Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergences
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Thesis Juris |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16342 |
Resumo: | This paper seeks to promote a dialogue between the social function and corporate social responsibility, emphasizing that the first one is legally mandatory, as it is a expressly provided in national legislation, while the second one is voluntary, due to the liberality of business organizations even if presented as a firm compromise. On the other hand, it is explained, supported on the agency's dilemma, how social responsibility, originated from the valuation of business ethics and composes the companies’ strategy in the postmodern market, without, however, undermining its Weberian ethical foundation. It is argued that companies prefer to broaden their social responsibility, from which they can reap market advantages and are easily planned, as a mean of curbing attached legal duties and obligations arising from the prescription of social function as it is possible being it a legal category, thus endowed with imperativeness and legal action. It has been used the hypothetical-deductive method and bibliographical research, periodicals, reports and official and legal texts. |
id |
UNINOVE-2_726292c4f08176cadb7bcb6ca2b86802 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/16342 |
network_acronym_str |
UNINOVE-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergencesFunção social e responsabilidade social empresarial: convergências e divergênciasSocial function attributionCorporate social responsibilityAgency dilemma.Função social. Responsabilidade social. Empresa. Desenvolvimento sustentável. Ética empresarial.This paper seeks to promote a dialogue between the social function and corporate social responsibility, emphasizing that the first one is legally mandatory, as it is a expressly provided in national legislation, while the second one is voluntary, due to the liberality of business organizations even if presented as a firm compromise. On the other hand, it is explained, supported on the agency's dilemma, how social responsibility, originated from the valuation of business ethics and composes the companies’ strategy in the postmodern market, without, however, undermining its Weberian ethical foundation. It is argued that companies prefer to broaden their social responsibility, from which they can reap market advantages and are easily planned, as a mean of curbing attached legal duties and obligations arising from the prescription of social function as it is possible being it a legal category, thus endowed with imperativeness and legal action. It has been used the hypothetical-deductive method and bibliographical research, periodicals, reports and official and legal texts. Este artigo busca promover o diálogo entre a função social e a responsabilidade social empresarial, realçando ser aquela cogente, por se tratar de categoria jurídica própria expressamente prevista na legislação nacional, ao passo que esta é voluntária, decorrente de uma liberalidade das organizações empresariais, ainda que apresentadas como um firme compromisso. Por outro lado, explica-se, com apoio no dilema da agência, como a responsabilidade social, originada da valorização da ética empresarial, passou a compor a estratégia da empresa no mercado pós-moderno, sem, porém, inquinar seu fundamento ético weberiano da responsabilidade. Defende-se que as empresas preferem alargar sua responsabilidade social, da qual, aliás, podem colher vantagens de mercado como meio de refrear o reconhecimento de deveres e obrigações jurídicos anexos, de difícil previsão econômica, derivados da prescrição da função social como categoria jurídica própria, dotada, assim, de imperatividade e pretensão. Utilizou-se do método hipotético-dedutivo e da pesquisa bibliográfica, de periódicos, relatórios e textos oficiais e legais. Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2020-01-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/1634210.5585/rtj.v8i2.696Revista Thesis Juris; v. 8 n. 2 (2019): (jul./dez.); 119-1482317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16342/8019Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Thesis Jurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPacca Ferraz de Camargo, CaioBenacchio, Marcelo2020-06-23T19:57:42Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/16342Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2020-06-23T19:57:42Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergences Função social e responsabilidade social empresarial: convergências e divergências |
title |
Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergences |
spellingShingle |
Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergences Pacca Ferraz de Camargo, Caio Social function attribution Corporate social responsibility Agency dilemma. Função social. Responsabilidade social. Empresa. Desenvolvimento sustentável. Ética empresarial. |
title_short |
Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergences |
title_full |
Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergences |
title_fullStr |
Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergences |
title_sort |
Social function and corporate social responsibility: convergences and divergences |
author |
Pacca Ferraz de Camargo, Caio |
author_facet |
Pacca Ferraz de Camargo, Caio Benacchio, Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Benacchio, Marcelo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pacca Ferraz de Camargo, Caio Benacchio, Marcelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social function attribution Corporate social responsibility Agency dilemma. Função social. Responsabilidade social. Empresa. Desenvolvimento sustentável. Ética empresarial. |
topic |
Social function attribution Corporate social responsibility Agency dilemma. Função social. Responsabilidade social. Empresa. Desenvolvimento sustentável. Ética empresarial. |
description |
This paper seeks to promote a dialogue between the social function and corporate social responsibility, emphasizing that the first one is legally mandatory, as it is a expressly provided in national legislation, while the second one is voluntary, due to the liberality of business organizations even if presented as a firm compromise. On the other hand, it is explained, supported on the agency's dilemma, how social responsibility, originated from the valuation of business ethics and composes the companies’ strategy in the postmodern market, without, however, undermining its Weberian ethical foundation. It is argued that companies prefer to broaden their social responsibility, from which they can reap market advantages and are easily planned, as a mean of curbing attached legal duties and obligations arising from the prescription of social function as it is possible being it a legal category, thus endowed with imperativeness and legal action. It has been used the hypothetical-deductive method and bibliographical research, periodicals, reports and official and legal texts. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16342 10.5585/rtj.v8i2.696 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16342 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/rtj.v8i2.696 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/16342/8019 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Thesis Juris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Thesis Juris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris; v. 8 n. 2 (2019): (jul./dez.); 119-148 2317-3580 reponame:Revista Thesis Juris instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
institution |
UNINOVE |
reponame_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
collection |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
thesis@uninove.br |
_version_ |
1800218169325912064 |