Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conduct
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21059 |
Resumo: | The work aims to present a dogmatic notion about the principle of judicial impartiality, addressing it, at first, from the perspective of the constitutional civil process. Furthermore, through bibliographic review, we sought to explain the international correspondence of this principle as an orientation of judicial conduct, bringing to light, a brief contribution of transnational law, as well as an overview of the main guidelines provided by the Principles of Judicial Conduct of Bangalore. And, by conclusion, we recorded the considerations extracted from empirical study, from which the duty of impartiality is perceived as a dogmatic orientation of difficult practical implementation, due to the human character of the judge, making him unable to fully exemption of value. Thus, the ideal of acting eminently impartial, was revealed only as an artificial orientation of behavior, due to consisting of an impractical duty in its entirety, since there would be no possibility of requiring judges, human beings, the untying of personal perceptions, experiences, principles and particular values at the time of the construction of the judicial decision. For this reason, the idea of impartiality can also be presented as a belief, based on which society maintains a minimal relationship of trust in the organs and agents that make up the justice system. |
id |
UNIFEI_7f61d0501079e0a48e16273e3e68c85d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21059 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conductImparcialidad judicial: un breve análisis de una dimensión de la conducta judicialImparcialidade judicial: uma breve análise sobre uma dimensão da conduta judicialImparcialidad judicialPrincipio procesalConducta judicialFunción judicialIndependencia.Imparcialidade judicialPrincípio processualConduta judicialFunção jurisdicionalIndependência.Judicial impartialityProcedural principleJudicial conductJudicial functionIndependence.The work aims to present a dogmatic notion about the principle of judicial impartiality, addressing it, at first, from the perspective of the constitutional civil process. Furthermore, through bibliographic review, we sought to explain the international correspondence of this principle as an orientation of judicial conduct, bringing to light, a brief contribution of transnational law, as well as an overview of the main guidelines provided by the Principles of Judicial Conduct of Bangalore. And, by conclusion, we recorded the considerations extracted from empirical study, from which the duty of impartiality is perceived as a dogmatic orientation of difficult practical implementation, due to the human character of the judge, making him unable to fully exemption of value. Thus, the ideal of acting eminently impartial, was revealed only as an artificial orientation of behavior, due to consisting of an impractical duty in its entirety, since there would be no possibility of requiring judges, human beings, the untying of personal perceptions, experiences, principles and particular values at the time of the construction of the judicial decision. For this reason, the idea of impartiality can also be presented as a belief, based on which society maintains a minimal relationship of trust in the organs and agents that make up the justice system.El trabajo tiene como objetivo presentar una noción dogmática sobre el principio de imparcialidad judicial, abordándolo, en un primer momento, desde la perspectiva del proceso civil constitucional. Además, a través de una revisión bibliográfica, se buscó explicar la correspondencia internacional de este principio como una orientación de la conducta judicial, sacando a la luz, una breve contribución del derecho transnacional, así como una visión general de las principales directrices proporcionadas, por los Principios de Conducta Judicial de Bangalore. Y, en conclusión, registran se las consideraciones extraídas del estudio empírico, del cual el deber de imparcialidad se percibe como una orientación dogmática de difícil implementación práctica, debido al carácter humano del juez, imposibilitando valorar plenamente la exención. Así, el ideal de actuar eminentemente imparcial se reveló sólo como una orientación artificial de la conducta, por consistir en un deber impráctico en su totalidad, ya que no habría posibilidad de exigir a los jueces - seres humanos, la desvinculación de percepciones personales, experiencias, principios y valores particulares en el momento de la construcción de la decisión judicial. Por esta razón, la idea de imparcialidad también puede presentarse como una creencia, basada en la cual la sociedad mantiene una mínima relación de confianza en los órganos y agentes que conforman el sistema de justicia.O trabalho tem como objetivo apresentar uma noção dogmática sobre o princípio da imparcialidade judicial, abordando-o, de início, sob a perspectiva do processo civil constitucional. Demais disso, por meio de revisão bibliográfica, buscou-se explicar a correspondência internacional do referido princípio como uma orientação de conduta judicial, trazendo a lume, para tanto, uma breve contribuição do direito transnacional, assim como um apanhado das principais diretrizes fornecidas pelos Princípios de Conduta Judicial de Bangalore. E, por conclusão, registrou-se as considerações extraídas de estudo empírico, a partir do qual se percebe o dever de imparcialidade como uma orientação dogmática de difícil implementação prática, em virtude do caráter humano do julgador, impossibilitando-o de total isenção valorativa. Dessa maneira, o ideal de atuação eminentemente imparcial se revelou apenas como uma orientação artificial de comportamento, em virtude de consistir num dever impraticável em sua totalidade, uma vez que não haveria possibilidade de se exigir de juízes, seres humanos, a desvinculação de percepções pessoais, experiências, princípios e valores particulares por ocasião da construção da decisão judicial. Por essa razão, a ideia da imparcialidade também pode ser apresentada como uma crença, com base na qual a sociedade mantém a mínima relação de confiança nos órgãos e nos agentes que integram o sistema de justiça.Research, Society and Development2021-10-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2105910.33448/rsd-v10i13.21059Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e103101321059Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e103101321059Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e1031013210592525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21059/18701Copyright (c) 2021 José Bruno Martins Leão; Luiz Manoel Gomes Junior; Miriam Fecchio Chueirihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeão, José Bruno MartinsGomes Junior, Luiz Manoel Chueiri, Miriam Fecchio 2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21059Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:33.094897Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conduct Imparcialidad judicial: un breve análisis de una dimensión de la conducta judicial Imparcialidade judicial: uma breve análise sobre uma dimensão da conduta judicial |
title |
Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conduct |
spellingShingle |
Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conduct Leão, José Bruno Martins Imparcialidad judicial Principio procesal Conducta judicial Función judicial Independencia. Imparcialidade judicial Princípio processual Conduta judicial Função jurisdicional Independência. Judicial impartiality Procedural principle Judicial conduct Judicial function Independence. |
title_short |
Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conduct |
title_full |
Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conduct |
title_fullStr |
Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conduct |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conduct |
title_sort |
Judicial impartiality: a brief analysis on a dimension of judicial conduct |
author |
Leão, José Bruno Martins |
author_facet |
Leão, José Bruno Martins Gomes Junior, Luiz Manoel Chueiri, Miriam Fecchio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gomes Junior, Luiz Manoel Chueiri, Miriam Fecchio |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leão, José Bruno Martins Gomes Junior, Luiz Manoel Chueiri, Miriam Fecchio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Imparcialidad judicial Principio procesal Conducta judicial Función judicial Independencia. Imparcialidade judicial Princípio processual Conduta judicial Função jurisdicional Independência. Judicial impartiality Procedural principle Judicial conduct Judicial function Independence. |
topic |
Imparcialidad judicial Principio procesal Conducta judicial Función judicial Independencia. Imparcialidade judicial Princípio processual Conduta judicial Função jurisdicional Independência. Judicial impartiality Procedural principle Judicial conduct Judicial function Independence. |
description |
The work aims to present a dogmatic notion about the principle of judicial impartiality, addressing it, at first, from the perspective of the constitutional civil process. Furthermore, through bibliographic review, we sought to explain the international correspondence of this principle as an orientation of judicial conduct, bringing to light, a brief contribution of transnational law, as well as an overview of the main guidelines provided by the Principles of Judicial Conduct of Bangalore. And, by conclusion, we recorded the considerations extracted from empirical study, from which the duty of impartiality is perceived as a dogmatic orientation of difficult practical implementation, due to the human character of the judge, making him unable to fully exemption of value. Thus, the ideal of acting eminently impartial, was revealed only as an artificial orientation of behavior, due to consisting of an impractical duty in its entirety, since there would be no possibility of requiring judges, human beings, the untying of personal perceptions, experiences, principles and particular values at the time of the construction of the judicial decision. For this reason, the idea of impartiality can also be presented as a belief, based on which society maintains a minimal relationship of trust in the organs and agents that make up the justice system. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21059 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21059 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21059 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21059 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21059/18701 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 José Bruno Martins Leão; Luiz Manoel Gomes Junior; Miriam Fecchio Chueiri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 José Bruno Martins Leão; Luiz Manoel Gomes Junior; Miriam Fecchio Chueiri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e103101321059 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e103101321059 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e103101321059 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052789617065984 |