Pet’s shared custody in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Elidsandra Oliveira da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Maffei, Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17298
Resumo: It will approach the juridical status of non-human animals in the Brazilian legal order, further the sentience of the non-human animal, as well as your place in the family environment using the contemporary concept of multispecies family, in which we understand the non-human animals as a member of the family. The fact of the non-human animals being considering as legal subjects by their multispecies family justify the plea for the shared custody in the marital dissolution moment. But even if they are scientifically and socially declared sentients. There isn’t a law to protect them inside the family environment. So, the judiciary cumulate different comprehensions to threat the pet’s shared custody right: sometimes it uses the analogy and considers them a legal subject and sometimes it does as the law says, according to article 82 of the Civil Code it threats them as objects. Therefore, while it doesn’t exist a law giving the non-human animals an appropriate status which assure their rights, it’s probable that there won’t be a pacific understanding as far as the pet’s shared custody is concern.
id UNIFEI_8092b31d14ee8e356372dd864091ae8e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17298
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Pet’s shared custody in BrazilLa custodia compartida de animales domésticos en BrasilA guarda compartilhada de animais domésticos no BrasilAnimais de estimaçãoSenciênciaFamília MultiespécieDireito do AnimalGuarda compartilhada de animais.MascotasSintienciaFamilia MultiespecieDerecho del animalCustodia compartida de animales.PetsSentienceMultispecies familyAnimals rightsPet’s shared custody.It will approach the juridical status of non-human animals in the Brazilian legal order, further the sentience of the non-human animal, as well as your place in the family environment using the contemporary concept of multispecies family, in which we understand the non-human animals as a member of the family. The fact of the non-human animals being considering as legal subjects by their multispecies family justify the plea for the shared custody in the marital dissolution moment. But even if they are scientifically and socially declared sentients. There isn’t a law to protect them inside the family environment. So, the judiciary cumulate different comprehensions to threat the pet’s shared custody right: sometimes it uses the analogy and considers them a legal subject and sometimes it does as the law says, according to article 82 of the Civil Code it threats them as objects. Therefore, while it doesn’t exist a law giving the non-human animals an appropriate status which assure their rights, it’s probable that there won’t be a pacific understanding as far as the pet’s shared custody is concern.Abordarán el status jurídico del animal no humano en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Brasileño, además de la sintiencia del animal no humano, bien como el lugar en el círculo familiar, sobre la luz del concepto contemporáneo de familia multiespecie, la cual comprende el animal no humano como miembro de la familia humana. El hecho de que los animales no humanos sean considerados como sujetos de derecho por la familia multiespecie justifica la elección por la custodia compartida de los animales domésticos en el momento de la disolución matrimonial. Pero, aunque científicamente declarados como sintiencia y así también los vistos por la sociedad, deja de existir la ley que tutele sus derechos en el ámbito familiar. De esta manera, el Poder Jurídico colma entendimientos divergentes al tratar del derecho de custodia compartida de animal doméstico, ora por analogía, lo trata como sujeto de derecho, ora como impone la ley, en los termos del art. 82 del Código Civil, lo trata como simple objeto. Por lo tanto, mientras no hay la ley que dé a los animales no humanos um status que le confiera derechos, muy probable que no va a haber entendimiento pacificado en relación al derecho de custodia compartida de los animales domésticos.Abordar-se-ão o status jurídico do animal não humano no Ordenamento Jurídico Brasileiro, além da senciência do animal não humano, bem como o seu lugar no âmbito familiar sobre à luz do conceito contemporâneo de família multiespécie, a qual compreende o animal não humano como um dos membros da família humana. O fato dos animais não humanos serem considerados como sujeitos de direito pela família multiespécie justifica o pleito pela guarda compartilhada de animais domésticos no momento da dissolução conjugal. Porém, ainda que cientificamente declarados como sencientes e assim também os vistos pela sociedade, inexiste lei que tutele os seus direitos no âmbito familiar. Desta forma, o Poder Judiciário cumula entendimentos divergentes ao tratar do direito de guarda compartilhada do animal doméstico, ora por analogia, o trata como sujeito de direito, ora como impõe a lei, nos termos do art. 82 do Código Civil, o trata como mero objeto. Portanto, enquanto não houver lei que dê aos animais não humanos um status que lhe confira direitos, bem provável que não haverá um entendimento pacificado no que diz respeito ao direito de guarda compartilhada de animais domésticos.Research, Society and Development2021-07-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1729810.33448/rsd-v10i8.17298Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e30710817298Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e30710817298Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e307108172982525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17298/15521Copyright (c) 2021 Elidsandra Oliveira da Silva; Eduardo Maffeihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Elidsandra Oliveira daMaffei, Eduardo 2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17298Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:40.194968Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pet’s shared custody in Brazil
La custodia compartida de animales domésticos en Brasil
A guarda compartilhada de animais domésticos no Brasil
title Pet’s shared custody in Brazil
spellingShingle Pet’s shared custody in Brazil
Silva, Elidsandra Oliveira da
Animais de estimação
Senciência
Família Multiespécie
Direito do Animal
Guarda compartilhada de animais.
Mascotas
Sintiencia
Familia Multiespecie
Derecho del animal
Custodia compartida de animales.
Pets
Sentience
Multispecies family
Animals rights
Pet’s shared custody.
title_short Pet’s shared custody in Brazil
title_full Pet’s shared custody in Brazil
title_fullStr Pet’s shared custody in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Pet’s shared custody in Brazil
title_sort Pet’s shared custody in Brazil
author Silva, Elidsandra Oliveira da
author_facet Silva, Elidsandra Oliveira da
Maffei, Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Maffei, Eduardo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Elidsandra Oliveira da
Maffei, Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Animais de estimação
Senciência
Família Multiespécie
Direito do Animal
Guarda compartilhada de animais.
Mascotas
Sintiencia
Familia Multiespecie
Derecho del animal
Custodia compartida de animales.
Pets
Sentience
Multispecies family
Animals rights
Pet’s shared custody.
topic Animais de estimação
Senciência
Família Multiespécie
Direito do Animal
Guarda compartilhada de animais.
Mascotas
Sintiencia
Familia Multiespecie
Derecho del animal
Custodia compartida de animales.
Pets
Sentience
Multispecies family
Animals rights
Pet’s shared custody.
description It will approach the juridical status of non-human animals in the Brazilian legal order, further the sentience of the non-human animal, as well as your place in the family environment using the contemporary concept of multispecies family, in which we understand the non-human animals as a member of the family. The fact of the non-human animals being considering as legal subjects by their multispecies family justify the plea for the shared custody in the marital dissolution moment. But even if they are scientifically and socially declared sentients. There isn’t a law to protect them inside the family environment. So, the judiciary cumulate different comprehensions to threat the pet’s shared custody right: sometimes it uses the analogy and considers them a legal subject and sometimes it does as the law says, according to article 82 of the Civil Code it threats them as objects. Therefore, while it doesn’t exist a law giving the non-human animals an appropriate status which assure their rights, it’s probable that there won’t be a pacific understanding as far as the pet’s shared custody is concern.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17298
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17298
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17298
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17298
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17298/15521
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Elidsandra Oliveira da Silva; Eduardo Maffei
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Elidsandra Oliveira da Silva; Eduardo Maffei
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e30710817298
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e30710817298
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e30710817298
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052681879027712