Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdiction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Magno Federici
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pereira, Izabela Lemos de Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19654
Resumo: Full oral litigation is not foreseen in Brazil, but is adopted in certain acts. However, many times this institute is applied unevenly, or is not even applied, since the law generally establishes a faculty as to its use. For this reason, a debate is indispensable in order to criticize this use by the subjects of the process. For this, the legal-theoretical method and deductive reasoning were used, with bibliographic research technique. In the end, it is concluded that judicial governance can be an effective means, not with regard to the effectiveness of orality and, consequently, the effectiveness of jurisdiction.
id UNIFEI_9b0ffb99a1a3805e45f3d5fc96da5ab0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19654
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdictionLa gobernanza judicial como solución efectiva a la oralidad en el proceso civil brasileño: jurisdicción sostenibleGovernança judicial como solução efetiva à oralidade no processo civil brasileiro: jurisdição sustentávelOralityInappropriate useProcedural speedProcedural effectivenessJudicial Governance.OralidadUso inapropiadoVelocidad de procedimientoEficacia procesalGobernanza judicial.OralidadeUso inadequadoCeleridade procedimentalEfetividade processualGovernança Judicial.Full oral litigation is not foreseen in Brazil, but is adopted in certain acts. However, many times this institute is applied unevenly, or is not even applied, since the law generally establishes a faculty as to its use. For this reason, a debate is indispensable in order to criticize this use by the subjects of the process. For this, the legal-theoretical method and deductive reasoning were used, with bibliographic research technique. In the end, it is concluded that judicial governance can be an effective means, not with regard to the effectiveness of orality and, consequently, the effectiveness of jurisdiction.La litigación oral no está prevista explícitamente en Brasil, pero suele ser utilizada en diversos actos procesales. Sin embargo, muy a menudo este instituto se aplica de manera incorrecta, o no se utiliza, ya que la ley establece la facultad para su empleo. Así que un debate científico es fundamental para criticar su utilización por los sujetos procesales. Por lo tanto, se ha utilizado el método jurídico-teórico y el razonamiento deductivo con técnica de investigación bibliográfica. Se ha concluido que la gobernanza judicial puede ser una medida para el empleo de la oralidad y, en consecuencia, la efectividad de la jurisdicción sostenible.A litigância oral plena não é prevista no Brasil, mas é adotada em determinados atos. Entretanto, muitas das vezes esse instituto é aplicado de forma inadequada, ou sequer é aplicado, já que a lei estabelece, geralmente, uma faculdade quanto a sua utilização. Por esse motivo, torna-se indispensável um debate a fim de que se critique esse uso pelos sujeitos do processo. Para tanto, foi utilizado o método jurídico-teórico e raciocínio dedutivo, com técnica de pesquisa bibliográfica. Ao final, conclui-se que a governança judicial pode ser um meio eficaz no que tange à efetivação da oralidade e, consequentemente, a efetividade da jurisdição sustentável.Research, Society and Development2021-09-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1965410.33448/rsd-v10i11.19654Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 11; e379101119654Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 11; e379101119654Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 11; e3791011196542525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19654/17637Copyright (c) 2021 Magno Federici Gomes; Izabela Lemos de Castro Pereirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Magno FedericiPereira, Izabela Lemos de Castro2021-10-23T19:01:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19654Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:31.098350Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdiction
La gobernanza judicial como solución efectiva a la oralidad en el proceso civil brasileño: jurisdicción sostenible
Governança judicial como solução efetiva à oralidade no processo civil brasileiro: jurisdição sustentável
title Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdiction
spellingShingle Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdiction
Gomes, Magno Federici
Orality
Inappropriate use
Procedural speed
Procedural effectiveness
Judicial Governance.
Oralidad
Uso inapropiado
Velocidad de procedimiento
Eficacia procesal
Gobernanza judicial.
Oralidade
Uso inadequado
Celeridade procedimental
Efetividade processual
Governança Judicial.
title_short Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdiction
title_full Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdiction
title_fullStr Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdiction
title_full_unstemmed Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdiction
title_sort Judicial governance as an effective solution to orality in Brazilian civil process: sustainable jurisdiction
author Gomes, Magno Federici
author_facet Gomes, Magno Federici
Pereira, Izabela Lemos de Castro
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Izabela Lemos de Castro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Magno Federici
Pereira, Izabela Lemos de Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orality
Inappropriate use
Procedural speed
Procedural effectiveness
Judicial Governance.
Oralidad
Uso inapropiado
Velocidad de procedimiento
Eficacia procesal
Gobernanza judicial.
Oralidade
Uso inadequado
Celeridade procedimental
Efetividade processual
Governança Judicial.
topic Orality
Inappropriate use
Procedural speed
Procedural effectiveness
Judicial Governance.
Oralidad
Uso inapropiado
Velocidad de procedimiento
Eficacia procesal
Gobernanza judicial.
Oralidade
Uso inadequado
Celeridade procedimental
Efetividade processual
Governança Judicial.
description Full oral litigation is not foreseen in Brazil, but is adopted in certain acts. However, many times this institute is applied unevenly, or is not even applied, since the law generally establishes a faculty as to its use. For this reason, a debate is indispensable in order to criticize this use by the subjects of the process. For this, the legal-theoretical method and deductive reasoning were used, with bibliographic research technique. In the end, it is concluded that judicial governance can be an effective means, not with regard to the effectiveness of orality and, consequently, the effectiveness of jurisdiction.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19654
10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19654
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19654
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i11.19654
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/19654/17637
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Magno Federici Gomes; Izabela Lemos de Castro Pereira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Magno Federici Gomes; Izabela Lemos de Castro Pereira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 11; e379101119654
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 11; e379101119654
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 11; e379101119654
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052754561073152

Registros relacionados