Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Parente, Nórlia Nabuco
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ciasca, Maria Isabel Filgueiras Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2903
Resumo: The study aimed to investigate how learning is assessed at the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE), Sobral Campus, comparing the Didactic Organization Regulation (ROD) with the teaching practice, and culminated with a pedagogical orientation action. It was motivated by an interest in understanding whether the assessment process may be affecting campus academic flow rates. The analysis and theoretical foundation were based on the five generations of evaluation (Lima Filho e Trompieri Filho, 2012) and Scriven's formative assessment concept (Rios, 2006). Being an action research, the cycle followed in which the practice is improved by the systematic interchange between acting and investigating (Tripp, 2005). The qualitative methodology originated from the documentary analysis of the regulation and the application of questionnaires to the teachers. With this information, the pedagogical intervention was planned and performed to discuss the difficulties and guide the teachers in the practice of formative assessment. The results showed that the evaluation in the ROD / IFCE has a formative character and that 51% of the teachers are aligned with this conception. However, most still prioritize quantitative aspects and hold students accountable for difficulties in the process. The intervention stage was positively evaluated and proved the need to deepen this topic discussion with other training actions and complementary studies.
id UNIFEI_929f09830bbb255d60765eacd4523dfa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2903
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practiceLa evaluación del aprendizaje instituto en el Reglamento de Organización Educativa y en la práctica de los maestros del campo de Sobral de la IFCEA avaliação da aprendizagem instituída no Regulamento de Organização Didática e na prática dos docentes do IFCE campus de SobralLearning assessmentAction researchFormative assessmentAcademic flow.Avaliação da aprendizagemPesquisa-açãoAvaliação formativaFluxo acadêmico.Evaluación del aprendizajeInvestigación de acciónEvaluación formativaFlujo académico.The study aimed to investigate how learning is assessed at the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE), Sobral Campus, comparing the Didactic Organization Regulation (ROD) with the teaching practice, and culminated with a pedagogical orientation action. It was motivated by an interest in understanding whether the assessment process may be affecting campus academic flow rates. The analysis and theoretical foundation were based on the five generations of evaluation (Lima Filho e Trompieri Filho, 2012) and Scriven's formative assessment concept (Rios, 2006). Being an action research, the cycle followed in which the practice is improved by the systematic interchange between acting and investigating (Tripp, 2005). The qualitative methodology originated from the documentary analysis of the regulation and the application of questionnaires to the teachers. With this information, the pedagogical intervention was planned and performed to discuss the difficulties and guide the teachers in the practice of formative assessment. The results showed that the evaluation in the ROD / IFCE has a formative character and that 51% of the teachers are aligned with this conception. However, most still prioritize quantitative aspects and hold students accountable for difficulties in the process. The intervention stage was positively evaluated and proved the need to deepen this topic discussion with other training actions and complementary studies.El estudio tuvo como objetivo investigar cómo se produce la evaluación del aprendizaje en el Campus Sobral del Instituto Federal de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología de Ceará (IFCE), comparando el Reglamento de la Organización Didáctica (ROD) con la práctica docente, y culminó en un Orientación pedagógica acción. Fue motivado por un interés en comprender si el proceso de evaluación puede estar afectando las tasas de flujo académico del campus. El análisis y la base teórica se basaron en las cinco generaciones de la evaluación (Lima Filho e Trompieri Filho, 2012) y el concepto de evaluación formativa de Scriven (Rios, 2006). Como se trata de una investigación de acción, se siguió el ciclo en el que se mejora la práctica mediante la oscilación sistemática entre actuar e investigar (Tripp, 2005). La metodología cualitativa partió del análisis documental de la regulación y la aplicación de cuestionarios a docentes. Con esta información, la intervención pedagógica fue planeada y llevada a cabo para discutir las dificultades y guiar a los maestros en la práctica de la evaluación formativa. Los resultados mostraron que la evaluación en ROD / IFCE tiene un carácter formativo y que el 51% de los maestros están alineados con este concepto. Sin embargo, la mayoría de ellos aún priorizan aspectos cuantitativos y responsabilizan a los estudiantes por las dificultades en el proceso. La etapa de intervención fue evaluada positivamente y demostró la necesidad de profundizar el tema con otras acciones de capacitación y con estudios complementarios.O estudo teve o objetivo de investigar como ocorre a avaliação da aprendizagem no Campus de Sobral do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará (IFCE), comparando o Regulamento de Organização Didática (ROD) com a prática docente, e culminou com uma ação de orientação pedagógica. Foi motivado pelo interesse em compreender se o processo avaliativo pode estar afetando as taxas de fluxo acadêmico do campus. A análise e fundamentação teórica foram baseadas nas cinco gerações da avaliação (Lima Filho e Trompieri Filho, 2012) e no conceito de avaliação formativa de Scriven (Rios, 2006). Por ser uma pesquisa-ação, seguiu-se o ciclo no qual se aprimora a prática pela oscilação sistemática entre o agir e o investigar (Tripp, 2005). A metodologia qualitativa partiu da análise documental do regulamento e da aplicação de questionários aos docentes. Com essas informações, foi planejada e realizada a intervenção pedagógica para discutir as dificuldades e orientar os docentes na prática da avaliação formativa. Os resultados mostraram que a avaliação no ROD/IFCE tem caráter formativo e que 51% dos docentes estão alinhados a essa concepção. Contudo, boa parte ainda prioriza os aspectos quantitativos e responsabiliza os alunos pelas dificuldades no processo. A etapa de intervenção foi avaliada positivamente e comprovou a necessidade de aprofundar o tema, realizando outras ações de formação e estudos complementares.Research, Society and Development2020-03-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/290310.33448/rsd-v9i4.2903Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 4; e110942903Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 4; e110942903Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 4; e1109429032525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2903/2152Copyright (c) 2020 Nórlia Nabuco Parente, Isabel Filgueiras Ciascainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessParente, Nórlia NabucoCiasca, Maria Isabel Filgueiras Lima2020-08-20T18:07:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2903Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:27:18.485681Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practice
La evaluación del aprendizaje instituto en el Reglamento de Organización Educativa y en la práctica de los maestros del campo de Sobral de la IFCE
A avaliação da aprendizagem instituída no Regulamento de Organização Didática e na prática dos docentes do IFCE campus de Sobral
title Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practice
spellingShingle Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practice
Parente, Nórlia Nabuco
Learning assessment
Action research
Formative assessment
Academic flow.
Avaliação da aprendizagem
Pesquisa-ação
Avaliação formativa
Fluxo acadêmico.
Evaluación del aprendizaje
Investigación de acción
Evaluación formativa
Flujo académico.
title_short Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practice
title_full Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practice
title_fullStr Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practice
title_sort Evaluation of learning instituted in the Teaching Organization Regulation and IFCE campus de Sobral teacher practice
author Parente, Nórlia Nabuco
author_facet Parente, Nórlia Nabuco
Ciasca, Maria Isabel Filgueiras Lima
author_role author
author2 Ciasca, Maria Isabel Filgueiras Lima
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Parente, Nórlia Nabuco
Ciasca, Maria Isabel Filgueiras Lima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Learning assessment
Action research
Formative assessment
Academic flow.
Avaliação da aprendizagem
Pesquisa-ação
Avaliação formativa
Fluxo acadêmico.
Evaluación del aprendizaje
Investigación de acción
Evaluación formativa
Flujo académico.
topic Learning assessment
Action research
Formative assessment
Academic flow.
Avaliação da aprendizagem
Pesquisa-ação
Avaliação formativa
Fluxo acadêmico.
Evaluación del aprendizaje
Investigación de acción
Evaluación formativa
Flujo académico.
description The study aimed to investigate how learning is assessed at the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE), Sobral Campus, comparing the Didactic Organization Regulation (ROD) with the teaching practice, and culminated with a pedagogical orientation action. It was motivated by an interest in understanding whether the assessment process may be affecting campus academic flow rates. The analysis and theoretical foundation were based on the five generations of evaluation (Lima Filho e Trompieri Filho, 2012) and Scriven's formative assessment concept (Rios, 2006). Being an action research, the cycle followed in which the practice is improved by the systematic interchange between acting and investigating (Tripp, 2005). The qualitative methodology originated from the documentary analysis of the regulation and the application of questionnaires to the teachers. With this information, the pedagogical intervention was planned and performed to discuss the difficulties and guide the teachers in the practice of formative assessment. The results showed that the evaluation in the ROD / IFCE has a formative character and that 51% of the teachers are aligned with this conception. However, most still prioritize quantitative aspects and hold students accountable for difficulties in the process. The intervention stage was positively evaluated and proved the need to deepen this topic discussion with other training actions and complementary studies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2903
10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2903
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2903
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2903
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2903/2152
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Nórlia Nabuco Parente, Isabel Filgueiras Ciasca
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Nórlia Nabuco Parente, Isabel Filgueiras Ciasca
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 4; e110942903
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 4; e110942903
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 4; e110942903
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052734817435648