being efficient in helping in the control of the evaluated diseases. Therefore, the use of a more economical adjuvant such as homeuse soybean oil may be the best alternative for the producer, obtaining satisfactory aid to the fungicide.Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo evaluar posibles síntomas de fitotoxicidad, volumen de depósito de gotas de aspersión en hojas desde diferentes posiciones del dosel de la planta, consecuentemente, posibles eficiencias de control de ciertos patógenos, y finalmente, la posible interferencia de la fitotoxicidad o eficiencia de control de el patógeno(s), y bajo los componentes de producción del cultivo de soja. El diseño experimental utilizado fue de bloques al azar, con 7 tratamientos y 4 repeticiones, los cuales están constituidos por T1control, sin el uso de adyuvante; T2 Fungicida + aceite mineral alifático; T3 Fungicida + Ésteres de aceites vegetales; T4 Fungicida + Aceite vegetal de naranja; T5 Fungicida + Aceite mineral parafínico; T6 Fungicida + Ácido fúlvico; T7 Fungicida + Aceite vegetal uso casero. Se evaluó el volumen de caldo de aspersión en diferentes posiciones del dosel de la planta, fitotoxicidad, incidencia de antracnosis y mancha de Corynespora y componentes de rendimiento de soja. Recogió los datos, las medias fueron sometidas a análisis de varianza por la prueba F al 5% de probabilidad y, posteriormente, se sometió la comparación de medias por la prueba de Tukey por el software Sisvar. No se observó diferencia estadística para los parámetros evaluados, sin aumento de fitotoxinas debido al uso de un determinado adyuvante, siendo todos eficientes para ayudar a controlar las enfermedades evaluadas. Por tanto, el uso de un adyuvante más económico como el aceite de soja uso casero puede ser la mejor alternativa para el productor, obteniendo una ayuda satisfactoria al fungicida.Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar possíveis sintomas de fitotoxidez, volume da deposição de gotas da calda de pulverização nas folhas de diferentes posições do dossel da planta, consequentemente, possíveis eficiência de controle de determinado(s) patógeno(s), e por fim, a interferência da fitotoxidez ou eficiência de controle do(s) patógenos, e sob os componentes de produção da cultura da soja. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos casualizados, com 7 tratamentos e 4 repetições, os quais se constituem por T1 Controle, sem uso de adjuvante; T2 Fungicida + Óleo mineral alifáticos; T3 Fungicida + Óleo vegetal Ésteres; T4 Fungicida + Óleo vegetal de laranja; T5 Fungicida + Óleo mineral parafínicos; T6 Fungicida + Ácido fúlvico; T7 Fungicida + Óleo vegetal caseiro. Foram avaliados o volume de calda em diferentes posições do dossel da planta, fitotoxidez, incidência de antracnose e mancha alvo e os componentes de produtividade da soja. Coletados os dados, as médias foram submetidas a análise de variância pelo teste F a 5% de probabilidade e, posteriormente submetidas a comparação de médias pelo teste de tukey pelo software Sisvar. Não foi observado diferença estatística para os parâmetros avaliados, não havendo aumento de fitotoxidez por uso de determinado adjuvante, sendo todos eficientes no auxílio para controle das doenças avaliadas. Portanto, o uso de um adjuvante mais econômico como o óleo de soja caseiro, pode ser a melhor alternativa para o produtor, obtendo satisfatório auxílio ao fungicida.Research, Society and Development2021-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1846910.33448/rsd-v10i10.18469Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e123101018469Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e123101018469Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e1231010184692525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18469/16659Copyright (c) 2021 Rafael Ferreira Galvão; Martios Ecco; Rafaela Cristina Riffel; André Prechlak Barbosahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGalvão, Rafael Ferreira Ecco, MartiosRiffel, Rafaela CristinaBarbosa, André Prechlak 2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18469Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:36.135553Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean culture Uso de diferentes adyuvantes en la aplicacion de fungicidas en cultivos de soja Uso de diferentes adjuvantes na aplicação de fungicida na cultura da soja |
title |
Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean culture |
spellingShingle |
Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean culture Galvão, Rafael Ferreira Glycine max L Fitotoxidez Doenças Produtividade. Glycine max L. Phytotoxicity Disease Productivity. Glycine max L. Fitotoxicidad Enfermedades Productividad. |
title_short |
Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean culture |
title_full |
Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean culture |
title_fullStr |
Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean culture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean culture |
title_sort |
Use of different adjuvants in the fungicide application in soybean culture |
author |
Galvão, Rafael Ferreira |
author_facet |
Galvão, Rafael Ferreira Ecco, Martios Riffel, Rafaela Cristina Barbosa, André Prechlak |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ecco, Martios Riffel, Rafaela Cristina Barbosa, André Prechlak |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Galvão, Rafael Ferreira Ecco, Martios Riffel, Rafaela Cristina Barbosa, André Prechlak |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Glycine max L Fitotoxidez Doenças Produtividade. Glycine max L. Phytotoxicity Disease Productivity. Glycine max L. Fitotoxicidad Enfermedades Productividad. |
topic |
Glycine max L Fitotoxidez Doenças Produtividade. Glycine max L. Phytotoxicity Disease Productivity. Glycine max L. Fitotoxicidad Enfermedades Productividad. |
description |
This work aimed to evaluate possible symptoms of phytotoxicity, volume of spray droplet deposition on leaves from different positions of plant canopy, consequently, possible control of certain pathogen(s) efficiencies and finally, the interference of the phytotoxicity or control efficiency of the pathogen(s), on the production components of soybean culture. The experimental design used was a randomized blocks, with 7 treatments and 4 repetitions, which are constituted by T1 control, without the use of adjuvant; T2 Fungicide + aliphatic mineral oil; T3 Fungicide + Vegetable Oil Esters; T4 Fungicide + Orange vegetable oil; T5 Fungicide + Paraffinic mineral oil; T6 Fungicide + Fulvic acid; T7 Fungicide + Homeuse vegetable oil. The volume of spray in different positions of plant canopy, phytotoxicity, anthracnose and target spot incidence and soybean yield components were evaluated. After collecting data, the means were submitted to variance analysis by the F test at 5% probability and, afterwards, to comparison of means by Tukey test using Sisvar software. No statistical difference was observed for the evaluated parameters, with no increase in phytotoxins due the use of a certain adjuvant, thus all being efficient in helping in the control of the evaluated diseases. Therefore, the use of a more economical adjuvant such as homeuse soybean oil may be the best alternative for the producer, obtaining satisfactory aid to the fungicide. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18469 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18469 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18469 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18469 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18469/16659 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e123101018469 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e123101018469 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e123101018469 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052685153730560 |