Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhood
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24357 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To develop and validate the content of the “Tempo de Tela'' instrument for parents and/or guardians of children in the preschool period. Methods: 5 experts in the area of interest were selected to judge the instrument to be validated through a form with 12 dichotomous questions. The descriptive analysis was performed by calculating the simple frequency and content analysis was performed for the essay answers. Results: 100% of the judges judged the approach to the theme, direction to the content, clarity, coherence and cohesion, distribution of the questions and visual aspect as appropriate items. The changes considered were: adding a question (40%) and proposals for aesthetic changes (40%). Among the suggestions for adding questions are: The child's educational level; if you study in a public or private school; parents' socioeconomic level; parents' perception of screen time. Regarding aesthetic changes, the following were mentioned: greater space for open questions; greater space between one question and another; alignment in the middle of the topic sentences; use Likert scale; keep the same question on a single page. Conclusion: The instrument was subjected to the content validation steps recommended in the literature and fulfills the requirements regarding its face and content. |
id |
UNIFEI_5d40e0cee9e9ddfeed971c49ba6bf6b8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24357 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhoodValidación del contenido del instrumento para verificar el tiempo de uso de la pantalla en la infanciaValidação de conteúdo de instrumento para verificar o tempo de uso de tela na infânciaFonoaudiologiaLinguagem infantilFamíliaTempo de telaEstudos de Validação.Speech Language and Hearing SciencesChild LanguageFamilyScreen TimeValidation Study.FonoaudiologíaLenguaje InfantilFamiliaTiempo de PantallaEstudio de Validación.Purpose: To develop and validate the content of the “Tempo de Tela'' instrument for parents and/or guardians of children in the preschool period. Methods: 5 experts in the area of interest were selected to judge the instrument to be validated through a form with 12 dichotomous questions. The descriptive analysis was performed by calculating the simple frequency and content analysis was performed for the essay answers. Results: 100% of the judges judged the approach to the theme, direction to the content, clarity, coherence and cohesion, distribution of the questions and visual aspect as appropriate items. The changes considered were: adding a question (40%) and proposals for aesthetic changes (40%). Among the suggestions for adding questions are: The child's educational level; if you study in a public or private school; parents' socioeconomic level; parents' perception of screen time. Regarding aesthetic changes, the following were mentioned: greater space for open questions; greater space between one question and another; alignment in the middle of the topic sentences; use Likert scale; keep the same question on a single page. Conclusion: The instrument was subjected to the content validation steps recommended in the literature and fulfills the requirements regarding its face and content.Objetivos: Desarrollar y validar el contenido del instrumento “Tiempo de Pantalla” para padres y / o tutores de niños en el período preescolar. Metodología: se seleccionaron 5 especialistas en el área de interés para juzgar el instrumento a través de un formulario con 12 preguntas dicotómicas. El análisis descriptivo se realizó mediante el cálculo de la frecuencia simple y para las respuestas del ensayo se realizó un análisis de contenido. Resultados: 100% de los jueces juzgaron el enfoque del tema, la dirección del contenido, la claridad, la coherencia y cohesión, la distribución de las preguntas y la apariencia visual como ítems adecuados. Las modificaciones consideradas fueron: agregar una pregunta (40%) y propuestas de cambios estéticos (40%). Entre las sugerencias para agregar preguntas: nivel de educación del niño; si estudias en una escuela pública o privada; nivel socioeconómico de los padres; percepción de los padres del tiempo frente a la pantalla. En cuanto a los cambios estéticos, se mencionaron los siguientes: mayor espacio para preguntas abiertas; mayor espacio entre una pregunta y otra; alineación de temas a mitad de la oración; utilizar escala Likert; mantenga la misma pregunta en una sola página. Conclusión: El instrumento fue sometido a los pasos de validación de contenido recomendados en la literatura y cumple con los requisitos en cuanto a su cara y contenido.Objetivos: Desenvolver e validar o conteúdo do instrumento “Tempo de Tela” destinado a pais e/ou responsáveis por crianças no período pré-escolar. Metodologia: Foram selecionados 5 especialistas na área de interesse para julgar o instrumento através de um formulário com 12 questões dicotômicas. A análise descritiva foi realizada calculando a frequência simples e para as respostas dissertativas foi realizada a análise de conteúdo. Resultados: 100% dos juízes julgaram a abordagem ao tema, direcionamento ao conteúdo, clareza, coerência e coesão, distribuição das questões e aspecto visual como itens adequados. As modificações consideradas foram: adicionar uma questão (40%) e propostas de mudanças estéticas (40%). Dentre as sugestões de adição de questões: grau de escolaridade da criança; se estuda em escola pública ou privada; nível socioeconômico dos pais; percepção dos pais em relação ao tempo de tela. Em relação às mudanças estéticas foram citadas: maior espaço para questões abertas; maior espaço entre uma questão e outra; alinhamento ao meio das frases dos tópicos; utilizar escala Likert; manterá mesma questão em uma única página. Conclusão: O instrumento foi submetido às etapas de validação de conteúdo preconizadas em literatura e preenche os requisitos quanto à sua face e conteúdo.Research, Society and Development2021-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2435710.33448/rsd-v10i17.24357Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 17; e97101724357Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 17; e97101724357Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 17; e971017243572525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24357/21390Copyright (c) 2021 Leticia Rodrigues Alves Bispo; Matheus Francoy Alpes; Patrícia Pupin Mandráhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBispo, Leticia Rodrigues Alves Alpes, Matheus FrancoyMandrá, Patrícia Pupin 2022-01-01T11:11:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24357Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:42:56.500219Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhood Validación del contenido del instrumento para verificar el tiempo de uso de la pantalla en la infancia Validação de conteúdo de instrumento para verificar o tempo de uso de tela na infância |
title |
Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhood |
spellingShingle |
Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhood Bispo, Leticia Rodrigues Alves Fonoaudiologia Linguagem infantil Família Tempo de tela Estudos de Validação. Speech Language and Hearing Sciences Child Language Family Screen Time Validation Study. Fonoaudiología Lenguaje Infantil Familia Tiempo de Pantalla Estudio de Validación. |
title_short |
Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhood |
title_full |
Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhood |
title_fullStr |
Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhood |
title_full_unstemmed |
Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhood |
title_sort |
Content validation of an instrument to verify the screentime in childhood |
author |
Bispo, Leticia Rodrigues Alves |
author_facet |
Bispo, Leticia Rodrigues Alves Alpes, Matheus Francoy Mandrá, Patrícia Pupin |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alpes, Matheus Francoy Mandrá, Patrícia Pupin |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bispo, Leticia Rodrigues Alves Alpes, Matheus Francoy Mandrá, Patrícia Pupin |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fonoaudiologia Linguagem infantil Família Tempo de tela Estudos de Validação. Speech Language and Hearing Sciences Child Language Family Screen Time Validation Study. Fonoaudiología Lenguaje Infantil Familia Tiempo de Pantalla Estudio de Validación. |
topic |
Fonoaudiologia Linguagem infantil Família Tempo de tela Estudos de Validação. Speech Language and Hearing Sciences Child Language Family Screen Time Validation Study. Fonoaudiología Lenguaje Infantil Familia Tiempo de Pantalla Estudio de Validación. |
description |
Purpose: To develop and validate the content of the “Tempo de Tela'' instrument for parents and/or guardians of children in the preschool period. Methods: 5 experts in the area of interest were selected to judge the instrument to be validated through a form with 12 dichotomous questions. The descriptive analysis was performed by calculating the simple frequency and content analysis was performed for the essay answers. Results: 100% of the judges judged the approach to the theme, direction to the content, clarity, coherence and cohesion, distribution of the questions and visual aspect as appropriate items. The changes considered were: adding a question (40%) and proposals for aesthetic changes (40%). Among the suggestions for adding questions are: The child's educational level; if you study in a public or private school; parents' socioeconomic level; parents' perception of screen time. Regarding aesthetic changes, the following were mentioned: greater space for open questions; greater space between one question and another; alignment in the middle of the topic sentences; use Likert scale; keep the same question on a single page. Conclusion: The instrument was subjected to the content validation steps recommended in the literature and fulfills the requirements regarding its face and content. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24357 10.33448/rsd-v10i17.24357 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24357 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i17.24357 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24357/21390 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Leticia Rodrigues Alves Bispo; Matheus Francoy Alpes; Patrícia Pupin Mandrá https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Leticia Rodrigues Alves Bispo; Matheus Francoy Alpes; Patrícia Pupin Mandrá https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 17; e97101724357 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 17; e97101724357 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 17; e97101724357 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052791712120832 |