I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in Law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Isaia, Cristiano Becker
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Obaldia, Bruna Andrade
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/13869
Resumo: The present work seeks to investigate, within the major theme of the theory of judicial decisions, the development of the relationship between social outcry, mediatized cases, and the making of discretionary decisions in law. To this end, the essay is divided into two large sections. It begins by understanding the appeal of the media as a portrayal of the popular will, acting as a guiding thread that transfers the tension from the right to discretionary judicial decisions. The second chapter, in turn, studies how media-popular influences determine decisions based on subjectivity and, thus, strengthen the entrenchment of the paradigm of the philosophy of conscience in law. Based on this, the question arises: to what extent can social appeal and the mediatization of cases, as allies, appear as protagonists in triggering discretionary judicial responses? To solve the research problem, the phenomenological-hermeneutic approach is used. At the end of the study, it is possible to conclude that the social appeal and the mediatization of cases, while allies, can appear as protagonists in triggering discretionary judicial responses as both phenomena act symbiotically in the possibility of producing subjectivity in the decision-making context, in greatly fed by the paradigm of the philosophy of consciousness in the process.
id UNIFOR-3_aa93e8cd3748d1a9bc2e2a9d58fbee44
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/13869
network_acronym_str UNIFOR-3
network_name_str Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in LawDecido así porque la sociedad piensa así: la relación simbiótica establecida entre llamamiento social, mediatización de casos y la toma de decisiones discrecionales en Derecho Decido assim porque a sociedade pensa assim: a relação simbiótica estabelecida entre apelo social, midiatização de casos e a tomada de decisões discricionárias em Direitoclamor socialdecisões judiciais discricionariedade judicialmidiatização de casosjudicial decisions judicial discretionmediatization of casessocial clamorclamor socialdecisiones judicialesdiscrecionalidad judicialmediatización de casosThe present work seeks to investigate, within the major theme of the theory of judicial decisions, the development of the relationship between social outcry, mediatized cases, and the making of discretionary decisions in law. To this end, the essay is divided into two large sections. It begins by understanding the appeal of the media as a portrayal of the popular will, acting as a guiding thread that transfers the tension from the right to discretionary judicial decisions. The second chapter, in turn, studies how media-popular influences determine decisions based on subjectivity and, thus, strengthen the entrenchment of the paradigm of the philosophy of conscience in law. Based on this, the question arises: to what extent can social appeal and the mediatization of cases, as allies, appear as protagonists in triggering discretionary judicial responses? To solve the research problem, the phenomenological-hermeneutic approach is used. At the end of the study, it is possible to conclude that the social appeal and the mediatization of cases, while allies, can appear as protagonists in triggering discretionary judicial responses as both phenomena act symbiotically in the possibility of producing subjectivity in the decision-making context, in greatly fed by the paradigm of the philosophy of consciousness in the process.El presente trabajo busca investigar, dentro del gran tema de la teoría de las decisiones judiciales, el desarrollo de la relación entre clamor social, casos mediatizados y la toma de decisiones discrecionales en derecho. Para esto, el ensayo se divide en dos grandes secciones. Se inicia por la comprensión del llamamiento de los medios mientrasrepresentante de la voluntad popular, actuando como hilo conductor que transfiere la tensión del derecho a las decisiones judiciales discrecionales. El segundo capítulo, por su parte, estudia como las influencias mediático-populares determinan decisiones nutridas de subjetividad y, así, fortalecen el arraigo del paradigma de la filosofía de la consciencia en el derecho. Con base en esto, se cuestiona: ¿En qué medida el llamamiento social y lamediatización de casos, mientras aliados, pueden figurar como protagonistas para el desencadenamiento de respuestas judiciales discrecionales? Para solucionar el problema de la investigación, se utiliza el enfoque fenomenológico-hermenéutico. Al final del estudio,es posible concluir el llamamiento social y la mediatización de casos, mientras aliados, pueden figurar como protagonistas para el desencadenamiento de respuestas judiciales discrecionales a la medida en que ambos fenómenos actúan simbióticamente en la posibilidad de producción de subjetividad en el contexto de decisión, en mucho alimentada por el paradigma de la filosofía de la consciencia en el proceso.O presente trabalho busca investigar, dentro do grande tema da teoria das decisões judiciais, o desenvolvimento da relação entre clamor social, casos midiatizados e a tomada de decisões discricionárias em direito. Para isso, o ensaio se divide em duas grandes seções. Inicia-se pela compreensão do apelo da mídia enquanto retratante da vontade popular, agindo como fio condutor que transfere a tensão do direito às decisões judiciais discricionárias. O segundo capítulo, por sua vez, estuda como as influências midiático-populares determinam decisões nutridas de subjetividade e, assim, fortalecem o arraigamento do paradigma da filosofia da consciência no direito. Com base nisso, questiona-se: em que medida o apelo social e a midiatização de casos, enquanto aliados, podem figurar como protagonistas para o desencadeamento de respostas judiciais discricionárias? Para solucionar o problema de pesquisa, utiliza-se a abordagem fenomenológico-hermenêutica. Ao final do estudo, é possível concluir o apelo social e a midiatização de casos, enquanto aliados, podem figurar como protagonistas para o desencadeamento de respostas judiciais discricionárias na medida em que ambos fenômenos atuam simbioticamente na possibilidade de produção de subjetividade no contexto decisório, em muito alimentada pelo paradigma da filosofia da consciência no processo.Universidade de Fortaleza2024-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/1386910.5020/2317-2150.2024.13869Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2024); 1-10Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2024); 1-10Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 29 n. 2 (2024); 1-102317-21501519-8464reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)instacron:UNIFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/13869/7265Copyright (c) 2024 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Isaia, Cristiano BeckerObaldia, Bruna Andrade2024-05-09T13:13:12Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/13869Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/rpenhttp://ojs.unifor.br/index.php/rpen/oai||revistapensar@unifor.br2317-21501519-8464opendoar:2024-05-09T13:13:12Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in Law
Decido así porque la sociedad piensa así: la relación simbiótica establecida entre llamamiento social, mediatización de casos y la toma de decisiones discrecionales en Derecho
Decido assim porque a sociedade pensa assim: a relação simbiótica estabelecida entre apelo social, midiatização de casos e a tomada de decisões discricionárias em Direito
title I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in Law
spellingShingle I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in Law
Isaia, Cristiano Becker
clamor social
decisões judiciais
discricionariedade judicial
midiatização de casos
judicial decisions
judicial discretion
mediatization of cases
social clamor
clamor social
decisiones judiciales
discrecionalidad judicial
mediatización de casos
title_short I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in Law
title_full I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in Law
title_fullStr I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in Law
title_full_unstemmed I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in Law
title_sort I decide this way because society thinks this way: the symbiotic relationship established between social appeal, mediatization of cases, and discretionary decision-making in Law
author Isaia, Cristiano Becker
author_facet Isaia, Cristiano Becker
Obaldia, Bruna Andrade
author_role author
author2 Obaldia, Bruna Andrade
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Isaia, Cristiano Becker
Obaldia, Bruna Andrade
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv clamor social
decisões judiciais
discricionariedade judicial
midiatização de casos
judicial decisions
judicial discretion
mediatization of cases
social clamor
clamor social
decisiones judiciales
discrecionalidad judicial
mediatización de casos
topic clamor social
decisões judiciais
discricionariedade judicial
midiatização de casos
judicial decisions
judicial discretion
mediatization of cases
social clamor
clamor social
decisiones judiciales
discrecionalidad judicial
mediatización de casos
description The present work seeks to investigate, within the major theme of the theory of judicial decisions, the development of the relationship between social outcry, mediatized cases, and the making of discretionary decisions in law. To this end, the essay is divided into two large sections. It begins by understanding the appeal of the media as a portrayal of the popular will, acting as a guiding thread that transfers the tension from the right to discretionary judicial decisions. The second chapter, in turn, studies how media-popular influences determine decisions based on subjectivity and, thus, strengthen the entrenchment of the paradigm of the philosophy of conscience in law. Based on this, the question arises: to what extent can social appeal and the mediatization of cases, as allies, appear as protagonists in triggering discretionary judicial responses? To solve the research problem, the phenomenological-hermeneutic approach is used. At the end of the study, it is possible to conclude that the social appeal and the mediatization of cases, while allies, can appear as protagonists in triggering discretionary judicial responses as both phenomena act symbiotically in the possibility of producing subjectivity in the decision-making context, in greatly fed by the paradigm of the philosophy of consciousness in the process.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/13869
10.5020/2317-2150.2024.13869
url https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/13869
identifier_str_mv 10.5020/2317-2150.2024.13869
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/13869/7265
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2024); 1-10
Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2024); 1-10
Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 29 n. 2 (2024); 1-10
2317-2150
1519-8464
reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)
instacron:UNIFOR
instname_str Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)
instacron_str UNIFOR
institution UNIFOR
reponame_str Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
collection Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistapensar@unifor.br
_version_ 1800217257126658048

Registros relacionados